couple of things:
First about mcmc's post:
Well now, I was very excited to actually get to do something with my awesome pr for once and no I don't get too so I understand the frustration. I did notice robz could have been playing it up, in fact I think he was playing up the frustration(the posting about felt out of character) I'm just not sure that means he's scum again.
People are calling this out as a VT-claim. It obviously isn't a claim. If anything it is a mistake saying that he is no longer able to use his PRs... But more importantly I now have a huge townread on him. Because I do think it is a mistake and it is a mistake that only town could do. If mcmc is mafia in this situation he is automatically going to be thinking about PRs... because if he is mafia he has cool prs this game--NKs!!! what is cooler than that--so he wouldn't be able to make that mistake and say that he had nothing awesome going on. As town, it is a very easy mistake to make. I don't mind talking about it, because hey... it is out there. Mafia obviously saw it and I am not pointing anything out that is new. It sucks a bit because we have one less person that could be a NK thus making their NKs perhaps slightly more effective. But I think it was worth it in the end, because I now strongly think that mcmc is town. Top town read for me at this point..
Thus I am now pretty suspicious of people who voted for mcmc.... lio, robz, nkirtib and chairs.
Lio voted, but not about the claim.
Robz has a policy vote... I get policy votes... I do them for self voting, but they are also a good place to cover yourself. I have voted for someone as mafia for self voting and it was nice because I could hide my vote that way.
nkirbit's is also a policy vote apparently, but he doesn't have the history of policy voting in such a way.
chairs.... his vote is the most suspicious.
This is why he thinks mcmc is suspicious:
First off: mcmcsalot seems to be making a VT claim in what I had quoted; as there's no reason to make a VT claim ever, it seems reasonable to believe that he is more likely than not scum. As this is Day 1, my normal strategy (with folks that I play with IRL) is to head towards a no-lynch, but as I've been advised this is a terrible idea in practice by folks who have played this game more often than myself, I felt that as the one who the argument could be made most strongly for, he'd have my vote. That being said, forum Mafia's a bit of a different beast than I'm used to (we're making decisions in days, rather than minutes) so I can see the justification/argument made for an Unvote until we can attempt to gather more evidence.
Lots of text... He starts off talking about mcmc, but doens't expalin why it makes him more likely to be scum but in the end says very little of the paragraph about mcmc. I have done this before as mafia. Where I start out with a read and end up moving the topic of conversation away from that read within the paragraph... why? Because I actually don't have anything there and it is hard to make stuff up... so I just talk and talk and hope that no one notices that I am no longer talking about mcmc anymore...
and then there is this:
Well that's too quick of a wagon for him to be scum. Although that was a suspicious post.
This screams to me of mail-mi trying to get on the town side of mcmc's future flip (I think he will flip town, I think mail-mi perhaps knows he will flip town) but at the same time slightly advocating the votes and the lynch by admitting that it was a suspicious post.. (it wasn't...)
so right now I am most suspicious of mail-mi and chairs...
I'll vote for either...
vote: mail-mi