Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: empires  (Read 9622 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
  • Respect: +3680
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #25 on: June 18, 2016, 02:40:48 pm »
0

Is Expedition better or worse than Smithy?
Logged
DM me for ideas on a new article, either here or on Discord (I check Discord way more often)

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 892
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
  • Respect: +1266
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #26 on: June 18, 2016, 04:03:04 pm »
0

Is Expedition better or worse than Smithy?
worse
Logged
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'

eHalcyon

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8689
  • Respect: +9187
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #27 on: June 18, 2016, 04:21:58 pm »
+1

If you find it difficult to compare Events with cards because Events are one-time things, shouldn't it be similarly difficult to compare Embargo with other $2s, or IGG with other $5s?  Comparing overpay cards seems even worse to me, since you usually pay more than what you do for other cards at the same "cost".
Logged

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11815
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (´。• ω •。`)
  • Respect: +12868
    • View Profile
    • Birds of Necama
Re: empires
« Reply #28 on: June 18, 2016, 05:01:35 pm »
+1

Is Expedition better or worse than Smithy?

Yes.
Logged
Bomb, Cannon, and many of the Gunpowder cards can strongly effect gameplay, particularly in a destructive way

The YouTube channel where I make musicDownload my band's Creative Commons albums for free

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 892
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
  • Respect: +1266
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #29 on: June 18, 2016, 05:44:07 pm »
+1

here's another thing: you have an enchantress and a workshop in hand, but only one action. that is close to the same decision as expedition v smithy, and you make it all the time with no issue.
Logged
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'

werothegreat

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8172
  • Shuffle iT Username: werothegreat
  • Let me tell you a secret...
  • Respect: +9630
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #30 on: June 19, 2016, 12:23:30 pm »
+3

Expedition and Smithy don't have the same cost.  We've come full circle from the "Warehouse is strictly better than Cellar" discussion.
Logged
Contrary to popular belief, I do not run the wiki all on my own.  There are plenty of other people who are actively editing.  Go bother them!

Check out this fantasy epic adventure novel I wrote, the Broken Globe!  http://www.amazon.com/Broken-Globe-Tyr-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B00LR1SZAS/

Chris is me

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2745
  • Shuffle iT Username: Chris is me
  • What do you want me to say?
  • Respect: +3458
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #31 on: July 11, 2016, 11:24:12 am »
+2

yo schadd I know you said July 17th but what if instead of July 17th you started like today, since discussion about Empires on these forums is basically completely dead now
Logged
Twitch channel: http://www.twitch.tv/chrisisme2791

bug me on discord

pm me if you wanna do stuff for the blog

they/them

schadd

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 892
  • Shuffle iT Username: schadd
  • Respect: +1266
    • View Profile
Re: empires
« Reply #32 on: July 11, 2016, 06:09:51 pm »
+2

yo schadd I know you said July 17th but what if instead of July 17th you started like today, since discussion about Empires on these forums is basically completely dead now
ugh whatever fine
Logged
I thought you thought it was a slip because I said 'Jake's partners' instead of 'Roadrunner7671.'
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 20 queries.