Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 [All]

Author Topic: Hearthstone's tracker problem  (Read 3883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2697
  • Respect: +1456
    • View Profile
Hearthstone's tracker problem
« on: October 25, 2015, 07:51:40 pm »
0

I was reminded of this because of (yet again) discussions about Dominion VP counting.

In my opinion, Hearthstone has a much more unfair tracking situation than Dominion ever had. Hearthstone is playable on several platforms (Windows, Mac, iOS, Android) but the trackers can't exist on mobile and barely exist on Mac (last time I tried one, it didn't work for me). Blizzard has given the OK to trackers, so although you can't use them at in-person tournaments as far as I know, there's no reason not to use a tracker on ladder. Unless, of course, you can't because of the platform you play on.

I'm not arguing that Blizzard is doing anything wrong here. I assume (without evidence) that most competitive Hearthstone players play on Windows and they all have equal benefit from trackers. Having trackers available makes the experience better for those players. If you play casually on mobile, maybe you don't care if you're unfairly disadvantaged by lack of tracker. Anyway, it's not like Blizzard can realistically ban trackers given how cheaty the Hearthstone community can be (Personman has nothing on 'em), and it'd be a big UI headache to build a tracker into the official client, so that's never going to happen. Am I happy playing sans tracker? No, but I'm glad that Hearthstone is available cross-platform at all, so I can't complain overall.

I just think it's funny how drama sometimes erupts on f.ds over trackers that arguably give similar or less advantage than the Hearthstone trackers, are available on all desktop platforms (not the case in Hearthstone), tell the opponent that the tracker is being used (not the case in Hearthstone), offer tracking functionality to the opponent even if the opponent isn't running a tracker (not the case in Hearthstone), and either can be turned off by opponent request or advertise their presence in the game name or automatch settings (also not the case in Hearthstone).
« Last Edit: October 25, 2015, 07:55:12 pm by blueblimp »
Logged

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 707
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Not Doc Cod
  • Respect: +536
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2015, 09:05:52 pm »
0

The idea is that hearthstone devs are fine with pen and paper tracking (which is banned according to strict Dominion rules, but allowed in hearthstone; after all how would you enforce it?), and that trackers just make that easier. You could get out pen and paper for your mobile device!

I mostly use it for stat tracking anyway, at least in constructed. It is v. Useful in arena since you usually can't know your deck as well.
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (0-1, 0%): x - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - None.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2015, 10:23:28 pm »
0

I installed a tracker a couple days ago. If you get more value out of Hearthstone deck tracker than dominion full deck tracking in a wishing well game, please teach me your ways.  I'm having trouble getting much value out of the extra information.  I plan to primarily use it to figure out whether I have 9 or 10 cards in hand as handlock, which is totally something that should be handled by the client itself.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2697
  • Respect: +1456
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2015, 12:02:45 am »
0

I installed a tracker a couple days ago. If you get more value out of Hearthstone deck tracker than dominion full deck tracking in a wishing well game, please teach me your ways.  I'm having trouble getting much value out of the extra information.  I plan to primarily use it to figure out whether I have 9 or 10 cards in hand as handlock, which is totally something that should be handled by the client itself.
I can't speak from actually having used one, but there have been times in Control Warriors mirrors where I really wanted to know how many Shield Slams and Executes had been used on both sides, and couldn't remember for sure.

But more generally, in any situation where you're playing to your outs, knowing exactly what those outs are is pretty helpful. I don't think deck tracking alone is that amazing for Wishing Well (vs if you had draw deck vs discard tracking, which would be nuts), because it's not that hard to guess what the most common card in your deck is, given that it's usually copper and eventually becomes either well or maybe some village, and even if you pick wrong it's a pretty small % that it matters. I remember the greatest use for deck trackers being in Ambassador games because you badly want to know how your copper and estate counts are doing, in particular.
Logged

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1915
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2288
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2015, 04:19:46 am »
0

I installed a tracker a couple days ago. If you get more value out of Hearthstone deck tracker than dominion full deck tracking in a wishing well game, please teach me your ways.  I'm having trouble getting much value out of the extra information.  I plan to primarily use it to figure out whether I have 9 or 10 cards in hand as handlock, which is totally something that should be handled by the client itself.

Is the mana cost of the leftmost card in your hand below the edge of the board?  Then you have 10 cards in hand; if not, you don't.
Logged

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2015, 09:15:29 am »
+1

I installed a tracker a couple days ago. If you get more value out of Hearthstone deck tracker than dominion full deck tracking in a wishing well game, please teach me your ways.  I'm having trouble getting much value out of the extra information.  I plan to primarily use it to figure out whether I have 9 or 10 cards in hand as handlock, which is totally something that should be handled by the client itself.
I can't speak from actually having used one, but there have been times in Control Warriors mirrors where I really wanted to know how many Shield Slams and Executes had been used on both sides, and couldn't remember for sure.

But more generally, in any situation where you're playing to your outs, knowing exactly what those outs are is pretty helpful. I don't think deck tracking alone is that amazing for Wishing Well (vs if you had draw deck vs discard tracking, which would be nuts), because it's not that hard to guess what the most common card in your deck is, given that it's usually copper and eventually becomes either well or maybe some village, and even if you pick wrong it's a pretty small % that it matters. I remember the greatest use for deck trackers being in Ambassador games because you badly want to know how your copper and estate counts are doing, in particular.

I meant draw deck vs discard tracking.  Which I guess no one has ever implemented, but it is derived information, so you could. 

The shield slams and executes thing makes sense, I guess, but it seems like an extreme case.  Control Warrior hasn't been a tier 1 deck anyway until maybe now as a consequence of the patron nerf (Demonlock handlock was doing its niche better before the nerf with facehunter horrified out of existence).  Most decks are way more braindead than control warrior, and as a result they reward deck tracking less.  You don't need to count fireballs, the game will be over when you count to two turn 8 against Mechmage.  Don't need to count force roars.  Secradin is all about questions and not about answers (pun intended), so it doesn't matter if you remember whether they're out of Shredders or whatever.  Aldor Peacekeeper and Consecration are sort of answers, but the uncertainty of how many they are running can get mixed it with the uncertainty of how many you remember seeing them play so it all comes out in the wash.

I mean.  I really wish decktracking or decisionmaking had much impact on Hearthstone in general.  I've been pretty dissatisfied with it lately.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

chairs

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
  • Why don't you have a seat over there...
  • Respect: +16
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2015, 01:53:22 pm »
0

The only tracker I'm familiar with is HearthArena's "tracker" that shows the cards left in your deck, but doesn't track what your opponent played (since the 2-of rule doesn't exist in Arena).

Are there other trackers I should be considering?

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1915
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2288
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2015, 02:13:05 pm »
0

The uncontroversial and lightweight one is Track-o-Bot which records your results so that you can see your win/loss record for each match-up.  It also records which cards have been played so you can work out the deck archetypes later.  This is very like an automated Heartharena for laddering.

There are also much more complete trackers that overlay tracked information on the game screen.  You can see a list of cards played by each side, as well as which cards in your opponent's hand were drawn on which turn: nothing that you couldn't work out yourself in principle, although in practice I think few people do.  I have not used one of these, but could be tempted to give one a go.  Does anybody have any recommendations?
Logged

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 707
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Not Doc Cod
  • Respect: +536
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2015, 06:46:07 am »
+1

The uncontroversial and lightweight one is Track-o-Bot which records your results so that you can see your win/loss record for each match-up.  It also records which cards have been played so you can work out the deck archetypes later.  This is very like an automated Heartharena for laddering.

There are also much more complete trackers that overlay tracked information on the game screen.  You can see a list of cards played by each side, as well as which cards in your opponent's hand were drawn on which turn: nothing that you couldn't work out yourself in principle, although in practice I think few people do.  I have not used one of these, but could be tempted to give one a go.  Does anybody have any recommendations?
Hearthstone Deck Tracker (original name, I know) is really pretty good.  If you're in the habit of keeping track of yours and your opponent's standard removal spells, you'll probably find it makes very little difference in constructed. (The other thing is remembering whether the coin has been used, which is really something the Hearthstone client should deal with; the Coin should never have been a card, it should be physical somehow, like an item resting on the board or something.  I don't know why I think that, I just do.)

But it's super useful in arena.

https://github.com/Epix37/Hearthstone-Deck-Tracker
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (0-1, 0%): x - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - None.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2015, 09:38:24 am »
0

The uncontroversial and lightweight one is Track-o-Bot which records your results so that you can see your win/loss record for each match-up.  It also records which cards have been played so you can work out the deck archetypes later.  This is very like an automated Heartharena for laddering.

There are also much more complete trackers that overlay tracked information on the game screen.  You can see a list of cards played by each side, as well as which cards in your opponent's hand were drawn on which turn: nothing that you couldn't work out yourself in principle, although in practice I think few people do.  I have not used one of these, but could be tempted to give one a go.  Does anybody have any recommendations?
Hearthstone Deck Tracker (original name, I know) is really pretty good.  If you're in the habit of keeping track of yours and your opponent's standard removal spells, you'll probably find it makes very little difference in constructed. (The other thing is remembering whether the coin has been used, which is really something the Hearthstone client should deal with; the Coin should never have been a card, it should be physical somehow, like an item resting on the board or something.  I don't know why I think that, I just do.)

But it's super useful in arena.

https://github.com/Epix37/Hearthstone-Deck-Tracker
Mana Wyrm was inoffensive when the Coin first game out, but turn three Flame Waker coin Arcane Missiles is making people rethink it
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

ycz6

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 669
  • Respect: +373
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2015, 01:27:17 pm »
0

The uncontroversial and lightweight one is Track-o-Bot which records your results so that you can see your win/loss record for each match-up.  It also records which cards have been played so you can work out the deck archetypes later.  This is very like an automated Heartharena for laddering.

There are also much more complete trackers that overlay tracked information on the game screen.  You can see a list of cards played by each side, as well as which cards in your opponent's hand were drawn on which turn: nothing that you couldn't work out yourself in principle, although in practice I think few people do.  I have not used one of these, but could be tempted to give one a go.  Does anybody have any recommendations?
Hearthstone Deck Tracker (original name, I know) is really pretty good.  If you're in the habit of keeping track of yours and your opponent's standard removal spells, you'll probably find it makes very little difference in constructed. (The other thing is remembering whether the coin has been used, which is really something the Hearthstone client should deal with; the Coin should never have been a card, it should be physical somehow, like an item resting on the board or something.  I don't know why I think that, I just do.)

But it's super useful in arena.

https://github.com/Epix37/Hearthstone-Deck-Tracker
Mana Wyrm was inoffensive when the Coin first game out, but turn three Flame Waker coin Arcane Missiles is making people rethink it
...what?
Logged

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9546
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (。 ω 。`)
  • Respect: +9308
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2015, 01:40:55 pm »
+1

the Coin should never have been a card, it should be physical somehow, like an item resting on the board or something.
Mana Wyrm was inoffensive when the Coin first game out, but turn three Flame Waker coin Arcane Missiles is making people rethink it
...what?

Does it make more sense now?

chairs

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
  • Why don't you have a seat over there...
  • Respect: +16
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #12 on: October 27, 2015, 01:56:39 pm »
0

When Mana Wyrm was introduced, the fact that the Coin is a -1 cost spell was relatively negligible.

However, the Coin as a -1 cost spell means that the interaction with Flame Waker and Arcane Missiles on turn 3 is pretty oppressive (5 1-damage random shots in a single turn, doable on Turn 3).

markusin

  • Cartographer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3122
  • Shuffle iT Username: markusin
  • I also switched from Starcraft
  • Respect: +1676
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2015, 02:28:49 pm »
0

When Mana Wyrm was introduced, the fact that the Coin is a -1 cost spell was relatively negligible.

However, the Coin as a -1 cost spell means that the interaction with Flame Waker and Arcane Missiles on turn 3 is pretty oppressive (5 1-damage random shots in a single turn, doable on Turn 3).

It's 7 1-damage random shots because Flameaker procs off Arcane Missiles and the Coin. Plus any Mana Wyrms gain +2 attack.
Logged

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2015, 02:29:41 pm »
0

When Mana Wyrm was introduced, the fact that the Coin is a -1 cost spell was relatively negligible.

However, the Coin as a -1 cost spell means that the interaction with Flame Waker and Arcane Missiles on turn 3 is pretty oppressive (5 1-damage random shots in a single turn, doable on Turn 3).
It's 7.  So OP, your brain wants to miscount it.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #15 on: October 27, 2015, 02:30:36 pm »
+1

Thanks for the correction Awaclus.  Although I heard you are famous for unhelpfulness so I can't help but be concerned that your account is compromised.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

chairs

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
  • Why don't you have a seat over there...
  • Respect: +16
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #16 on: October 27, 2015, 02:36:50 pm »
0

When Mana Wyrm was introduced, the fact that the Coin is a -1 cost spell was relatively negligible.

However, the Coin as a -1 cost spell means that the interaction with Flame Waker and Arcane Missiles on turn 3 is pretty oppressive (5 1-damage random shots in a single turn, doable on Turn 3).
It's 7.  So OP, your brain wants to miscount it.

For some reason I thought flamewaker was only 1 shot per spell, not 2. My mistake.

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9546
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (。 ω 。`)
  • Respect: +9308
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #17 on: October 27, 2015, 02:46:58 pm »
0

Thanks for the correction Awaclus.  Although I heard you are famous for unhelpfulness so I can't help but be concerned that your account is compromised.

I believe my reputation of being "unhelpful" comes from mafia games, where I believe it is good play to not explain the reasons why I'm voting for the people I'm voting.

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #18 on: October 27, 2015, 02:49:10 pm »
0

Thanks for the correction Awaclus.  Although I heard you are famous for unhelpfulness so I can't help but be concerned that your account is compromised.

I believe my reputation of being "unhelpful" comes from mafia games, where I believe it is good play to not explain the reasons why I'm voting for the people I'm voting.
That sounds like something someone who stole your account would say.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

chairs

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
  • Why don't you have a seat over there...
  • Respect: +16
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #19 on: October 27, 2015, 03:30:22 pm »
0

Thanks for the correction Awaclus.  Although I heard you are famous for unhelpfulness so I can't help but be concerned that your account is compromised.

I believe my reputation of being "unhelpful" comes from mafia games, where I believe it is good play to not explain the reasons why I'm voting for the people I'm voting.

And where everyone else believes D1 Awaclus lynches might be the best policy in Mafia because of it? ;)

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9546
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (。 ω 。`)
  • Respect: +9308
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #20 on: October 27, 2015, 03:51:01 pm »
0

And where everyone else believes D1 Awaclus lynches might be the best policy in Mafia because of it? ;)

Nobody believes that.

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2697
  • Respect: +1456
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #21 on: October 27, 2015, 06:16:54 pm »
0

Mana Wyrm Coin Mirror Image has always been pretty nasty, from well before release. Or for P1, Mana Wyrm into turn 2 Frostbolt. In one of my first ranked games, my opponent played Mana Wyrm and I thought it was pretty OP. (I would have mostly had basic cards at the time!)
Logged

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #22 on: October 28, 2015, 12:23:16 am »
0

Mana Wyrm Coin Mirror Image has always been pretty nasty, from well before release. Or for P1, Mana Wyrm into turn 2 Frostbolt. In one of my first ranked games, my opponent played Mana Wyrm and I thought it was pretty OP. (I would have mostly had basic cards at the time!)

I think everyone knows Mana Wyrm is OP.  We were talking about coin.  But since listed a P1 opening for Mana Wyrm that is almost as good as the P2 opening for Mana Wyrm (if not better) it seems like you're on our page about it.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 707
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Not Doc Cod
  • Respect: +536
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #23 on: November 11, 2015, 09:25:48 am »
0

Necro a bit here, but I'd forgotten to mention the other thing about the coin being a spell, which was freaking ROGUES, man!  Not really an issue now (maybe somewhat in arena still), but it helps the combo trigger a lot, and was often crazy good in the classic Miracle Rogue nonsense. 

(Nowadays I think it's hilarious how quickly Gadgetzan was nerfed, Gadgetzan Miracle Rogue was not nearly as crazy as, say, Patron from what I remember - then again I didn't have cards back then and never climbed far up the ladder.)
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (0-1, 0%): x - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - None.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9546
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (。 ω 。`)
  • Respect: +9308
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #24 on: November 11, 2015, 12:40:06 pm »
0

I also don't like that Coin triggers opponent's Troggs, Counterspell, gets screwed by Loatheb, counts as a card in your hand for the 10-card limit and stuff like Divine Favor and Twilight Drake, etc.

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #25 on: November 11, 2015, 06:15:12 pm »
+1

This thread got necro'ed and it wasn't about Reno Jackson?  The value of a Hearthstone Tracker doubles on thursday if he doesn't get a yellow outline when he's live.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9546
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (。 ω 。`)
  • Respect: +9308
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #26 on: November 11, 2015, 06:21:02 pm »
+1

This thread got necro'ed and it wasn't about Reno Jackson?  The value of a Hearthstone Tracker doubles on thursday if he doesn't get a yellow outline when he's live.

It's f.ds, of course a thread about Hearthstone trackers is going to get necroed about how The Coin shouldn't be a spell.

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2697
  • Respect: +1456
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #27 on: November 12, 2015, 01:31:19 am »
0

This thread got necro'ed and it wasn't about Reno Jackson?  The value of a Hearthstone Tracker doubles on thursday if he doesn't get a yellow outline when he's live.
Yes. I hope they have the sense to recognize how important the visual indicator is on this card.
Logged

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2312
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
  • Respect: +1492
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #28 on: November 12, 2015, 07:41:48 am »
0

This thread got necro'ed and it wasn't about Reno Jackson?  The value of a Hearthstone Tracker doubles on thursday if he doesn't get a yellow outline when he's live.
Yes. I hope they have the sense to recognize how important the visual indicator is on this card.

Didn't they already announce that they were specifically NOT going to indicate it?
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year

Games (30): Mafia: 17, 21, 24, 31, 39, 43, 67, 72, 86 || Newbie: 7 || RMM: 6, 7, 10, 20, 22, 26, 32, 45 || Blitz: 4-7, X, 17-19, 22, 24 || BM: 14, 19

2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

Town: 46 Games, 23 Wins
Scum: 21 Games, 12 Wins
10x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, M51

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 707
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Not Doc Cod
  • Respect: +536
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #29 on: November 12, 2015, 07:50:29 am »
0

Didn't they already announce that they were specifically NOT going to indicate it?
If that's true, they're completely insane.  Surely they realise that anyone running a real Reno Jackson deck is going to be tracking their deck anyway?  Either with a tracker or just with pen and paper.  I mean seriously.
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (0-1, 0%): x - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - None.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

ashersky

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2312
  • 2013/2014/2015 Mafia Mod of the Year
  • Respect: +1492
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2015, 08:03:56 am »
0

Didn't they already announce that they were specifically NOT going to indicate it?
If that's true, they're completely insane.  Surely they realise that anyone running a real Reno Jackson deck is going to be tracking their deck anyway?  Either with a tracker or just with pen and paper.  I mean seriously.

Liquidhearth's Wing One preview states it, but no source provided: http://www.liquidhearth.com/forum/hearthstone/498238-league-of-explorers-card-review-wing-one
Logged
f.ds Mafia Board Moderator

2013, 2014, 2015 Mafia Mod of the Year

Games (30): Mafia: 17, 21, 24, 31, 39, 43, 67, 72, 86 || Newbie: 7 || RMM: 6, 7, 10, 20, 22, 26, 32, 45 || Blitz: 4-7, X, 17-19, 22, 24 || BM: 14, 19

2015 f.ds Representative, World Forum Mafia Championships
2013, 2014 Mafia Player of the Year (Tie)

Town: 46 Games, 23 Wins
Scum: 21 Games, 12 Wins
10x MVP: M30, M83, ZM16, M25, M38, M61, M76, RMM5, RMM41, M51

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #31 on: November 12, 2015, 12:50:55 pm »
0

Didn't they already announce that they were specifically NOT going to indicate it?
If that's true, they're completely insane.  Surely they realise that anyone running a real Reno Jackson deck is going to be tracking their deck anyway?  Either with a tracker or just with pen and paper.  I mean seriously.

Liquidhearth's Wing One preview states it, but no source provided: http://www.liquidhearth.com/forum/hearthstone/498238-league-of-explorers-card-review-wing-one
Pretty sure the source here is Ben Brode's response to a question about Reno at Blizzcon.  The question was something like "Hey Ben, so this new card Reno Jackson heals your hero if there is no more than 1 copy of each card in your deck.  I was wondering if there will be a feature like Hearthstone tracker to help us with it?" and his response was something like, "Well, we're definitely not going to do an entire tracker.  We might talk with development about what some of our options are for a more simple supplement that helps with cards like Reno.  But there definitely isn't anything like that being released as League of Explorers comes out."

I think it's a misinterpretation to assume there will be no yellow outline based on this response, since Ben Brode might have been strictly answering the question, will we get a full tracker/ will we get a similar complex feature like little dots on Reno in your hand, one dot for each duplicate card still clogging up your deck.  The binary simplistic yellow or not is not what the question was about, so much, it was using the increasing complexity of the card design to try to petition for some more tracking features really.  There might be a yellow outline and Ben Brode doesn't even know about it.

Blizz definitely isn't making a conscious design choice to withhold yellow outline.  If they forgot it, or are putting it off because the coding is more complicated than Tinkertown Technician, people will whine and we will surely get it, really. 

Even with the yellow outline, a tracker is a little more useful if you aren't good at tracking your deck on your own.  If there's only 1 dupe left in your deck, hold onto reno and try to heal, if there are 2 dupes left in your deck, fuhgeddaboutit better start hammering their shredders with Spectral Smith to try to stay alive.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2015, 02:28:27 am »
0

No yellow outline.  Get to trackin
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1163
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #33 on: November 13, 2015, 12:38:28 pm »
0

No yellow outline.  Get to trackin

Yup.
I just started using tracker for this reason only.
Logged

pingpongsam

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1677
  • Shuffle iT Username: pingpongsam
  • Respect: +745
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #34 on: November 13, 2015, 12:52:07 pm »
0

If they forgot it, or are putting it off because the coding is more complicated...

No, just no. The card already has to track your deck to determine if the battlecry applies or not. Therefore a yellow board is nothing more than a visual indicator or a calculation that has already been programmed.
Logged
You are the brashest scum player on f.ds.

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 707
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Not Doc Cod
  • Respect: +536
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #35 on: November 13, 2015, 01:05:46 pm »
0

If they forgot it,

No, just no. The card already has to track your deck to determine if the battlecry applies or not. Therefore a yellow board is nothing more than a visual indicator or a calculation that has already been programmed.
Does that help? This is more likely than any kind of coding issue.
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (0-1, 0%): x - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - None.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

ycz6

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 669
  • Respect: +373
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #36 on: November 15, 2015, 03:20:51 pm »
0

If they forgot it, or are putting it off because the coding is more complicated...

No, just no. The card already has to track your deck to determine if the battlecry applies or not. Therefore a yellow board is nothing more than a visual indicator or a calculation that has already been programmed.
Eh, I wouldn't assume this is the case at all. Whatever part of the code controls colored borders may not have access to the contents of your deck.
Logged

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1915
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2288
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #37 on: November 15, 2015, 03:33:14 pm »
0

Apparently the problem is that the Reno check is more computationally intensive than that for most other cards, and as everything is done server side they can't be sure it wouldn't cause load issues.
Logged

blueblimp

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2697
  • Respect: +1456
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #38 on: November 15, 2015, 04:08:12 pm »
+1

Apparently the problem is that the Reno check is more computationally intensive than that for most other cards, and as everything is done server side they can't be sure it wouldn't cause load issues.
Yes, somebody associated with Hearthsim did a post on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/3sv3v8/making_reno_jackson_highlighted_is_much_harder/cx0ord5.

My own intuition, although I don't know anything about Hearthstone's server code, is that checking for duplicates is a little trickier algorithmically than simply checking for a minion that satisfies a certain condition (like BGH does). It's possible to do fast, but they may want to be careful and make sure they have a robust solution before making it live, which seems reasonable.

In the meantime though, no Reno for me. :(
Logged

popsofctown

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4996
  • Respect: +2520
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #39 on: November 15, 2015, 04:30:40 pm »
+1

He's one of the more anti hearthstone cards they've ever made.  Taking a meticulous count of what's in your deck is not a casual way to play.  I think they wanted "Include Reno Jackson only if your decklist has no more than 1 copy of each card", but then this wording was "simpler", but then mechanically is far more intricate/fiddly/complex.

They are so bent on keeping things simple they're making it complicated.  And then naturally the features for a complicated game aren't there.
Logged
Also you probably are an expert if you buy two bureaucrats early.

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1915
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2288
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #40 on: November 15, 2015, 04:56:11 pm »
+1

If you want to play Reno casually you can always just run 30 1-ofs.  That might even be the best way to do it if you want to be super competitive.  Perhaps something like Freeze Mage would want Reno and duplicates, but if you want casual and easy to play you don't choose Freeze Mage.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2015, 05:56:05 am by qmech »
Logged

pingpongsam

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1677
  • Shuffle iT Username: pingpongsam
  • Respect: +745
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #41 on: November 15, 2015, 04:56:30 pm »
0

If they forgot it, or are putting it off because the coding is more complicated...

No, just no. The card already has to track your deck to determine if the battlecry applies or not. Therefore a yellow board is nothing more than a visual indicator or a calculation that has already been programmed.
Eh, I wouldn't assume this is the case at all. Whatever part of the code controls colored borders may not have access to the contents of your deck.

Thinking about it, the check would have to be run on several deck changing events since deck contents are not a static thing that linearly decrements. Reno's battlecry likely procs on playing the minion. Hidden Torch is just one example of a card that could place a duplicate into the deck; I assume there are several others?
Logged
You are the brashest scum player on f.ds.

chairs

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 134
  • Why don't you have a seat over there...
  • Respect: +16
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #42 on: November 15, 2015, 05:23:43 pm »
0

Gang up

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1915
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2288
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #43 on: November 15, 2015, 05:24:23 pm »
0

If they forgot it, or are putting it off because the coding is more complicated...

No, just no. The card already has to track your deck to determine if the battlecry applies or not. Therefore a yellow board is nothing more than a visual indicator or a calculation that has already been programmed.
Eh, I wouldn't assume this is the case at all. Whatever part of the code controls colored borders may not have access to the contents of your deck.

Thinking about it, the check would have to be run on several deck changing events since deck contents are not a static thing that linearly decrements. Reno's battlecry likely procs on playing the minion. Hidden Torch is just one example of a card that could place a duplicate into the deck; I assume there are several others?

Entomb, Beneath the Grounds, Gang Up, Ambush, Recycle, Malorne ...
Logged

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1163
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #44 on: November 17, 2015, 08:53:23 am »
0

Apparently the problem is that the Reno check is more computationally intensive than that for most other cards, and as everything is done server side they can't be sure it wouldn't cause load issues.
Yes, somebody associated with Hearthsim did a post on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/3sv3v8/making_reno_jackson_highlighted_is_much_harder/cx0ord5.

My own intuition, although I don't know anything about Hearthstone's server code, is that checking for duplicates is a little trickier algorithmically than simply checking for a minion that satisfies a certain condition (like BGH does). It's possible to do fast, but they may want to be careful and make sure they have a robust solution before making it live, which seems reasonable.

In the meantime though, no Reno for me. :(

Difference is that you can calculate BGH on client and you need to call server to calculate Reno (cuz they don't store deck content locally).
Logged

qmech

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1915
  • Shuffle iT Username: qmech
  • What year is it?
  • Respect: +2288
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #45 on: November 17, 2015, 03:18:26 pm »
+1

Apparently the problem is that the Reno check is more computationally intensive than that for most other cards, and as everything is done server side they can't be sure it wouldn't cause load issues.
Yes, somebody associated with Hearthsim did a post on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/3sv3v8/making_reno_jackson_highlighted_is_much_harder/cx0ord5.

My own intuition, although I don't know anything about Hearthstone's server code, is that checking for duplicates is a little trickier algorithmically than simply checking for a minion that satisfies a certain condition (like BGH does). It's possible to do fast, but they may want to be careful and make sure they have a robust solution before making it live, which seems reasonable.

In the meantime though, no Reno for me. :(

Difference is that you can calculate BGH on client and you need to call server to calculate Reno (cuz they don't store deck content locally).

They could, but they don't.  The Hearthstone client does absolutely nothing gameplay-wise other than taking input and displaying the results.
Logged

Grujah

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2237
  • Respect: +1163
    • View Profile
Re: Hearthstone's tracker problem
« Reply #46 on: November 22, 2015, 08:18:20 pm »
0

Apparently the problem is that the Reno check is more computationally intensive than that for most other cards, and as everything is done server side they can't be sure it wouldn't cause load issues.
Yes, somebody associated with Hearthsim did a post on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/3sv3v8/making_reno_jackson_highlighted_is_much_harder/cx0ord5.

My own intuition, although I don't know anything about Hearthstone's server code, is that checking for duplicates is a little trickier algorithmically than simply checking for a minion that satisfies a certain condition (like BGH does). It's possible to do fast, but they may want to be careful and make sure they have a robust solution before making it live, which seems reasonable.

In the meantime though, no Reno for me. :(

Difference is that you can calculate BGH on client and you need to call server to calculate Reno (cuz they don't store deck content locally).

They could, but they don't.  The Hearthstone client does absolutely nothing gameplay-wise other than taking input and displaying the results.

That's the best way to do it, imho. You want server to do all the game stuff and client just to show things.
Storing deck content locally could lead to people hacking the game to get that content, for example.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [All]
 

Page created in 0.168 seconds with 20 queries.