Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 180 181 [182] 183 184 ... 195  All

Author Topic: Weekly Design Contest Thread  (Read 184219 times)

1 Member and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

NoMoreFun

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1549
  • Respect: +1176
    • View Profile
Re: Contest #58: Double Double
« Reply #4525 on: January 19, 2020, 05:54:02 pm »
+1



A Procession variant whose upgrading portion is optional instead of mandatory.

Procession was changed to exclude Durations due to new rules around tracking.

Another option would be to adopt similar wording to Improve (ie you do the upgrading when you discard the card from play),  which wpuld allow it to be played with Durations. I also don't think the card would be too strong if you could turn Actions into non Actions, or if the trashing was "up to".
Logged

Gubump

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 720
  • Respect: +437
    • View Profile
Re: Contest #58: Double Double
« Reply #4526 on: January 19, 2020, 06:00:14 pm »
0



A Procession variant whose upgrading portion is optional instead of mandatory.

Procession was changed to exclude Durations due to new rules around tracking.

Another option would be to adopt similar wording to Improve (ie you do the upgrading when you discard the card from play),  which wpuld allow it to be played with Durations. I also don't think the card would be too strong if you could turn Actions into non Actions, or if the trashing was "up to".

Thanks, I completely forgot about that! Fixed, and buffed by changing the cost restriction to "up to."
Logged
All of my fan card mockups are credited to Violet CLM and his Dominion Card Image Generator.

mad4math

  • Chancellor
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 24
  • Shuffle iT Username: madd4math
  • Respect: +66
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4527 on: January 19, 2020, 10:15:29 pm »
+2

Quote
$8 Project
When you buy this, set aside an action card from your hand. Whenever you play a copy of that card from your hand, play it again.
Logged

scolapasta

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 219
  • Respect: +164
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4528 on: January 20, 2020, 06:18:32 am »
0

Duration Throne Room is weak but with +1 Card it's a decent cantrip. Compare to Scheme; probably right for $4, trading flexibility and stackability (if it says "non Duration") for +1 Card and Action next turn (if it connects). It will miss reshuffles which I think keeps it below $5.

Scheme is a great comparison! In fact, one of my other alternatives was to find a way to have it "wait" until an attack came.

SO that makes me feel better about v2a. It's like scheme for attacks that, as you point out, gets you +1 Card and Action next turn when it hits; and if misses, attacks both turns instead.

And 2b is at worst a cantrip that attacks if it misses.

(thematically you start the siege, slowing down their supplies, and if you succeed (have another attack card), hit them extra hard for two turns)

This card clearly will slow games down; that works for me as I think cards that alter the gameplay can be interesting. i.e. in games with Siege Tower, it's going to be more of a slog (I mean, you are under siege), so you'll need to find ways to mitigate for that.

Still willing to hear other thoughts on 2a vs 2b vs any tweaks.
Logged
Feel free to join us at scolapasta's cards for discussion on any of my custom cards.

Snowyowl

  • Scout
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
  • Respect: +71
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4529 on: January 20, 2020, 10:40:08 am »
+1

48 hour warning!

There's a lot of good entries this week - it'll be great to read through them again but hard to pick one winner.
Logged

Something_Smart

  • Salvager
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
  • Respect: +62
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4530 on: January 20, 2020, 11:01:15 am »
+1

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.
Logged

spineflu

  • Tactician
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • Shuffle iT Username: spineflu
  • +1 Coffers, +1 Respect
  • Respect: +205
    • View Profile
    • my instagram, where i paint things
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4531 on: January 20, 2020, 04:25:20 pm »
0

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games

Gubump

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 720
  • Respect: +437
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4532 on: January 20, 2020, 05:25:27 pm »
0

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games

Not that much more than Jester, I don't think. That said, I think it's almost certainly too weak. Just + is too weak for (Legionary) and I think this is going to be weaker than that most of the time.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2020, 05:27:42 pm by Gubump »
Logged
All of my fan card mockups are credited to Violet CLM and his Dominion Card Image Generator.

spineflu

  • Tactician
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • Shuffle iT Username: spineflu
  • +1 Coffers, +1 Respect
  • Respect: +205
    • View Profile
    • my instagram, where i paint things
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4533 on: January 20, 2020, 06:21:34 pm »
0

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games

Not that much more than Jester, I don't think. That said, I think it's almost certainly too weak. Just + is too weak for (Legionary) and I think this is going to be weaker than that most of the time.

jester, only one person is getting a card at a time. this is tossing out 4+ copies each time its played.

Gubump

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 720
  • Respect: +437
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4534 on: January 20, 2020, 06:43:11 pm »
0

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games

Not that much more than Jester, I don't think. That said, I think it's almost certainly too weak. Just + is too weak for (Legionary) and I think this is going to be weaker than that most of the time.

jester, only one person is getting a card at a time. this is tossing out 4+ copies each time its played.

Jester gives out one card per player who revealed a non-Victory card. Knight Errant has just as high a cap as Jester.
Logged
All of my fan card mockups are credited to Violet CLM and his Dominion Card Image Generator.

GendoIkari

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8231
  • Respect: +8998
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4535 on: January 20, 2020, 08:16:46 pm »
0

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games

Not that much more than Jester, I don't think. That said, I think it's almost certainly too weak. Just + is too weak for (Legionary) and I think this is going to be weaker than that most of the time.

jester, only one person is getting a card at a time. this is tossing out 4+ copies each time its played.

Jester gives out one card per player who revealed a non-Victory card. Knight Errant has just as high a cap as Jester.

Victory cards too.
Logged
Check out my F.DS extension for Chrome! Card links; Dominion icons, and maybe more! http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=13363.0

Thread for Firefox version:
http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=16305.0

Something_Smart

  • Salvager
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 61
  • Respect: +62
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4536 on: January 20, 2020, 09:19:30 pm »
0

Think the vanilla bonus should be stronger? +1 Buy +$3, maybe, but I think that compares too favorably to Sacred Grove. (Since Sacred Grove gives +1 Buy +$3 and a bonus that's more likely to help others than to help you, whereas this would give the same but with a bonus more likely to help you.)
Logged

Fragasnap

  • Duke
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 377
  • Respect: +541
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4537 on: January 20, 2020, 09:22:53 pm »
0

Promenade (Action, $6).

You may play an Action card from your hand twice.
You may return one of your Villagers. If you did, play it a third time.
---
When you gain this, +1 Villager.

A Throne Room variant that lets you upgrade to King's Court if you have a Villager to hand.
...
That said, my main issue with Promenade isn't its power level, but that it's too Kingdom dependent. If the Kingdom has no other sources of Villagers, it's too weak IMO, but if the Kingdom has a way of getting large amounts of Villagers, such as Recruiter or Academy, then Promenade becomes practically just a cheap King's Court. It's always going to be broken in one direction or the other, IMO.
Couldn't say it better.

seeked (sook?)
"Sought."
What about if it, rather than going from hand for its target card, was like Rebuild, where it [sought] out the next Victory card in your deck and set it aside? It'd still be terminal. Maybe get rid of the penalty with that since it's going to be more randomized. Feel like that'd be less centralizing than Rebuild. Could be maybe a little swingy in slogs (player A sets aside an Overgrown Estate, player B sets aside a Colony - bad news bears for A) but it wouldn't slow the game down nearly as hard as trying to line up a collision which causes a price increase.

Revising it to
Quote
Vista $5 Action - Duration - Victory
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card. Set the revealed Victory card aside, face up, under this. If this sets aside a Province or Colony, all other players get +1 Card.
(This stays in play).
-
This is worth % equal to its set-aside card(s).
The hunting Island is definitely more interesting conceptually, but, as you cover, it would render many games far too luck-based, not even in the worst-case. Consider Estate versus Province for a 5VP swing that makes the player lose a $5-cost one-shot while, in a way, reducing the overall VP that is available in the game.  That's pretty miserable compared to Distant Lands.  I think it needs to be worked into something where hitting an Estate is actually a good thing.

Quote
Cavern - Treasure Shelter, $1
When you play this, discard 2 Shelters and a Victory card, revealing them. If you d, +1 Buy and double your $ if you haven't yet this turn.
Something more rewarding to build around. Fortune spread across 4 cards I'm hoping is safe on a Shelter? The Victory need is there to stop a $5/$2 opening becoming $5/$4. I could make it need an Action in play if 4 cards is too many.

Thanks for your feedback.
Assuming we are doubling $10 (not too unreasonable for a deck junked up with 3 Shelters and a Province), that turns the 4 cards into $2.5 each, so it's probably still on the weak side.  The +Buy will likely be the deciding factor on whether or not Cavern is worth pursuing, which is fine if that is your intent.

$8 Project
When you buy this, set aside an action card from your hand. Whenever you play a copy of that card from your hand, play it again.
I like the concept.  I also but don't imagine that there are many Kingdoms for which it is not irreparably broken.  $14 would possibly still be too low.

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games
Gaining an Action typically decimates its pile.
Jester gives out one card per player who revealed a non-Victory card. Knight Errant has just as high a cap as Jester.
The cap is higher as the player of Knight Errant is affected too: It is not N-1 cards gained, it is straight N cards.  Really though, this will be far more like an Attack that not.  Gaining a Smithy is good.  Gaining 4 Smithies is not so good. And I can think of plenty worse targets that will be commonly swung into since the player of Knight Errant chooses.  I think it will be pretty strong.  I will confirm though that this will speed up 4-player games to an unhealthy degree whenever relevant, which would make me loathe to use the card.
Logged
Dominion: Greed 1.0, my fan expansion with "in-games-using-this" cards

segura

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 453
  • Respect: +184
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4538 on: January 21, 2020, 09:54:03 am »
0

Quote
Knight Errant
$5 - Action
+$3. Each player (including you) reveals and discards the top 2 cards of their deck and gains a copy of a card they revealed costing from $3 to $6 that you choose.

This is gonna decimate piles in 4+ player games

Not that much more than Jester, I don't think. That said, I think it's almost certainly too weak. Just + is too weak for (Legionary) and I think this is going to be weaker than that most of the time.
This is hard to judge but my hunch is this is slightly weakish for a $5 but only slightly. The best case is nearly always that the opponents gain a Silver which can be borderline junking or, you choosing a card whose pile is empty! Then the card is situationally better than Jester.

I also think that a lot of terminal Golds are pretty good so a terminal Gold with only a mild bonus is not such a horrible design choice.
Logged

spineflu

  • Tactician
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • Shuffle iT Username: spineflu
  • +1 Coffers, +1 Respect
  • Respect: +205
    • View Profile
    • my instagram, where i paint things
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4539 on: January 21, 2020, 08:17:17 pm »
0

did a last minute revision to put a price cap and a bonus for the most-common bad effect (when it sets aside an Estate). Also specified what to do with the rest of the revealed cards since I guess I forgot that when I revised into a hunting island.

LibraryAdventurer

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
  • Shuffle iT Username: LibraryAdventurer
  • Respect: +979
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4540 on: January 21, 2020, 09:45:02 pm »
+1



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory - Duration
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside, face up, under this (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
(This stays in play)
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
Make sure your Province has a view!
Just took another look at this and wondered Why is this a duration? Why does it stay in play?

Otherwise, I like this version.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2020, 09:46:28 pm by LibraryAdventurer »
Logged

scolapasta

  • Conspirator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 219
  • Respect: +164
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4541 on: January 21, 2020, 09:47:24 pm »
+2

Dance Hall
Action - $2
+1 Villager per Villager you have
-
When you gain this, +1 Villager

Oh I forgot to post.


Villager Clicker
cost $2 -  Action
Double your Villager tokens.
---
When you gain this, +1 Villagers.

I think I'm seeing double!  8)
Logged
Feel free to join us at scolapasta's cards for discussion on any of my custom cards.

majiponi

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 547
  • Respect: +447
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4542 on: January 21, 2020, 10:15:29 pm »
0

Dance Hall
Action - $2
+1 Villager per Villager you have
-
When you gain this, +1 Villager

Oh I forgot to post.


Villager Clicker
cost $2 -  Action
Double your Villager tokens.
---
When you gain this, +1 Villagers.

I think I'm seeing double!  8)

Oh, I didn't notice. Ok, another.

Quote
Coffer Clicker
cost $4 - Action
If this is the first Coffer Clicker you played in this turn, double your Coffers.
---
When you gain this, +1 Coffers.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2020, 10:25:27 pm by majiponi »
Logged

Saul Goodman

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
  • Respect: +44
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4543 on: January 21, 2020, 11:13:36 pm »
0



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory - Duration
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside, face up, under this (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
(This stays in play)
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
Make sure your Province has a view!
Just took another look at this and wondered Why is this a duration? Why does it stay in play?

Otherwise, I like this version.

It's like a Victory Card trapper.  It stays in play to keep whatever it catches out of your deck.  If it catches a cheap one, it gives you another Vista and a VP tokens.  If it catches an expensive one, it gives you a huge payday.

I think it is a brilliant concept.
Logged

LibraryAdventurer

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1285
  • Shuffle iT Username: LibraryAdventurer
  • Respect: +979
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4544 on: January 21, 2020, 11:28:15 pm »
0



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory - Duration
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside, face up, under this (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
(This stays in play)
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
Make sure your Province has a view!
Just took another look at this and wondered Why is this a duration? Why does it stay in play?

Otherwise, I like this version.

It's like a Victory Card trapper.  It stays in play to keep whatever it catches out of your deck.  If it catches a cheap one, it gives you another Vista and a VP tokens.  If it catches an expensive one, it gives you a huge payday.

I think it is a brilliant concept.
I get what the card does. I just don't know why it stays in play instead of setting itself aside with the card under it.

Saul Goodman

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
  • Respect: +44
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4545 on: January 22, 2020, 03:45:20 am »
+1



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory - Duration
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside, face up, under this (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
(This stays in play)
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
Make sure your Province has a view!
Just took another look at this and wondered Why is this a duration? Why does it stay in play?

Otherwise, I like this version.

It's like a Victory Card trapper.  It stays in play to keep whatever it catches out of your deck.  If it catches a cheap one, it gives you another Vista and a VP tokens.  If it catches an expensive one, it gives you a huge payday.

I think it is a brilliant concept.
I get what the card does. I just don't know why it stays in play instead of setting itself aside with the card under it.

I see your point!  It is really just a forced Island that always hits a mark.  Maybe that's why it stays in play?  Does it keep searching for a mark if you have no other VC cards in your deck?

Another question:. what happens when it catches itself?  Seems like it would really, really suck.  Never have two in your deck at one time!

If the contest were Design A Card That Hates Itself, this would be a ringer!
Logged

spineflu

  • Tactician
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • Shuffle iT Username: spineflu
  • +1 Coffers, +1 Respect
  • Respect: +205
    • View Profile
    • my instagram, where i paint things
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4546 on: January 22, 2020, 08:17:02 am »
+1



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory - Duration
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside, face up, under this (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
(This stays in play)
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
Make sure your Province has a view!
Just took another look at this and wondered Why is this a duration? Why does it stay in play?

Otherwise, I like this version.

It's like a Victory Card trapper.  It stays in play to keep whatever it catches out of your deck.  If it catches a cheap one, it gives you another Vista and a VP tokens.  If it catches an expensive one, it gives you a huge payday.

I think it is a brilliant concept.
I get what the card does. I just don't know why it stays in play instead of setting itself aside with the card under it.

out-of-play zones (tavern mat, "set aside", the trash) generally aren't ordered or paired (well, except prince i guess?). in-play ones generally are paired at least (archive, gear, crypt - "this card is the target of this other card"). Additionally, the card originally continuously did something after it was played and now it doesnt - skeumorphism, i guess.
that said, i think the orange/green color scheme is very attractive compared to the light grey/green.

i guess its mostly so you can do dumb tricks with Bonfire or enable that vp grab from emporium.

no good reasons. I'll revise it.



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory
Set this aside. Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside with this, face up (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
« Last Edit: January 22, 2020, 09:11:00 am by spineflu »
Logged

Saul Goodman

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
  • Respect: +44
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4547 on: January 22, 2020, 11:50:13 am »
0



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory - Duration
Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside, face up, under this (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
(This stays in play)
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).
Make sure your Province has a view!
Just took another look at this and wondered Why is this a duration? Why does it stay in play?

Otherwise, I like this version.

It's like a Victory Card trapper.  It stays in play to keep whatever it catches out of your deck.  If it catches a cheap one, it gives you another Vista and a VP tokens.  If it catches an expensive one, it gives you a huge payday.

I think it is a brilliant concept.
I get what the card does. I just don't know why it stays in play instead of setting itself aside with the card under it.

out-of-play zones (tavern mat, "set aside", the trash) generally aren't ordered or paired (well, except prince i guess?). in-play ones generally are paired at least (archive, gear, crypt - "this card is the target of this other card"). Additionally, the card originally continuously did something after it was played and now it doesnt - skeumorphism, i guess.
that said, i think the orange/green color scheme is very attractive compared to the light grey/green.

i guess its mostly so you can do dumb tricks with Bonfire or enable that vp grab from emporium.

no good reasons. I'll revise it.



Quote
Vista $5 Action - Victory
Set this aside. Reveal cards from your deck until you reveal a Victory card costing up to $8^. Set it aside with this, face up (discard the rest of the revealed cards). If this sets aside an...
...Estate, gain a Vista
...Province, all other players get +1 Card
-
Worth % equal to the set-aside card(s).

Do you care if this hits another Vista?  Or other Action Victories or Treasure-Victories, etc?

I think it might be better and more usable in more kingdoms if you wrote it in such a way to only catch pure VCs.  Just my take!
Logged

spineflu

  • Tactician
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 410
  • Shuffle iT Username: spineflu
  • +1 Coffers, +1 Respect
  • Respect: +205
    • View Profile
    • my instagram, where i paint things
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4548 on: January 22, 2020, 11:55:56 am »
0

Do you care if this hits another Vista?  Or other Action Victories or Treasure-Victories, etc?

I think it might be better and more usable in more kingdoms if you wrote it in such a way to only catch pure VCs.  Just my take!

nah successful implementation is left as an exercise to the reader. it has kingdoms it is weak in and thats fine.

its kinda the same deal as rebuild in that respect, in that it sucks when rebuild hits your harem or nobles but also thats definitely on you - however this is also circumstantially better because you keep your pasture or Humble Castle or whatever, so you still get the VP at the end
« Last Edit: January 22, 2020, 12:06:27 pm by spineflu »
Logged

Saul Goodman

  • Navigator
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 73
  • Respect: +44
    • View Profile
Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« Reply #4549 on: January 22, 2020, 12:23:55 pm »
0

Do you care if this hits another Vista?  Or other Action Victories or Treasure-Victories, etc?

I think it might be better and more usable in more kingdoms if you wrote it in such a way to only catch pure VCs.  Just my take!

nah successful implementation is left as an exercise to the reader. it has kingdoms it is weak in and thats fine.

its kinda the same deal as rebuild in that respect, in that it sucks when rebuild hits your harem or nobles but also thats definitely on you - however this is also circumstantially better because you keep your pasture or Humble Castle or whatever, so you still get the VP at the end

Great points!  Makes sense.  I like the card and no doubt it would get a lot of play in most kingdoms.  Even in "bad" kingdoms I could see myself taking a flyer if I was behind in the late game.  Of if I could gain it mid-turn and hit a province I knew was in my discard.

This would synergize really well with Tournament.

It's a game-changer.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2020, 12:25:20 pm by Saul Goodman »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 180 181 [182] 183 184 ... 195  All
 

Page created in 0.116 seconds with 22 queries.