That's been your defense for almost everything this game. "But I wouldn't do that as scum!"
Well the accusations have been particularly ridiculous this game. I'm not sure how else to respond to conspiracy theories. The fact of the matter is that I don't plan out my every move and hope to achieve some incredible far-fetched things. That's an ashersky trait.
What we see instead is me getting frustrated with the game, and thus trying to shake things up. You know, get some people to participate some more. I wouldn't have much reason to do so as scum, since obviously that leads to lazy people who can't be bothered to scumhunt to go "oh faust is different let's lynch him because different always means scum herp derp".
Not to mention:
DatSwan kill suggests gkrieg and/or Galzria are scum.
wow, why?
- DatSwan pushed for gkrieg
- DatSwan/Galzria have a history of voting for each other
- Galzria did not die even though he claimed main character.
- Datswan being town doesn't make his reads good
- As all alignments. Town v Town, Scum v Town, and Scum v Scum. You're drawing a conclusion that has no relevance here.
- And you, sir, didn't die even though you claimed a protective role, which is far more suspicious as scum at least had the WIFOM in regards to killing me because I -could- be protected, whereas you almost certainly were not. But this line of argument is what I would expect from scum, so, yeah.
- yes but scum is more likley to kill off players that pose a threat to them. And then they bank on town not analyzing nightkills. This pattern is exhitibed in multiple past games.
- the conclusion obivously is that scum!you would want to eliminate someone who will probably eventually go after you
- if you put yourself in scum's shoes here, it should not at all be surprising that I am still alive.
I can't help but feel that you want to not understand me.