That's the question.
I played this game vs. Roger Rabbit:
http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201209/28/game-20120928-023049-913e0c96.htmlOn turn 16 I had the option to end it with a tie as player 2. Pawn was the only source of +Buy, but none of us bought one.
I actually thought for a bit whether to play it safe or play for the win. I really thought that my deck was a bit better so it might be worth it to grab a Duchy, hope he doesn't buy the last Province or a Duchy himself and get the last Province.
Already, there are a lot of if's and buts and in the end I chose certainty and grabbed the tie.
What would you have done here? Would you have played for the win or taken the tie?
Deck stats:
Opponent: [26 cards] 2 Caravans, 2 Rabbles, 2 Villages, 1 Throne Room, 7 Coppers, 2 Silvers, 3 Golds, 3 Estates, 4 Provinces
Me: [26 cards] 3 Caravans, 2 Rabbles, 2 Throne Rooms, 2 Villages, 1 Adventurer, 1 Mine, 4 Coppers, 1 Silver, 3 Golds, 3 Estates, 3 Provinces
I have an extra Caravan, an extra Throne Room, less Coppers a Mine and an Adventurer which could help against his Rabbles and with my own greening. Both of us are at new clean shuffles at this point. He has just reshuffled and I would do the same after this turn.
In hindsight, we can see he has Rabble collision on Turn 16 and would be hard pressed to grab even a Duchy. My draw was also less than stellar but I could have bought a Duchy. All of this was of course not known when I to make a decision.
Also consider that once I start dipping for Duchies, grabbing the last Province isn't automatic anymore, but I had Mine which could have helped with that.