I disagree slightly with Robz about voting. The thing is, people generally don't properly defend themselves until they think they could have their head on the chopping block, and that only happens as votes pile onto them. There is a chance of an early hammer, but that, on day 1, isn't a problem. We have regular vote totals, and if someone were to hammer to early, well, that's an obviously scummy thing to do. Enough that you'd probably get lynched the following day. It could happen accidentally, but not if people are paying attention.
Kuildeous' defence about No Lynch... doesn't strike me as suspicious. I can see where he's coming from, and I get more of a 'I don't want to lynch yet' rather than a 'let's waste the day yo' vibe from him. In this game, we only stand to lose by no lynching. We're better voting randomly than no lynching, as we might hit mafia, while the mafia will definitely hit town with their extra kill.
In fact, I'm beginning to get a bad vibe from Robz. The things he's chosen to respond to aren't exactly... the most relevant things he could have been picking out. Information, not analysis, type posts. Slightly worrying.