Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]  All

Author Topic: Online Survivor?  (Read 12007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AdamH

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2833
  • Shuffle iT Username: Adam Horton
  • You make your own shuffle luck
    • View Profile
    • My Dominion Videos
Re: Online Survivor?
« Reply #125 on: July 17, 2013, 10:18:25 am »

Originally in the Survivor rules they were told not to talk about the game. Back when juries respected that I feel that the game was better. It's impossible to enforce now so bitter people have poisoned juries before and created voting blocs that made me unhappy.

It's just my opinion. Perhaps an effort can be made to try and prevent jurors from talking about the game. At least to not encourage them to do it by having a QT that wouldn't be good for anything else.
Logged
Visit my blog for links to a whole bunch of Dominion content I've made.

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: Online Survivor?
« Reply #126 on: July 18, 2013, 12:40:39 pm »

I agree with not being able to talk about the game. I think it would be
More fun as a jury member to get first reactions to others final tribal question/responses when they are done and be just as shocked as the players when they find out who wins.

I disagree with 2 players, I think three created infinitely more alliance choices and alot less potential for the bring the one you can beat strategy, surrounding yourself with two complete losers is tough and you look bad, you gotta figure out how to bring one obvious loser and one good candidate who you can out talk/had less allies.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Archetype

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 992
  • Suffers from Fancy Play Syndrom
    • View Profile
Re: Online Survivor?
« Reply #127 on: July 18, 2013, 12:56:35 pm »

I don't think you should have an in-game mechanic for allowing undetected conversations. I think you should do just the opposite and have a mechanic for detecting conversations.

So you can talk as much as you want with in private with people, but there is a slight chance of your message being overheard by another player. This is in place of talking as much as you want and having it always be detected, but there is a slight chance that your messaging will be private.
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: Online Survivor?
« Reply #128 on: July 18, 2013, 11:34:46 pm »

Added note from what I said in the other thread. I thin the game could really evolve if we took a bit of role playing into it, this also helps because a conversation between two people could just be about their favorite foods or anything else. But peoe would need
To be into the whole let talk because we need to get some
Water and actually just talk.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

AdamH

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2833
  • Shuffle iT Username: Adam Horton
  • You make your own shuffle luck
    • View Profile
    • My Dominion Videos
Re: Online Survivor?
« Reply #129 on: July 22, 2013, 12:23:55 am »

F2 vs F3 has long been an area of disagreement.

Regardless of what actually happens, I'm quite certain that the mods shouldn't tell us which is happening until right before the final immunity challenge, though.  ;D
Logged
Visit my blog for links to a whole bunch of Dominion content I've made.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]  All
 

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 19 queries.