Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"  (Read 5428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8172
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Let me tell you a secret...
  • Respect: +9625
    • View Profile
"Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« on: June 16, 2013, 03:34:44 pm »
0

Here's something interesting - why do we have "discard a card" as a thing?  Why not have that written as "-1 Card"?  It makes a certain amount of sense - +Card indicates you're adding to your hand from your deck; -Card would indicate you're subtracting from your hand into your discard pile.  If it written like this, a lot of cards would suddenly become "vanilla":

Warehouse: +1 Action, +3 Cards, -3 Cards
Embassy: +5 Cards, -3 Cards
Oasis: +1 Card, +1 Action, +$1, -1 Card

And a lot of other cards shorten a little bit.

Thinking about it, there are plenty of cards out there that say "discard any number of cards" or "discard your hand", limiting the usefulness, and it might get confused with trashing.  Or maybe Donald X just didn't want minus signs (until Poor House). 
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Tables

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2816
  • Build more Bridges in the King's Court!
  • Respect: +3347
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2013, 03:44:54 pm »
+1

One big thing I can see is:

What happens when you get, say, +$1, then -$1? Intuitively, nothing. What about +1 action, then -1 action? Again, nothing. How about +1 buy, then -1 buy? Nothing. +1 VP, -1 VP? No change. +1 card, -1 card? You've drawn a card and then discarded a card. So one card has moved from your deck to your hand, and another (possibly the same) has move from your hand to your discard. I think it's that asymmetry between the two that makes it a little more awkward, and why it isn't used.
Logged
...spin-offs are still better for all of the previously cited reasons.
But not strictly better, because the spinoff can have a different cost than the expansion.

Fuu

  • Bishop
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 114
  • Shuffle iT Username: Fuu
  • Respect: +87
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2013, 04:51:17 pm »
+1

It would make a certain amount of sense and look cleaner, but Tables has a point. I suppose that Action/Buy/Coin are 'commutative', in that you could add and subtract them in whatever order and the net effect would be the same (with the caveat that 'not less than zero coins' is explicitly stated when it could happen, e.g. -$1 +$1). By contrast, -1 card +1 card is totally different to +1 card -1 card. However that isn't really an argument for not writing it as -cards... but you would still probably prefer to say 'discard' when for instance you -cards down to n, just like you say 'draw' when you +cards up to n.
Logged

SirPeebles

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3249
  • Respect: +5459
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2013, 04:52:34 pm »
+3

This is confusing.  "-1 card" makes more sense for topdecking a card from your hand, not discarding a card.
Logged
Well you *do* need a signature...

Kirian

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7096
  • Shuffle iT Username: Kirian
  • An Unbalanced Equation
  • Respect: +9411
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2013, 04:55:33 pm »
+1

Donald used this very notation in Nefarious, along with using symbols.
Logged
Kirian's Law of f.DS jokes:  Any sufficiently unexplained joke is indistinguishable from serious conversation.

ftl

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Shuffle iT Username: ftl
  • Respect: +1345
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2013, 05:09:54 pm »
+3

In Dominion, discard is often paired with a lot of different descriptors - "discard down to 3 cards in hand" "discard X cards" "discard a [particular card]" "discard from play" or "discard any number of  cards". There aren't THAT many cards that have a vanilla "discard X cards" effect. Specifically, there aren't any at all in Base Dominion I think? In Intrigue, there's only Torturer? In Seaside, there's only Warehouse? Maybe I missed one or two, but it really is sort of rare. Nowhere near as common as "+X actions" or "+$X".
Logged

Warfreak2

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1149
  • KC->KC->[Scavenger, Scavenger, Lookout]
  • Respect: +1324
    • View Profile
    • Music what I do
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2013, 11:14:54 pm »
0

I think it's wrong to start using - for something that is not the inverse of +.

There are a bunch of things that actually could simplify cards, but you should target wordy cards, not Warehouse and Embassy. For example, you could define "dig for ___" as "reveal cards from your deck until you reveal ___; discard the rest" - this would save this mechanic from having to be defined individually on each of Saboteur, Fortune Teller, Farming Village, Hunting Party, Sage, Rebuild, Loan and Venture.
Logged
If the only engine on the board is Procession->Conspirator, I will play it.

mail-mi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1298
  • Shuffle iT Username: mail-mi
  • Come play some Forum Mafia with us!
  • Respect: +1364
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2013, 11:19:03 pm »
0

I think it's wrong to start using - for something that is not the inverse of +.

There are a bunch of things that actually could simplify cards, but you should target wordy cards, not Warehouse and Embassy. For example, you could define "dig for ___" as "reveal cards from your deck until you reveal ___; discard the rest" - this would save this mechanic from having to be defined individually on each of Saboteur, Fortune Teller, Farming Village, Hunting Party, Sage, Rebuild, Loan and Venture.
And golem.
Logged
I currently imagine mail-mi wearing a dark trenchcoat and a bowler hat, hunched over a bit, toothpick in his mouth, holding a gun in his pocket.  One bead of sweat trickling down his nose.

'And what is it that ye shall hope for? Behold I say unto you that ye shall have hope through the atonement of Christ and the power of his resurrection, to be raised unto life eternal, and this because of your faith in him according to the promise." - Moroni 7:41, the Book of Mormon

Just a Rube

  • Golem
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 197
  • Respect: +385
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2013, 11:28:08 pm »
0

And adventurer.
Logged

Dsell

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • He/Him
  • Respect: +932
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2013, 11:52:02 pm »
0

It could easily be misinterpreted as "trash a card."
Logged
"Quiet you, you'll lynch Dsell when I'm good and ready" - Insomniac


Winner of Forum Survivor Season 2!

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11809
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (´。• ω •。`)
  • Respect: +12848
    • View Profile
    • Birds of Necama
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2013, 01:12:49 am »
0

In Dominion, discard is often paired with a lot of different descriptors - "discard down to 3 cards in hand" "discard X cards" "discard a [particular card]" "discard from play" or "discard any number of  cards". There aren't THAT many cards that have a vanilla "discard X cards" effect. Specifically, there aren't any at all in Base Dominion I think? In Intrigue, there's only Torturer? In Seaside, there's only Warehouse? Maybe I missed one or two, but it really is sort of rare. Nowhere near as common as "+X actions" or "+$X".
Also, Torturer makes opponents discard, which would still be "each other player discards", see Council Room.

Dsell: Those people who interpret -1 card as "trash a card" are probably the same people who interpret +1 card as "gain any card from the supply", so that's probably not very important.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2013, 01:15:10 am by Awaclus »
Logged
Bomb, Cannon, and many of the Gunpowder cards can strongly effect gameplay, particularly in a destructive way

The YouTube channel where I make musicDownload my band's Creative Commons albums for free

Dsell

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1290
  • He/Him
  • Respect: +932
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2013, 01:24:32 am »
0

In Dominion, discard is often paired with a lot of different descriptors - "discard down to 3 cards in hand" "discard X cards" "discard a [particular card]" "discard from play" or "discard any number of  cards". There aren't THAT many cards that have a vanilla "discard X cards" effect. Specifically, there aren't any at all in Base Dominion I think? In Intrigue, there's only Torturer? In Seaside, there's only Warehouse? Maybe I missed one or two, but it really is sort of rare. Nowhere near as common as "+X actions" or "+$X".
Also, Torturer makes opponents discard, which would still be "each other player discards", see Council Room.

Dsell: Those people who interpret -1 card as "trash a card" are probably the same people who interpret +1 card as "gain any card from the supply", so that's probably not very important.

Sure, but Donald and RGG have to think about new players as well. "Discard a card" is not ambiguous.
Logged
"Quiet you, you'll lynch Dsell when I'm good and ready" - Insomniac


Winner of Forum Survivor Season 2!

sudgy

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3431
  • Shuffle iT Username: sudgy
  • It's pronounced "SOO-jee"
  • Respect: +2706
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2013, 01:54:23 am »
+1

In Dominion, discard is often paired with a lot of different descriptors - "discard down to 3 cards in hand" "discard X cards" "discard a [particular card]" "discard from play" or "discard any number of  cards". There aren't THAT many cards that have a vanilla "discard X cards" effect. Specifically, there aren't any at all in Base Dominion I think? In Intrigue, there's only Torturer? In Seaside, there's only Warehouse? Maybe I missed one or two, but it really is sort of rare. Nowhere near as common as "+X actions" or "+$X".
Also, Torturer makes opponents discard, which would still be "each other player discards", see Council Room.

Dsell: Those people who interpret -1 card as "trash a card" are probably the same people who interpret +1 card as "gain any card from the supply", so that's probably not very important.

Sure, but Donald and RGG have to think about new players as well. "Discard a card" is not ambiguous.

"Draw a card" is less ambiguous than +1 Card.
Logged
If you're wondering what my avatar is, watch this.

Check out my logic puzzle blog!

   Quote from: sudgy on June 31, 2011, 11:47:46 pm

ashersky

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2343
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
  • Respect: +1517
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2013, 02:00:03 am »
0

What about differentiating between discarding during play and "discarding" during clean-up?

And how do you phrase Tunnel with a - notation?  Or other "and discard from your hand" style things?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

11x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, RMM46, M51

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
  • Respect: +7861
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2013, 11:38:06 am »
+1

Seems to be a definite difference.  Drawing from the top of your deck is so commonplace that "+1 card" makes sense.  In fact, you do it five times every turn. (You do not "draw your hand", you take +1 cards five times.)  The other ways to put cards in your hand (Counting House, Mine, Beggar, IGG, etc.) are infrequent and specialized.  Discarding and getting things out of your hand, on the other hand (heh), is extremely varied.  You can discard from your hand, you can play from your hand, you can place cards from your hand on top of your deck, other players can discard a card for your, other players can make you discard cards of your choice, you can discard cards from play, you can discard cards from the top of your deck, you can place cards from your deck into the discard pile (not discarding), etc.  You can also trash cards. (Why not make "-1 card" mean trash?)  Many cards respond to discarding with special rules (e.g., Tunnel).  I feel like "-1 card" just isn't precise enough.

It also breaks some symmetry.  +1 Card is always a face-down card from the top of your deck.  You don't get to choose it (though you could have set it up to be a particular card).  If -1 card meant discarding from hand, then  you have to make a choice about what card.  And you discard to the discard pile, not to the top of your deck.  The actions are actually different, not simply the reverse of one another.  And as I believe someone else mentioned: for any way you define "-1 card", it does not hold that +1 card -1 card = -1 card +1 card, so commutivity is broken as well.

Edit: Oh, also, you can discard your hand, but you can't draw your hand.  Or at least they're not the same.  Discarding your hand during cleanup allows you to discard in any order you want.  (Or do you discard simultaneously with any rearrangement you want?)  During your cleanup phase, you draw five new cards, one at a time.
« Last Edit: June 17, 2013, 11:43:42 am by Witherweaver »
Logged

dondon151

  • 2012 US Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2522
  • Respect: +1856
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2013, 11:45:46 am »
0

What about differentiating between discarding during play and "discarding" during clean-up?

And how do you phrase Tunnel with a - notation?  Or other "and discard from your hand" style things?

"If you minus this card..."

*shudder*
Logged

mail-mi

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1298
  • Shuffle iT Username: mail-mi
  • Come play some Forum Mafia with us!
  • Respect: +1364
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2013, 12:40:25 pm »
+1

Seems to be a definite difference.  Drawing from the top of your deck is so commonplace that "+1 card" makes sense.  In fact, you do it five times every turn. (You do not "draw your hand", you take +1 cards five times.)  The other ways to put cards in your hand (Counting House, Mine, Beggar, IGG, etc.) are infrequent and specialized.  Discarding and getting things out of your hand, on the other hand (heh), is extremely varied.  You can discard from your hand, you can play from your hand, you can place cards from your hand on top of your deck, other players can discard a card for your, other players can make you discard cards of your choice, you can discard cards from play, you can discard cards from the top of your deck, you can place cards from your deck into the discard pile (not discarding), etc.  You can also trash cards. (Why not make "-1 card" mean trash?)  Many cards respond to discarding with special rules (e.g., Tunnel).  I feel like "-1 card" just isn't precise enough.

It also breaks some symmetry.  +1 Card is always a face-down card from the top of your deck.  You don't get to choose it (though you could have set it up to be a particular card).  If -1 card meant discarding from hand, then  you have to make a choice about what card.  And you discard to the discard pile, not to the top of your deck.  The actions are actually different, not simply the reverse of one another.  And as I believe someone else mentioned: for any way you define "-1 card", it does not hold that +1 card -1 card = -1 card +1 card, so commutivity is broken as well.

Edit: Oh, also, you can discard your hand, but you can't draw your hand.  Or at least they're not the same.  Discarding your hand during cleanup allows you to discard in any order you want.  (Or do you discard simultaneously with any rearrangement you want?)  During your cleanup phase, you draw five new cards, one at a time.
+1 for having exactly 100 respect.
Logged
I currently imagine mail-mi wearing a dark trenchcoat and a bowler hat, hunched over a bit, toothpick in his mouth, holding a gun in his pocket.  One bead of sweat trickling down his nose.

'And what is it that ye shall hope for? Behold I say unto you that ye shall have hope through the atonement of Christ and the power of his resurrection, to be raised unto life eternal, and this because of your faith in him according to the promise." - Moroni 7:41, the Book of Mormon

Schlippy

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 203
  • Respect: +60
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #17 on: June 17, 2013, 02:21:50 pm »
0

I am pretty sure the main reason is that there is not a single card in the base game where -X cards on it makes any sense.
Logged
I do upload some Dominion videos on youtube now. :)

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
  • Respect: +7861
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #18 on: June 17, 2013, 02:24:06 pm »
+4

Seems to be a definite difference.  Drawing from the top of your deck is so commonplace that "+1 card" makes sense.  In fact, you do it five times every turn. (You do not "draw your hand", you take +1 cards five times.)  The other ways to put cards in your hand (Counting House, Mine, Beggar, IGG, etc.) are infrequent and specialized.  Discarding and getting things out of your hand, on the other hand (heh), is extremely varied.  You can discard from your hand, you can play from your hand, you can place cards from your hand on top of your deck, other players can discard a card for your, other players can make you discard cards of your choice, you can discard cards from play, you can discard cards from the top of your deck, you can place cards from your deck into the discard pile (not discarding), etc.  You can also trash cards. (Why not make "-1 card" mean trash?)  Many cards respond to discarding with special rules (e.g., Tunnel).  I feel like "-1 card" just isn't precise enough.

It also breaks some symmetry.  +1 Card is always a face-down card from the top of your deck.  You don't get to choose it (though you could have set it up to be a particular card).  If -1 card meant discarding from hand, then  you have to make a choice about what card.  And you discard to the discard pile, not to the top of your deck.  The actions are actually different, not simply the reverse of one another.  And as I believe someone else mentioned: for any way you define "-1 card", it does not hold that +1 card -1 card = -1 card +1 card, so commutivity is broken as well.

Edit: Oh, also, you can discard your hand, but you can't draw your hand.  Or at least they're not the same.  Discarding your hand during cleanup allows you to discard in any order you want.  (Or do you discard simultaneously with any rearrangement you want?)  During your cleanup phase, you draw five new cards, one at a time.
+1 for having exactly 100 respect.

Logged

Just a Rube

  • Golem
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 197
  • Respect: +385
    • View Profile
Re: "Discard a card" vs. "-1 Card"
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2013, 06:01:27 pm »
0

Seems to be a definite difference.  Drawing from the top of your deck is so commonplace that "+1 card" makes sense.  In fact, you do it five times every turn. (You do not "draw your hand", you take +1 cards five times.)  The other ways to put cards in your hand (Counting House, Mine, Beggar, IGG, etc.) are infrequent and specialized.  Discarding and getting things out of your hand, on the other hand (heh), is extremely varied.  You can discard from your hand, you can play from your hand, you can place cards from your hand on top of your deck, other players can discard a card for your, other players can make you discard cards of your choice, you can discard cards from play, you can discard cards from the top of your deck, you can place cards from your deck into the discard pile (not discarding), etc.  You can also trash cards. (Why not make "-1 card" mean trash?)  Many cards respond to discarding with special rules (e.g., Tunnel).  I feel like "-1 card" just isn't precise enough.

It also breaks some symmetry.  +1 Card is always a face-down card from the top of your deck.  You don't get to choose it (though you could have set it up to be a particular card).  If -1 card meant discarding from hand, then  you have to make a choice about what card.  And you discard to the discard pile, not to the top of your deck.  The actions are actually different, not simply the reverse of one another.  And as I believe someone else mentioned: for any way you define "-1 card", it does not hold that +1 card -1 card = -1 card +1 card, so commutivity is broken as well.

Edit: Oh, also, you can discard your hand, but you can't draw your hand.  Or at least they're not the same.  Discarding your hand during cleanup allows you to discard in any order you want.  (Or do you discard simultaneously with any rearrangement you want?)  During your cleanup phase, you draw five new cards, one at a time.
+1 for having exactly 100 respect.


+1 for your 100th post. And you can't complain about it without going to 101!
Logged
Pages: [1]
 

Page created in 0.108 seconds with 21 queries.