I agree with mcmc on Dylan, except I don't think it's necessarily scummy, I see it as a sincere attempt to reread and scumhunt and just not knowing exactly what he should be looking for and confusing a consistent townread for buddying. And also more scum points for mcmc for immediately jumping on a new player's attempt to properly contribute.
As for mcmc's other post, it's really easy (and suspicious) to call the last two people on a wagon scummy, though I happen to agree about pps being scummy for how he quickhammered. You say I jumped from one wagon to another and that's what's scummy. It is? There were a lot of other people who switched wagons yesterday including you switching from ash but I'm not pointing to it calling it scummy because it's not (correct me if I'm remembering this wrong). I think you suddenly have a scum read on me because I'm voting for you and that's pretty much the extent of it.
In regards to your thoughts on dylan, yes you can chalk up some of his misguided cases to being a newbie but nothing I have seen from dylan in other games makes me think he is newbish player and doesn't know what he should be looking for. This is in contrast to idp who I do think might just feel awkward and not know when to post what. It is also in contrast to twm who simply wasn't making cases with his limited reads so I pushed him to do that. Again these are the theee players who were off wagon, have very low post counts, and aren't making great cases. I find all of them varying degrees of scummy, dylan the most so from his defenses and reactions to being called out.
As for my read on you it's more specific to how you moved and why. If you read I was suspicious of ash, then ash made a bit of a case on me, then I made a self admittedly omgussy countercase on ash, luckily many people weighed in robz/eevee/ww(i think)/twm and mentioned it really looked like town on town. I agreed and moved away from ash on to Joseph because he was making some very unhelpful posts at a time I thought it very scummy. Then robz/schadd/we all join me voting for Joseph and you say:
What's the case on Joseph?
I don't think there was ever an answer to this question, although I'm guessing the case is "too much joking around".
You also make another post stating you agree with pps day 1 is frustrating and that if town doesn't want to lynch me because I'm being active that's okay but whose to say I won't start lurking later and that lurkers might start contributing. So this is really doubling down on you don't want to vote for Joseph and you want to lynch me. But then Joseph makes a comment about him going to claim and eevee makes a case against Joseph that is pretty much the same as my case and the reason other are voting him. You say this:
Maybe someone should start claiming.
Unless I get 6 objections in the next 3 hours, I will claim
And here I thought we'd left this behind earlier D1...besides, you already claimed SK. Is there a reason you want to bring us back to RVS style posts?
I agree, I don't like this claim post at all. Eevee's assessment makes sense, though I'm not sure why he didn't want to commit to a vote after making his case. I'll do it for him.
vote: Joseph L-1
So your move to Joseph come a little out of no where compared to your reads before. It also looks like you knew Joseph was at l-2 when you voted because you correctly say l-1 but you think eevee hasn't voted when he did. You correct yourself moments later but it's still strange. It feels a bit like you really preferred getting the lynch to go to me but you werent getting anywhere so once joesph looked like eevee was going to vote you quickly voted so as not to be in hammer position.
Author
Topic: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Game over! Scum won!) (Read 158063 times)