Topic: Let's count ourselves! (Read 2297 times)

Accatitippi · « **on:** May 17, 2016, 06:58:03 pm »

Counting each other didn't exactly work out as intended, so let's try out the same concept on a more limited scope.
Count how many of yourself there are. That's the number of people between the chair(s) and the keyboard, or holding the smartphone, or looking out of your eyes.
You are free to post in this thread as many times as you wish, to follow the number of you over time. You may even want to draw a nice #you/time plot.

So, let me kickstart this:
1.

"Det som du er, vær fullt og helt, og ikke stykkevis og delt."
Henrik Ibsen

scott_pilgrim · « **Reply #1 on:** May 17, 2016, 07:01:04 pm »

But...there's only one of us total. We're all Wandering Winder.

Awaclus · « **Reply #2 on:** May 17, 2016, 07:29:11 pm »

Quote from: scott_pilgrim on May 17, 2016, 07:01:04 pm

But...there's only one of us total. We're all Wandering Winder.

According to some interpretations, there are two people here: Wandering Winder and sudgy (sudgy is the only sudgy and everyone else is Wandering Winder).

faust · « **Reply #3 on:** May 17, 2016, 07:39:20 pm »

liopoil · « **Reply #4 on:** May 17, 2016, 08:19:30 pm »

Seprix · « **Reply #5 on:** May 17, 2016, 08:38:49 pm »

schadd · « **Reply #6 on:** May 17, 2016, 08:46:04 pm »

iguanaiguana · « **Reply #7 on:** May 17, 2016, 08:46:40 pm »

Quote from: scott_pilgrim on May 17, 2016, 07:01:04 pm

But...there's only one of us total. We're all Wandering Winder.

But if we're all Wandering Winder, does that mean the forum is abandoned?

Roadrunner7671 · « **Reply #8 on:** May 17, 2016, 09:06:27 pm »

Just delete duplicate posts and modify them so that they all contain an accurate number.
6?

Axxle · « **Reply #9 on:** May 17, 2016, 09:14:03 pm »

Seprix · « **Reply #10 on:** May 17, 2016, 09:14:12 pm »

Quote from: schadd on May 17, 2016, 08:46:04 pm

.98

Approximately correct.

Axxle2 · « **Reply #11 on:** May 17, 2016, 09:14:29 pm »

Quote from: Axxle on May 17, 2016, 09:14:03 pm

1

2

wachsmuth · « **Reply #12 on:** May 17, 2016, 09:56:40 pm »

Σ_{k=1}^∞ 9/10...

liopoil · « **Reply #13 on:** May 17, 2016, 10:27:55 pm »

Quote from: wachsmuth on May 17, 2016, 09:56:40 pm

Σ_{k=1}^∞ 9/(10^k)

FTFY

scott_pilgrim · « **Reply #14 on:** May 17, 2016, 11:03:41 pm »

Quote from: liopoil on May 17, 2016, 10:27:55 pm

Quote from: wachsmuth on May 17, 2016, 09:56:40 pm
Σ_{k=1}^∞ 9/(10^k)
FTFY

What if wachsmuth actually meant that there are an infinite number of him?

pacovf · « **Reply #15 on:** May 17, 2016, 11:24:34 pm »

Davio · « **Reply #16 on:** May 18, 2016, 08:48:08 am »

Well let's see.

I am dad, husband, employee, friend and member of a soccer team so there's at least 5 of me.

Witherweaver · « **Reply #17 on:** August 16, 2016, 03:22:33 pm »

Quote from: liopoil on May 17, 2016, 10:27:55 pm

Quote from: wachsmuth on May 17, 2016, 09:56:40 pm
Σ_{k=1}^∞ 9/(10^k)
FTFY

+1

Oh, wait, it already was 1. So +0

Roadrunner7671 · « **Reply #18 on:** August 16, 2016, 03:23:19 pm »

QuickSync · « **Reply #19 on:** June 28, 2017, 11:27:31 pm »

Don't know if this is what the thread is getting at, but I am prolly 1/50,000,000 could be higher (meaning less chance).

Its not because I am that smart, tho that factors in a little tiny bit (meaning I am no dummy but I am not a genius. My IQ is prolly around 115). Its because of specific things IDK if I want to talk about.

Dominion Strategy Forum

News:

Author Topic: Let's count ourselves! (Read 2297 times)