I guess what I don't quite see is that MiX is trying to protect joth when he actually voted for joth a lot, says he's okay with the wagon, and generally just flipflops all over the place. To me that is more indicative of scum changing reads on town opportunistically.
You attributing standard scum behavior to MiX is laughable. That cat wouldn't play expectedly if you paid him.
So Space coming to the conclusion that joth is scum based on MiX's behaviour is fine, but when I come to a different conclusion then suddenly you can't possibly make conclusions based on his behaviour?
Wait.. that's not a fair representation of why I think Joth is scum at all.
I came to the conclusion Joth was scum based on D1 reads and what I think was a very minor scumslip. Early in the game, I was townreading MiX over his casual-sounding response to my "MixFaurd" joke, so that scumread on Joth was non-MiX-dependent.
Then I thought it was a bit off that MiX was jumping around making it difficult to get my preferred lynch through in the runup to the D1 deadline. I keep coming back to that because I was actually feeling quite cross at the time about how much time-wasting his flitting was causing for anyone else trying to keep up. I pointed out at #545 that it could even look like partner-protecting, which might be worth remembering later (i.e. if one of them later flips scum). You could have objected to that comment at the time, but didn't make any response, as far as I can remember.
Meanwhile, Joth, a claimed doctor, doesn't get NKd. That's another MiX-independent piece of evidence against Joth.
Then finally MiX flips scum thanks to a cop result. Going back to my "that might be telling for later" comment, I now have another piece of evidence that makes Joth look suspicious. Sure, Raerae could be right that MiX's behaviour could have been every bit as annoying and/or unpredictable as town as he was as traitor, but it's not the only thing making me vote Joth.