My reads:
Raerae - towny
mail-mi - towny
Scum to town:
Spiritbears -- Okay, I still think that Spiritbears is very possibly scum. He has still yet to provide a good answer to the EFHW/Shraeye question, and he's reacted a lot to the case. The only defense I've heard, from several people, is that Spiritbears' emotional reaction means that he's probably town.
The thing is...we've never seen Spiritbears as scum, and we've never seen a reaction like this before. I feel the back and forth has detracted from the case a fair amount, but the fact is, I've seen nothing to lessen my scum read, and the reaction doesn't read towny to me, either.
Xeiron -- There's several things here. His sheeping of Ash onto Raerae was suspicious. His accusation and statement of "How do you know there's 3 scum" at Theorel is suspicious. He's mega-lurking. All of these things push me towards scum-Xeiron.
Ahoppy -- I agree with Raerae's post where Ahoppy's been very quick to react to his lurking. More importantly, though, is that he hasn't really been lurking, but that he's active, and talking about theory, but just not getting his reads out there until prompted. I don't see any original scum-hunting coming from Ahoppy. Until he starts doing this, I'll have a scummier read on him.
Eevee -- for several of the reasons I recently listed.
EFHW - slightly scummy. She's been active and helpful, much of which was theory early on, though. I found her view on Shraeye, implying that he's likely scum, a bit too certain for that early in D1. There's also the fact that SB, who I think is scum, has been sheeping her reads. If SB flips scum, I would look very closely here.
Theorel -- I'm finding it really hard to read Theorel. He's not around much, so he always posts "catch up" posts, which are so, so hard for me to read, and they are so much easier for scum to pick and choose what they put in there. But town does the same thing, as well. I thought his theory was fine, but equally likely from town or scum, as well. I just don't have anything here, so null.
Nkirbit -- I'm having a similar problem with nkirbit that I do with Theorel. Early on, a lot of catch up posts that I don't get a scum read from but that I don't get a town read from, either. He's been more active lately, but I do agree with spiritbears that he tends to make posts that are very pro-town, but easy pro-town posts to make (the two that stick out are calling Ahoppy out for revealing info, and calling mail-mi out for asking who he should re-read. These both strike me as so obvious and so inarguably correct that I get a null read from them, if that makes any sense). I get nothing from the argument with SB on either side. Null here as well.
Ashersky -- I do this his pushing and prodding on Raerae on Eevee was designed to get information, and catch scum. The problem is, I don't know if it was designed to catch scum, or catch scummy townies. I get a slight town read, but not a large one.
Shraeye - Slight town, as well. Similar to Ashersky. I just find it unlikely that scum!shraeye would choose to push that weak of a case on me that early. I found him townier than EFHW in their argument, and while I'm not convinced there's a scum there, I think if there's 1, it's more likely EFHW.
Chairs -- I just don't think scum claims their item like that. If he's scum, he had a pregame QT, and I just think he'd have been told "Don't do that!!!" Could be a gambit, but I think that's more unlikely.
mail-mi -- I liked his re-read of Xeiron, and he does seem like he's been more active and trying to catch people. The sheeping is there, but it probably always will be, regardless of alignment. Some scummy stuff, but like everyone says, mail-mi is scummy, as scum or town. Everytime he's been scum, though, there's been HUGE red flags, and I haven't seen any HUGE red flags, just slightly scummy stuff. Given what he's been doing with scumhunting this game, I really do think hes town.
Raerae -- Nothing has really made me think she's scum whatsoever, town read here.
Author
Topic: RMM8 Innovation Inc. (Plagiarists Win!) (Read 194046 times)