What I meant was that you have basically repeated your claim multiple times, tying it to you being town. That action in and of itself isn't alignment-indicative, but I think that it is more often repeated when the claim is fake.
To me, the first claim was fine. When it has been discussed by you in subsequent posts, though, it reads as though you are just repeating the same language. There are aspects that seem like you are being careful not to mess up the claim. And no "new" information came with any subsequent posts.
Like, a quick example below. Imagine each new line is a new post, with the game going on between.
"I'm a cop."
"No, I don't want to share results."
"I think it's better if I don't."
"Fine, I got innocent on X."
"Yes, I know they already flipped, so it's convenient."
"I targeted Y on N2 but got no result."
That's sort of a normal chain of a cop claim. It's definitely fake-able, but makes sense. Here's how your thread reads to me:
"I know there's poison in the game but I'm no poisoner, so you should definitely assume I'm a poison doctor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
"Okay, yeah, you got my super subtle hint there. I'm a poison doctor."
"Yeah, I'm a poison doctor."
"The word poison might show up in a flip because I'm a poison doctor."
"Poison doctor poison doctor. Two words are important. Poison doctor."
"Poison. Doctor."
"If I flip town, you'll know I'm poison doctor without the word poison. Poison Doctor. If I flip red, I'm lying. Poison Doctor."
"P-p-p-poisoooooooooon Doctor!"
You "full claimed" after a long run of that and no one really liking it. That is what I mean about your double-down.