Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[cayvie]

So with the change in setup? is there a reason not get house info on the table now?

What's the benefit?

To clarify my stance

In general, I am against mass claiming, as it reduces the agency of each individual, and most individuals are town.

[Greathallscout]

So with the change in setup? is there a reason not get house info on the table now?

What's the benefit?

To clarify my stance

In general, I am against mass claiming, as it reduces the agency of each individual, and most individuals are town.

I think it is likely the scum are equally distributed among the houses so it might help for scumhunting.

[cayvie]

So with the change in setup? is there a reason not get house info on the table now?

What's the benefit?

To clarify my stance

In general, I am against mass claiming, as it reduces the agency of each individual, and most individuals are town.

I think it is likely the scum are equally distributed among the houses so it might help for scumhunting.

Can you give me a concrete scenario in which this information would help, and in which it would be important to claim now instead of later?

[Greathallscout]

A stealing pact would redistribute spheres from people who use them to people who don't, which seems most likely to be negative utility (depending somewhat on what powers scum has).

If people set out different numbers of spheres, you're right. But if the number is part of the pact and everyone follows it, everyone gets the same benefit. Although like MiX said, forcing balance may not be good.

I'm a fan of fleshing out a version of the Stealing-pact. NO-pact seems mediocre. NON-stealing pact seems to give scum all of their spheres charged guaranteed and a chance to steal as well.

[MiX]

Vote: EFHW

Mix are you 3p again?

What do you mean again? Oh, wait, you were in the SK game.

No, I'm town this time around, why do you ask?

[cayvie]

Vote: EFHW

Mix are you 3p again?

What do you mean again? Oh, wait, you were in the SK game.

No, I'm town this time around, why do you ask?

Seems like you're playing to survive

[Greathallscout]

So with the change in setup? is there a reason not get house info on the table now?

What's the benefit?

To clarify my stance

In general, I am against mass claiming, as it reduces the agency of each individual, and most individuals are town.

I think it is likely the scum are equally distributed among the houses so it might help for scumhunting.

Can you give me a concrete scenario in which this information would help, and in which it would be important to claim now instead of later?

I guess simply that if i think 3 people in a house are towny and the 4th seems scummy it will make me more confident on a lynch.

[cayvie]

So with the change in setup? is there a reason not get house info on the table now?

What's the benefit?

To clarify my stance

In general, I am against mass claiming, as it reduces the agency of each individual, and most individuals are town.

I think it is likely the scum are equally distributed among the houses so it might help for scumhunting.

Can you give me a concrete scenario in which this information would help, and in which it would be important to claim now instead of later?

I guess simply that if i think 3 people in a house are towny and the 4th seems scummy it will make me more confident on a lynch.

I can see that coming up if there are two wagons you're split between joining

[Greathallscout]

So with the change in setup? is there a reason not get house info on the table now?

What's the benefit?

To clarify my stance

In general, I am against mass claiming, as it reduces the agency of each individual, and most individuals are town.

This "house" type of claiming doesn't seems to take away much.

[Glooble]

vote: chairs

Wagons are good. This joth-gambit feels townie.

[Glooble]

Am I reading the setup post right in that scum has access to the same basic set of possible powers as town? If that's true, wouldn't a no-stealing pact benefit town more on the balance? Since there's more of us?

[LaLight]

what the hell three pages. i will read tomorrow.

[Glooble]

what the hell three pages. i will read tomorrow.

By which time it will be 12 pages.

[LaLight]

what the hell three pages. i will read tomorrow.

By which time it will be 12 pages.

i will have 2 hours more or less

[Rhand]

vote MiX

Serious vote. Will explain tomorrow when I’m sober.
1:20 am now and preeettty drunk

[Jimmmmm]

Checking in. After all these years I finally changed my page size from 25 to 50. The game seems much more manageable now!

[Rhand]

The nested quotes on this forum are hard to digest

[WestCoastDidds]

vote MiX

Serious vote. Will explain tomorrow when I’m sober.
1:20 am now and preeettty drunk

Oh, Rhand! You’re our kind of people

[WestCoastDidds]

I'm personally hard no on the stealing pact and vote: jotheonah because HARD NO on ever suggesting no lynch D1.

Vote: chairs in honor of Shraeye

[MiX]

I think that means he's town.

[Greathallscout]

Am I reading the setup post right in that scum has access to the same basic set of possible powers as town? If that's true, wouldn't a no-stealing pact benefit town more on the balance? Since there's more of us?

This is a good point to put into the considerations for what to do. I'm all for a chairs lynch because joth seems towny but I think we should hear from everyone and iron out a theft-decision before we hammer.

[EFHW]

A stealing pact would redistribute spheres from people who use them to people who don't, which seems most likely to be negative utility (depending somewhat on what powers scum has).

Just to be clear, I wasn't serious!

[cayvie]

Am I reading the setup post right in that scum has access to the same basic set of possible powers as town? If that's true, wouldn't a no-stealing pact benefit town more on the balance? Since there's more of us?

This is a good point to put into the considerations for what to do. I'm all for a chairs lynch because joth seems towny but I think we should hear from everyone and iron out a theft-decision before we hammer.

I'll put it this way. I am not making any promises beforehand about any action I may take on a given night slash during a given Mana tornado.

[EFHW]

Nice details mail-mi!

Sounds like Eddie is claiming Wit, a mysterious fellow who also goes by Hoid and appears in all the cosmere books, not just this series.

vote: joth. No lynch seems bad for town and his reasons were strange.

EFHW are you scum again?

No! Can't you tell?

[MiX]

Am I reading the setup post right in that scum has access to the same basic set of possible powers as town? If that's true, wouldn't a no-stealing pact benefit town more on the balance? Since there's more of us?

This is a good point to put into the considerations for what to do. I'm all for a chairs lynch because joth seems towny but I think we should hear from everyone and iron out a theft-decision before we hammer.

I'll put it this way. I am not making any promises beforehand about any action I may take on a given night slash during a given Mana tornado.

I also think each individual House should deal with that problem.

Nice details mail-mi!

Sounds like Eddie is claiming Wit, a mysterious fellow who also goes by Hoid and appears in all the cosmere books, not just this series.

vote: joth. No lynch seems bad for town and his reasons were strange.

EFHW are you scum again?

No! Can't you tell?

How would we be able to tell before this post?

Who was I voting for? Cayvie? Hmm...

Vote: chairs