Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  All

Author Topic: STAR WARS  (Read 22041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

greatexpectations

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1097
  • Respect: +1067
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2012, 09:20:06 am »
0

Carrie fisher was on wait wait don't tell me a while ago, and she said that Lucas had not told hen that she and Luke were siblings

My guess?  He made it up later an didn't think about it.

She also said that the metal bikini didn't fit to her skin (being metal and all) and that boba fett could see all they way down to Florida when he was standing behind her

oh i totally don't doubt that lucas just made things up as he went along. i just enjoy trying to spin things in an absurd way to try to make them work. especially when it involves painting the bad guy in a better light.
Logged
momomoto: ...I looked at the tableau and went "Mountebank? That's for jerks."
rrenaud: Jerks win.

Ozle

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3625
  • Sorry, this text is personal.
  • Respect: +3360
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #26 on: October 31, 2012, 09:20:28 am »
0

Argh, if Wheldon is involved then all of a sudden I will lose any interest.
Thats not the direction I want it to go in!!
Logged
Try the Ozle Google Map Challenge!
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=7466.0

Sullying players Enjoyment of Innovation since 2013 Apparently!

Captain_Frisk

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1257
  • Respect: +1263
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #27 on: October 31, 2012, 09:29:20 am »
+3

Argh, if Wheldon is involved then all of a sudden I will lose any interest.
Thats not the direction I want it to go in!!

I too am an uwe boll fan.

Logged
I support funsockets.... taking as much time as they need to get it right.

Ozle

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3625
  • Sorry, this text is personal.
  • Respect: +3360
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #28 on: October 31, 2012, 09:32:35 am »
0

Argh, if Wheldon is involved then all of a sudden I will lose any interest.
Thats not the direction I want it to go in!!

I too am an uwe boll fan.

Hahaha, I thought he had quit these days?
Logged
Try the Ozle Google Map Challenge!
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=7466.0

Sullying players Enjoyment of Innovation since 2013 Apparently!

jsh357

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2577
  • Shuffle iT Username: jsh357
  • Respect: +4340
    • View Profile
    • JSH Gaming: Original games
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #29 on: October 31, 2012, 09:36:19 am »
0

Cautiously optimistic.  On one hand, Lucas has driven the series in to the ground and Disney probably can't do any worse.  On the other hand, Jar Jar fits the Disney canon like a glove.

Also:
Now a Shia LaBeouf Indiana Jones reboot is practically guaranteed.
Logged
Join the Dominion community Discord channel! Chat in text and voice; enter dumb tournaments; spy on top players!

https://discord.gg/2rDpJ4N

DG

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4074
  • Respect: +2624
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2012, 10:17:13 am »
0

It again might be heresy, but the theme should probably be pitched now for a slightly younger audience with less politics and more fantasy. Adult audiences have long since lost the novelty of a fantasy escapade set in futuristic spaceships and Star Wars doesn't work as thought provoking sci-fi.
Logged

greatexpectations

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1097
  • Respect: +1067
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2012, 10:19:30 am »
+1

3) Admiral Thrawn on screen? Cross fingers.

star wars episode VII - game of thrawns
Logged
momomoto: ...I looked at the tableau and went "Mountebank? That's for jerks."
rrenaud: Jerks win.

Ozle

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3625
  • Sorry, this text is personal.
  • Respect: +3360
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #32 on: October 31, 2012, 10:23:43 am »
0


Now a Shia LaBeouf Indiana Jones reboot is practically guaranteed.

Highly unlikely considering the comments he made last time...thank goodness

They should just do it like Bond and have a new actor when needed.
Logged
Try the Ozle Google Map Challenge!
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=7466.0

Sullying players Enjoyment of Innovation since 2013 Apparently!

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #33 on: October 31, 2012, 11:11:11 am »
0


Now a Shia LaBeouf Indiana Jones reboot is practically guaranteed.

Highly unlikely considering the comments he made last time...thank goodness

They should just do it like Bond and have a new actor when needed.
Or make one about Henry Jones: Sean Connery.
Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8172
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Let me tell you a secret...
  • Respect: +9630
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #34 on: October 31, 2012, 11:25:10 am »
+1

Argh, if Wheldon is involved then all of a sudden I will lose any interest.
Thats not the direction I want it to go in!!

I too am an uwe boll fan.

See, I want Andrew Stanton to direct these.  I actually very much enjoyed John Carter, and I'd love to see what that man would do with Star Wars.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

sandstorm

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
  • Respect: +32
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #35 on: October 31, 2012, 08:39:26 pm »
+2

If you aren't offended by some pretty dark humour and have 70 to 90 minutes to spare then the Mr. Plinkett Star Wars Prequel reviews on www.redlettermedia.com are well made and entertaining
Logged

jsh357

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2577
  • Shuffle iT Username: jsh357
  • Respect: +4340
    • View Profile
    • JSH Gaming: Original games
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #36 on: October 31, 2012, 11:18:23 pm »
+1

If you aren't offended by some pretty dark humour and have 70 to 90 minutes to spare then the Mr. Plinkett Star Wars Prequel reviews on www.redlettermedia.com are well made and entertaining

I would think everyone has watched 'em by now, but I second that.  RLM have to be the best video criticism producers on the internet.  Their review of Jack and Jill was the coolest deconstruction I've seen of a bad movie since... well, the Star Wars reviews.
Logged
Join the Dominion community Discord channel! Chat in text and voice; enter dumb tournaments; spy on top players!

https://discord.gg/2rDpJ4N

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8172
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Let me tell you a secret...
  • Respect: +9630
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #37 on: October 31, 2012, 11:23:19 pm »
+1

So we have to ask ourselves - will Disney make a Curse of the Black Pearl?  Or will they make a Country Bears?
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

sandstorm

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
  • Respect: +32
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2012, 01:04:52 am »
0

If you aren't offended by some pretty dark humour and have 70 to 90 minutes to spare then the Mr. Plinkett Star Wars Prequel reviews on www.redlettermedia.com are well made and entertaining

I would think everyone has watched 'em by now, but I second that.  RLM have to be the best video criticism producers on the internet.  Their review of Jack and Jill was the coolest deconstruction I've seen of a bad movie since... well, the Star Wars reviews.

The funny thing is, despite how much they tore into Jack and Jill, in their latest episode of 'Half in the Bag' they called it a masterpiece compared to Paranormal Activity 4
Logged

sandstorm

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 57
  • Respect: +32
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2012, 01:09:41 am »
+1

So we have to ask ourselves - will Disney make a Curse of the Black Pearl?  Or will they make a Country Bears?

I am quite optimistic that Disney will treat the Star Wars franchise well.  Disney is a business and if their employees do not produce quality work they will face consequences.  When George Lucas made the prequels he had no one to be accountable to, except himself.
Logged

gman314

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 589
  • Respect: +281
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2012, 10:53:34 pm »
+1

3) Admiral Thrawn on screen? Cross fingers.

star wars episode VII - game of thrawns

Episode VIII - Kashyyyk of Kings.
Logged

chwhite

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1065
  • Respect: +442
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #41 on: November 12, 2012, 07:17:57 pm »
+1

I will say this for the prequels:  they got better as they went along.  Episode III was mostly kinda decent, actually.  II would have been passable without the romantic subplot, which was handled about as poorly as possible.  Episode I... the less said the better.

I assume at least some of you have seen the proposals to view Star Wars in machete order?  I think there's a lot of sense to it.
Logged
To discard or not to discard?  That is the question.

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1762
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +2019
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #42 on: November 12, 2012, 07:30:24 pm »
0

I assume at least some of you have seen the proposals to view Star Wars in machete order?  I think there's a lot of sense to it.

Yeah, some friends and I are thinking of trying that out. The suggestion has been made to drop Episode I altogether. Personally, I think Darth Maul almost makes the whole thing worth it.

Edit: Right, okay, that's exactly what Machete order is. Carry on.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2012, 07:41:19 pm by Jimmmmm »
Logged

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
  • Respect: +2221
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2012, 08:38:42 am »
+1

Yeah, some friends and I are thinking of trying that out. The suggestion has been made to drop Episode I altogether. Personally, I think Darth Maul almost makes the whole thing worth it.

I thought that Darth Maul was terrible. Not the way he fought or how the actor played him. He was used poorly in the story.

He drew more excitement in the trailers than he did in the movie, which might have been his role all along. In the movie, he's this mysterious figure. Who is he? How did he become a Sith? What does he do when he's not Palpatine's errand boy? These pressing questions—and many more—will not be answered in this movie. Up yours, viewer.

The most personality we see from him is when he's pacing like a cat during the force field sequence. The pacing was great, but that was it. Then there's more fighting. He does something stupid. He gets killed.

Just like the rest of Phantom Menace, Darth Maul had potential that was pissed away. 
Logged
A man has no signature

Davio

  • 2012 Dutch Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4787
  • Respect: +3413
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2012, 09:07:10 am »
0

Logged

BSG: Cagprezimal Adama
Mage Knight: Arythea

Cuzz

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 624
  • Shuffle iT Username: Cuzz
  • Respect: +1021
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #45 on: November 13, 2012, 09:41:13 am »
0

I've been planning a star wars viewing party and I am totally doing machete order now. That is brilliant.
Logged

Kuildeous

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3840
  • Respect: +2221
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #46 on: November 13, 2012, 11:42:36 am »
0

I read the Machete Order. The way he explains it makes a lot of sense. As he admitted, it's not perfect, but it looks pretty good. It retains the shock of Episode V. And it does sound like watching III and VI back-to-back would provide a nice compare-and-contrast between Luke and Anakin.
Logged
A man has no signature

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8172
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Let me tell you a secret...
  • Respect: +9630
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #47 on: November 13, 2012, 12:50:41 pm »
+1

Maybe it's because I was 9 when it came out, but I actually have a fondness for Episode I, and even view it as a stronger movie than the other two prequels.  So while I definitely would try Machete order, I'd want to somehow sneak Episode I in there.  Probably after Return of the Jedi.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1762
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
  • Respect: +2019
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #48 on: November 13, 2012, 12:56:10 pm »
0

Maybe it's because I was 9 when it came out

This. Jar Jar is pretty awesome when you're a kid.
Logged

DStu

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2627
  • Respect: +1490
    • View Profile
Re: STAR WARS
« Reply #49 on: November 13, 2012, 01:03:34 pm »
0

Maybe it's because I was 9 when it came out

This. Jar Jar is pretty awesome when you're a kid.

... and I thought Episode:I was considered to age well ...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  All
 

Page created in 0.089 seconds with 20 queries.