Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 92 93 [94] 95 96 ... 123  All

Author Topic: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (GAME OVER, Maquis win!)  (Read 377611 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

WestCoastDidds

  • Ambassador
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 33
  • Shuffle iT Username: WestCoastDidds
  • Didds, ya'll
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2325 on: March 26, 2019, 08:35:42 pm »

I did, Eddie. Scroll up. I’m on my phone, otherwise I’d do it for you.

MiX quoted you for me, you good.

Sweet. Apologies for being terse.  Thanks, MiX.
Logged
classic Diddsian meddling
I never got to read what Didds said, but whatever she's saying, she's right.

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2326 on: March 27, 2019, 02:02:53 am »

Ima borrow this, because it makes me happy and I want to look back at it a lot:

Possible MU
EFHW
Space
MiX
UncleEddie
raerae                       
Possible MQ
UoS
Didds
MiX
Ash
Uncle
raerae



Possible MU
EFHW
Space
MiX
UncleEddie
raerae                       
Possible MQ
UoS
Didds
MiX
Ash
Uncle
raerae                       
Possible SK
UoS
Didds
MiX
Ash
Uncle
raerae
EFHW
Space

At least 3 scum hiding in here, possibly 5(!).

At this point it might be best for everyone else to role claim...? I am uncertain. I know that knowing who everyone is seems highly productive, but also productive for the scum . I don't know who benefits more, only that I personally would benefit, and I am feeling selfish.

I have more opinions, like a gut read on an SK candidate, and that I will never play a game with more than 1 scum team again, etc.
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3377
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2327 on: March 27, 2019, 02:07:21 am »

I don't know who benefits more, only that I personally would benefit, and I am feeling selfish.
How would you benefit?
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2328 on: March 27, 2019, 02:08:49 am »

It makes me happy knowing things like that.
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2329 on: March 27, 2019, 02:45:38 am »

It makes me happy knowing things like that.

Tell me precisely and exactly how outing commuter and bulletproof helps town, among the other roles. This just looks like misdirection.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3377
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2330 on: March 27, 2019, 02:55:36 am »

We have not talked probability in a while. I am redoing those calculations trying to take everything that we know inot account. The relevant data is:

- I am IC
- ash, WCD, UoS are not MU
- the Neighbors, DatSwan and shraeye could never have been SK
- DatSwan did not target the SK N2

This gives me a result of

SK + Maquis: 84%
MU + Maquis: 16%
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2331 on: March 27, 2019, 03:10:53 am »

It makes me happy knowing things like that.

Tell me precisely and exactly how outing commuter and bulletproof helps town, among the other roles. This just looks like misdirection.

It might not, which is why I asked.

And said it was selfish.
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2332 on: March 27, 2019, 03:22:37 am »

It makes me happy knowing things like that.

Tell me precisely and exactly how outing commuter and bulletproof helps town, among the other roles. This just looks like misdirection.

It might not, which is why I asked.

And said it was selfish.

Okay, I'll answer: it doesn't. We won't magically get better reads by outing PRs, that makes no sense and it's anti-town. If you have a REAL reason to out them, something concrete that makes a certain role townier/scummier, say what it is: scum won't fake claim anyway. Otherwise this is strictly anti-town.
Logged

faust

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3377
  • Shuffle iT Username: faust
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2333 on: March 27, 2019, 03:26:55 am »

Vote: Eddie
Logged
You say the ocean's rising, like I give a shit
You say the whole world's ending, honey it already did

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2334 on: March 27, 2019, 03:31:24 am »

Oh my goodness, at least let everyone respond first.
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2335 on: March 27, 2019, 03:36:30 am »

Oh my goodness, at least let everyone respond first.

Where IS everyone? It's been like 7 hours since I voted and no one talked about it. Was it dead o'clock for the rest of the world too?
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2336 on: March 27, 2019, 04:04:52 am »

Uncle: who do you think is the Maquis team? And why? If this is hard to answer, who's the most likely partner with Snow?
Logged

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2337 on: March 27, 2019, 04:11:28 am »

Didds/Snow
Didds/Ash
Ash/Mix
Maaaybe Snow/MiX

Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2338 on: March 27, 2019, 04:13:13 am »

Roughly in that order, and that is based on instinct, and not much else.

Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2339 on: March 27, 2019, 05:01:14 am »

Didds/Snow
Didds/Ash
Ash/Mix
Maaaybe Snow/MiX

Why is raerae towny?
Logged

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2340 on: March 27, 2019, 05:07:36 am »

Also, why aren't you voting for Didds then?
Logged

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2341 on: March 27, 2019, 05:16:16 am »

I would happily Vote: Didds

See?

If I were to trust only my own opinion things would be different, as it stands, I am going to vote for who people want to vote for the most, and it wasn’t (isn’t?) Didds, so I voted Snow.

That being said, I could just as easily Vote: MiX or Vote: Ash

But I think I will stick to my Vote: Snow for now.

Also, Raerae isn’t townie. Raerae just isn’t scummy.
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2342 on: March 27, 2019, 05:38:50 am »

I would happily Vote: Didds

See?

If I were to trust only my own opinion things would be different, as it stands, I am going to vote for who people want to vote for the most, and it wasn’t (isn’t?) Didds, so I voted Snow.

That being said, I could just as easily Vote: MiX or Vote: Ash

But I think I will stick to my Vote: Snow for now.

Also, Raerae isn’t townie. Raerae just isn’t scummy.

Why are you useless...all your votes are meaningless. Who else would you trust? You have more information than non-Maquis folk so you can PoE MUCH better, use and abuse this.
Logged

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2343 on: March 27, 2019, 05:48:32 am »

I trust no one else fully in that block of 6. I trust you ever so slightly, although that is waning. But it is enough for me to resist your lynch for the time being.

I trust Didds in roughly half of her posts and think she is scum in the other half.

I had a gut scum read of Snow day one which faded and then resurged, and Ash’s comments about his hammer is far scummier than his hammer. So I am taking that into account as well.


Do you think I am scum? Or just useless? Are you going to vote for me? Or just point at me?
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2344 on: March 27, 2019, 05:53:28 am »

Do you think I am scum? Or just useless? Are you going to vote for me? Or just point at me?

Both and I am voting for you.

Vote: Eddie, in case people scan for Eddie instead of Uncle
Logged

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2345 on: March 27, 2019, 05:54:16 am »

L-2 remember
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2346 on: March 27, 2019, 05:56:13 am »

Also, that’s quite a flip from you saying I am probably town to voting for me. Seems opportunistic.
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2347 on: March 27, 2019, 06:10:28 am »

Also, that’s quite a flip from you saying I am probably town to voting for me. Seems opportunistic.

Opportunistic would be me sheeping you. I can't lift a finger without someone saying I'm obv!scum because of it and I'm tired. I'm done, call me scummy, call me scum, but right now I see a good case and the person I think is most likely to be scum not doing anything of their own.
Logged

Uncleeurope

  • Pawn
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2348 on: March 27, 2019, 06:19:42 am »

What changed between you calling me likely town and voting me?
Logged
Don't worry, no one can read uncle correctly.

Uncleeurope Eddie

MiX

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 77
  • Shuffle iT Username: MiX
  • It's me.
    • View Profile
Re: RMM52: Deep Space Nine Mafia Redux (Day 4)
« Reply #2349 on: March 27, 2019, 06:26:56 am »

What changed between you calling me likely town and voting me?

Me realizing that you or Snow is scum + ash/didds is very unlikely + didds/snow is very unlikely + raerae is town. Then my gut read says didds is scummier than ash, and if you put it all together you'll realize it makes you scum.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 92 93 [94] 95 96 ... 123  All
 

Page created in 0.464 seconds with 20 queries.