Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 63  All

Author Topic: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Game over! Scum won!)  (Read 157961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #800 on: March 16, 2017, 01:59:12 pm »

You're still voting Dylan, right, McMc?  You seem to be working yourself up to Andrew being scum.
Logged

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #801 on: March 16, 2017, 02:03:53 pm »

Leaning scum on: Dylan, andrew, robz, twm, pps

Leaning town on: schadd, witherweaver, eevee, idptg
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #802 on: March 16, 2017, 02:04:48 pm »

You're still voting Dylan, right, McMc?  You seem to be working yourself up to Andrew being scum.
Still voting dylan, still think off wagon is a good place to find scum. Dylan has the bonus of semi-clearing robz if he flips scum.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #803 on: March 16, 2017, 02:08:30 pm »

what would be the benefit of claiming ub?

Scum can make sure to avoid killing him during the day where he can reverse the lynch and then get him at night?

Or maybe, in the absence of a counter claim, we can trust the reads and he can't be lynched but see point number 1.

So, net negative, really.

I missed that claiming was discussed a bit. So yea having just the ub isn't worth it but idk what people think about the restless spirit claiming if it exists and that prompting the ub to claim. Or we save all that for tomorrow since I'm comfortable with our lynch options.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #804 on: March 16, 2017, 02:40:56 pm »

Robz was viewing the thread but disappeared, Hopefully takin a break mid reread.

I thought town wasn't as likely to do online status watching? /sarc
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #805 on: March 16, 2017, 02:49:58 pm »

Robz was viewing the thread but disappeared, Hopefully takin a break mid reread.

I thought town wasn't as likely to do online status watching? /sarc
I know you said sarcasm but I've never said town is less likely to do online status waitching. You can confirm with robz I actually didn't know how to use it untill my recent return. I used it to coordinate my quickhammer with twm and then I used it in squid girl to generally track when town was on and coordinate a possible quickhammer in that game as well. I have been using it frequently in this game to track what people are doing.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

mcmcsalot

  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 338
  • Shuffle iT Username: mcmcsalot
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #806 on: March 16, 2017, 02:53:52 pm »

Robz was viewing the thread but disappeared, Hopefully takin a break mid reread.

I thought town wasn't as likely to do online status watching? /sarc

Though if your town it would be great to check who it was that said that earlier, and maybe make some conclusions based on actual game things instead of making a joke at me.
Logged
Wins: M19, M21, M23, M24, M26, M39, M91, M94, M102, M104, M107, M114, M115
Losses: M20, M22, M25, M27, M30, M31, M35, M38, M40, M42, M46, M60, M90, M93, M96, M98, M100, M101, M106, M111, M113
Winrate: 38.2%(13/34) 29.6%(8/27), 71.4%(5/7)

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #807 on: March 16, 2017, 03:23:57 pm »

I didn't actually mean to imply you were the one that said that. Just that it had been said. My sarcasm was directed at whoever said it.

And after looking it up:

My vote on Dylan (and it's reasons).

Why do you think town is more likely to do online status policing than scum?

I don't know if there is any precedent, but my intuition would be that scum would be more likely to be on the lookout for these kind of "mishaps" that could make someone suspicious than town.

Hey look. Eevee
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #808 on: March 16, 2017, 03:26:22 pm »

and he was replying to Andrew, who said watching online status was "Town all day."
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Dylan32

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 132
  • Shuffle iT Username: Dylan32
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #809 on: March 16, 2017, 03:27:01 pm »

Andrew, I'm curious what you think about that comment now that mcmc has also done that.
Logged
Forum Mafia Record - Wins: 14 - NM9, M97, RMM41, M99, M102, M104, M119, M126, RMM56, M133, M134, RMM58, RMM59, RMM61, RMM60; Losses 15 - RMM37, M89, M94, M95, M96, M100, RMM47 M109, M110, M120, M127, M129, M131, M132, M136; MVPs: 1 - NM9

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #810 on: March 16, 2017, 04:36:27 pm »

No wifi in the airbnb of first four days unfortunately, so very sporadic access for now. :/
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #811 on: March 16, 2017, 04:46:01 pm »

Wait eevee, so are you going to actually be gone for more than a week or something? And have a safe trip!
No, I'll try to get on whenever I can, daily I hope. And changing accommodations in three days, hopefully the next one will have a wifi.

Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #812 on: March 16, 2017, 04:48:26 pm »

You're still voting Dylan, right, McMc?  You seem to be working yourself up to Andrew being scum.
Still voting dylan, still think off wagon is a good place to find scum. Dylan has the bonus of semi-clearing robz if he flips scum.
Why is that? (dylan->robz)
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #813 on: March 16, 2017, 04:56:38 pm »

My point was rather to not give towncred for it, I don't necessarily think it's scummy. Depends on the person i guess, i just think scum is more eager to justify their votes with external because they know they are voting anti-town.

I don't think there are catch-all scumtells like that anyways.

Im warming up to an andrew lynch. There seems to be a huge contrast in his playstyle compared to yesterday, and he seems to be overreacting to things constantly. Hmm.
Logged

Witherweaver

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6476
  • Shuffle iT Username: Witherweaver
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #814 on: March 16, 2017, 04:57:57 pm »

Votes speak louder than hedges.
Logged

pingpongsam

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1760
  • Shuffle iT Username: pingpongsam
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #815 on: March 16, 2017, 05:07:31 pm »

Votes speak louder than hedges.

Agreed.

The time has come. Vote: Andrew
Logged
You are the brashest scum player on f.ds.

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #816 on: March 16, 2017, 05:08:35 pm »

vote: andrew
Logged

Eevee

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1010
  • Shuffle iT Username: Eevee
  • A wild Eevee appears!
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #817 on: March 16, 2017, 05:17:19 pm »

(L-2)
Logged

The_Wine_Merchant

  • Alchemist
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 39
  • Shuffle iT Username: TWM
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #818 on: March 16, 2017, 05:43:19 pm »

Andrew you are still voting for me as well. Do you really think I'm scum and I'm trying to force your mislynch or set up your mislynch while also making sure we focus off wagon and try to lynch lurkers dylan/idp/twm. You think me and eevee are partners and buddying eachother for no reason like dylan? What's the narrative that fits me doing all of this work and putting out narratives and different cases on most players in the game and actively giving reads and thoughts. You think I'm doing all that in a game where without prompting robz/twm/dylan/idp will post almost no content...you seem just pissed off im not assuming you are town.

I resent the comment that I wouldn't post without prompting. I was busy IRL, I started posting as soon as I could.

Likewise. But as much as it annoys me to say it I feel like this sort of high mindedness is more likely to come from town.
Logged
Wins: M91, M96, NM10, M98, M102, M105
Losses: M100, M103, M104, M109, M112

MVPs: M91, M96
Win percentage: 54.5 (6/11)

The_Wine_Merchant

  • Alchemist
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 39
  • Shuffle iT Username: TWM
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #819 on: March 16, 2017, 05:46:06 pm »

Votes speak louder than hedges.

Agreed.

The time has come. Vote: Andrew

was that the big reveal?
Logged
Wins: M91, M96, NM10, M98, M102, M105
Losses: M100, M103, M104, M109, M112

MVPs: M91, M96
Win percentage: 54.5 (6/11)

The_Wine_Merchant

  • Alchemist
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 39
  • Shuffle iT Username: TWM
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #820 on: March 16, 2017, 05:54:42 pm »

I am still voting for andrew and feel ok about staying there. I didn't necessarily find the whole L-1/L-2 thing to be suspicious, but I have not really liked the way he has responded to suspicion.
Logged
Wins: M91, M96, NM10, M98, M102, M105
Losses: M100, M103, M104, M109, M112

MVPs: M91, M96
Win percentage: 54.5 (6/11)

AndrewisFTTW

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1129
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #821 on: March 16, 2017, 06:31:30 pm »

Your right andrew I'm sorry I'll stop coming up with possible narratives for what people have done because it's a stretch. I'm sorry I don't know your alignment so everything I say is going to be a stretch. Doesn't mean it's not helpful to put it out there as a possible narrative.

Not everything you say is a stretch, but this whole me pretending I missed Eevee's vote in hopes that he hammers fr some reason is most definitely a stretch.

It's not pretending. You missed eevee's vote(fact), you were aware Joseph was at l-2 before you voted(fact), you expected eevee to vote for Joseph(fact you said I don't know why eevee didn't vote). SO ONE COULD CONCLUDE, that you wanted to get on the Joseph wagon before it's got brought up to l-1 and then you would have to hammer if you were going to vote.

ONE COULD ALSO CONCLUDE, that after not finding Joseph scummy his continued unhelpfulness and posts about claiming convinced you that maybe he was scum so you voted for him.

First of all why would you say one could conclude I wanted to get on Joseph's wagon before L-1 when I'm the one who knowingly put him to L-1? And just because I vote someone doesn't mean I have to be committed to hammering.

I wouldn't say his unhelpfulness and posts about claiming convinced me he was scum. I didn't have any scum reads besides you yesterday and it was clear we weren't going to lynch you so I figured "well Joseph is still acting like it's RVS, that's a little weird" and that was enough for me to vote him. Not enough to be lynched, in my opinion but enough to vote and provoke some discussion which was quickly stifled by pps.

I believe this is the height of my wagon. And right after this robz/ww/schadd/eevee vote for Joseph. This feel a ton like townies honestly not liking the wagon on me getting so close to lynch without another option and so the person I'm pushing makes sense to join. This is what evens our wagons out.

It is then with this vote that andrew finally changes his opinion and moves his vote away from me and onto Joseph, quickly followed by pps who hammers a few posts after having said he would agree to disagree about my alignment.

The real people who had strange inorganic movements here are andrew and pps. The issue is that Joseph was acting increasingly scummy so it's very possible that's the actual moments that town!andrew and town!pps had had enough.

Here is the bulk of what I say about robz/eevee/ww/schaad's votes. Obviously it's hard to create more of a narrative for robz because he hasn't posted anything, I think eevee's vote made sense, you agreed with his analysis of Joseph yourself and he was town reading me so his vote makes sense, schadd I am majorly town reading based on how he is playing the game, overall pro town, high post counts, present.

I guess I should at some point do a ww reread next but I am town reading him as well so there you go. I'm doing my best while getting called scummy for laying out possible narratives. luckily there are enough people(hopefully townies) that see what I'm doing as townie.

Here's what I get from this:

1) Robz, WW, and schadd's votes are all ok because they don't actually want to lynch me because they know I'm town.
mcmc quote: "This feel a ton like townies honestly not liking the wagon on me getting so close to lynch without another option and so the person I'm pushing makes sense to join"

2) Andrew and pps are scummy because they voted last.
mcmc quote: "The real people who had strange inorganic movements here are andrew and pps."

3) Eevee's vote makes sense because he has a town read on me.
mcmc quote: "I think eevee's vote made sense, you agreed with his analysis of Joseph yourself and he was town reading me so his vote makes sense"

4) I'm going to ignore WW because I have a town read on him.
mcmc quote: "I guess I should at some point do a ww reread next but I am town reading him as well so there you go."

I believe this is the height of my wagon. And right after this robz/ww/schadd/eevee vote for Joseph. This feel a ton like townies honestly not liking the wagon on me getting so close to lynch without another option and so the person I'm pushing makes sense to join. This is what evens our wagons out.

It is then with this vote that andrew finally changes his opinion and moves his vote away from me and onto Joseph, quickly followed by pps who hammers a few posts after having said he would agree to disagree about my alignment.

The real people who had strange inorganic movements here are andrew and pps. The issue is that Joseph was acting increasingly scummy so it's very possible that's the actual moments that town!andrew and town!pps had had enough.

Here is the bulk of what I say about robz/eevee/ww/schaad's votes. Obviously it's hard to create more of a narrative for robz because he hasn't posted anything, I think eevee's vote made sense, you agreed with his analysis of Joseph yourself and he was town reading me so his vote makes sense, schadd I am majorly town reading based on how he is playing the game, overall pro town, high post counts, present.

I guess I should at some point do a ww reread next but I am town reading him as well so there you go. I'm doing my best while getting called scummy for laying out possible narratives. luckily there are enough people(hopefully townies) that see what I'm doing as townie.

Here's what I get from this:

1) Robz, schadd, and WW's votes make sense because they have a town read on me.
mcmc quote: "I feel like I have solid town reads on robz/schadd/ww they have me pegged as town which is correct"

2) Eevee, Andrew, and pps all voted last so they're the most suspicious.
mcmc quote:  "I then have decent narratives for pps, eevee, and Andrew"

3) I am conf!town and pps and Andrew are scummy because they didn't tell people to not vote for ash and they were the last two people to vote for Joseph.
mcmc quote: "pps and Andrew were pushing for the lynch of an active townie [I think you mean yourself?], didn't overly discourage people from moving to ashersky, and finally left all prior reads and hammered townie!joseph."

4) Thou shalt not OMGUS vote.
mcmc quote: "I absolutely don't want to punish active town andrew and pps for having slightly different opinions than me"

5) Votes with no content (Robz/schadd/ww) are OK if you have a town read on me, but lurking with no explanation is not.
mcmc quote: "The lurking has been cleared up, twm and dylan and idp explained themselves"

And now this:

Yea I think the big bummer in this game is that after what was pretty much a complete reread of the days major wagons and how they formed, I feel like I have solid town reads on robz/schadd/ww they have me pegged as town which is correct, they pegged ash correctly as town, their votes for the dead townie Joseph all make sense. I then have decent narratives for pps, eevee, and Andrew which I could see going either way, town or scum and then I have TWM, idp, and dylan which are all so null due to how little they posted it's impossible to figure out which way to tilt the narratives for pps/andrew/eevee.

Oh so the last three people to vote on a mislynch are the scummiest. Cool, got it. Sarcasm aside though, I think pps's vote is scummy. It looks like he thought a quickhammer would gain him towncred which I'm not willing to grant him.

Quote
It's like pps/andrew/idp could very easily be the scum team. Idp is lurky off wagon, pps and Andrew were pushing for the lynch of an active townie, didn't overly discourage people from moving to ashersky, and finally left all prior reads and hammered townie!joseph. That's one narrative that makes good sense and I could see being true.

ash was a null read for me D1, why would you expect me to discourage people moving to him? That's misleading and is obviously an attempt to subtly encourage suspicion without committing to it heavily.

mcmc is still scum read #1 for me, but a lynch pool of the three people off wagon makes sense to me too.

Oh look andrew your response last time I talked about on wagon vs off wagon you also find the end of the wagon scummy and you also think looking off wagon is good. So you now saying that I singled you out is crap. Your playing super super reactively to whatever the last thing posted is which is super scummy.

Where do I say I find the end of the wagon scummy? Unless you're referring to my sarcasm when I said "Oh so the last three people to vote on a mislynch are the scummiest. Cool, got it." And yeah I thought looking off wagon was a good idea, when did I say it wasn't a good idea? And I don't think I ever said you singled me out, or at least I didn't mean to. I've always said you've only looked at the end of the wagon and not at the three votes with no substance behind them and now by reading through all of this I see it's because those three voters apparently had town reads on you, which makes them perfectly fine and not suspicious in your book.

As for my playstyle, well I don't know what to say there. I just post my thoughts, my suspicions, pose questions when I want to dig deeper, and defend myself when I feel I have to.

Andrew, I'm curious what you think about that comment now that mcmc has also done that.

When I said it was "town all day" I was referring to that specific post. But regardless what IDP (I think it was him) was doing was trying to use it for scumhunting. To me this just looks like mcmc telling everyone he hopes Robz comes back soon.
Logged
Wins: M39, M41, M48, M96, M97, M102, M105
Losses: M40, M43, M45, BM17 (?), RMM13, RMM17, RMM20, NM7, ZM18, M100, M109
MVPs: M97
Mod/Co-Mod: M46, M49, M52, NM10

AndrewisFTTW

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1129
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #822 on: March 16, 2017, 06:37:53 pm »

I am still voting for andrew and feel ok about staying there. I didn't necessarily find the whole L-1/L-2 thing to be suspicious, but I have not really liked the way he has responded to suspicion.

Yes I understand that I'm defensive and sarcastic and maybe a little impatient and rude, but I don't think there's anything inherently scummy about my playstyle, just like I don't cite WW's style of play today (somewhat lurking, posting sentences here and there, egging people on) as necessarily scummy. Maybe it's just me but I try to look at content and reads. I've never been good at reading metas so I usually try to avoid talking in those terms.
Logged
Wins: M39, M41, M48, M96, M97, M102, M105
Losses: M40, M43, M45, BM17 (?), RMM13, RMM17, RMM20, NM7, ZM18, M100, M109
MVPs: M97
Mod/Co-Mod: M46, M49, M52, NM10

AndrewisFTTW

  • Saboteur
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1129
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #823 on: March 16, 2017, 06:46:47 pm »

Another thing I think is not inherently scummy is changing reads. I think some people are scared to reverse their vote or honestly express what their reads are in light of new developments because other people will consistently jump on them for not committing to an original read. The fact is reads change and I don't think it's fair to just point to someone changing their vote and call it scummy by simply saying something like "this feels inorganic" or "he changed his vote out of nowhere". Obviously the onus is on the person changing their vote to explain how their read changed in the first place but as long as that's clear I don't think that is a legitimate reason by itself to call someone scummy.... unless you're scum.

Alright, I'm off my soapbox now.
Logged
Wins: M39, M41, M48, M96, M97, M102, M105
Losses: M40, M43, M45, BM17 (?), RMM13, RMM17, RMM20, NM7, ZM18, M100, M109
MVPs: M97
Mod/Co-Mod: M46, M49, M52, NM10

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 892
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
    • View Profile
Re: M96: Fibonacci Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #824 on: March 16, 2017, 06:54:35 pm »

pps, would you like to elaborate on why you are confident enough andrew is scum to not try to get the hammer?
Logged
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 [33] 34 35 ... 63  All
 

Page created in 0.059 seconds with 20 queries.