i mean you can do that with any post
I don't think it's the same, there is much more forethought with certain posts, hence much more information in them. Certainly you don't think a big reread-reads post holds the same amount of information value (for others to analyze) as say a random RVS one liner?
i don't see reason to believe either has a larger inherent information value, no
i do earnestly believe this, which should be clear from how this played out. once the game gets too much into politics, falling back on other people's reads, and stacking walls of rereads against each other, my reads start to suck.
i find that d3s & d4s tend to be really scripted/driven by wagon stuff & night actions, which is why bussing d2/3 is loads better than it has any right to be. as well, i think that pps's style (and that of other people who try to just mess up the game and throw things off) should be a lot more useful on any other day than d1 (though i do believe that the hammering thing just sucks either way; it fucks up wagons which is nice, but it also fucks up wagon analysis, because after the fact we all notice that we just lynched the, like, lynchbaitiest person on the forum d1)
i don't know what one can really do to scumhunt d3 onward after two town lynches - being transparent about reasoning is how to get read well but at the same time being concise is kind of necessary since everyone inevitably loses interest. i would say be willing to consider everybody, look at things in isolation and avoid confirmation bias but that probably wouldn't have gotten andrew lynched