Further, if you look at what you've picked apart in them, it's essentially to question his VLA because he noted that he would probably be less active as town than scum - as he was VLA, that's an irrelevant defense from him (as you noted), and is also an irrelevant case from you (as I noted).
That is absolutely not what I said. I did not question his VLA, I pointed out that he tried to defend himself by being disingenuous about his VLA.
I think we're essentially seeing and saying the same thing on this. I get your argument regarding his saying "I'm more town because I've posted less" being an irrelevant defense because if he was VLA, that is in no way alignment indicative. As such, such a defense from him carriers no merit.
Your argument is that his use of that defense is scummy, when his defense should simply be "I was VLA. Your argument is that he shouldn't be trying to make us think this posting style is similar to town!Dylan, when this posting style should be most similar to VLA!Dylan, which is not alignment indicative.
I get all that. The way you posted definitely read like you were questioning the VLA. Not just to me, but to others. That said, there is some merit in what you're suggesting. I just think it leads to lynching somebody who was VLA - and what you get from that is a coin flip lynch, that's naturally weighted towards town, that produces the least amount of interactional information with which to work D2.
That said, I'll reevaluate your other points on him - if you're able to elaborate further, that would be helpful.