Sigh. It's interesting to me that my first game aspect has only been used to cite things to my detriment, i.e my not voting for either raptor or mail-mi is just because I haven't played any games with you to have a good ability to read. Especially D1, when there's so little to go, except making arguments based on strategy.
How SHOULD we cite your first-game aspect?
um, like I said right there - reread the i.e.
I think I'm one of the few that argued strongly for not revealing either round claim or # claim, which I still think was a very bad idea as town. It seems reasonable to think that there was no scum nk on N1 because they, knowing she was #1, tried to kill WDD, but someone else saved them. Or who knows, maybe she's the poisoned one and is already dying.
"Claiming numbers is very bad for town...it's the only thing that save Didds who was the scum kill".
I don't see how you expect me to understand what you mean
There was no way (unless you have are town and have a saving role) to:
• know that anyone had a saving role - since we don't know for certain what item are (though, of course, we can make strong assumptions on some)
• know that if the items did exist, they were picked by town
• that the saving role person would try to save Didds
So, by claiming draft #, Didds just made herself a target
The fact that she wasn't killed N1 doesn't after the fact mean the idea to claim was a good idea.
And like I said, while she survived the NK, she might still be poisoned and not even know it.