Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Repeated material  (Read 1639 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AJD

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3296
  • Shuffle iT Username: AJD
  • Respect: +4443
    • View Profile
Repeated material
« on: November 16, 2012, 01:12:40 am »
0

I really don't think we need the entire Secret History of Knights, for example, on the page for each Knight. Any comments specific to that Knight (or Ruins or Shelter or whatever) can go on that page, and then there can be an overall link to "see also the overall Secret History of Knights". Same applies to FAQs and rule clarifications.
Logged

ftl

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2056
  • Shuffle iT Username: ftl
  • Respect: +1345
    • View Profile
Re: Repeated material
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2012, 02:10:23 am »
0

I've been repeating it because I haven't felt like editing out just the parts of the Secret History that apply to each Knight. It seemed like it wouldn't make sense without context. I guess I'll just link instead.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2012, 02:16:44 am by ftl »
Logged

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: Repeated material
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2012, 02:46:51 pm »
0

Does each knight actually need its own page?
Logged

DStu

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2627
  • Respect: +1490
    • View Profile
Re: Repeated material
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2012, 04:25:09 pm »
+1

Does each knight actually need its own page?
we need an inclusionism vs. deletionism debate. every proper wiki needs those.
Logged
Pages: [1]
 

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 20 queries.