Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: Victory by Develop?!?  (Read 8880 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WanderingWinder

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5275
  • ...doesn't really matter to me
  • Respect: +4386
    • View Profile
    • WanderingWinder YouTube Page
Re: Victory by Develop?!?
« Reply #25 on: January 10, 2012, 06:18:54 pm »
0

I wish I could give specific rules. I just get it when there's lots of 3s and 4s I want and it won't bring me too many terminals. Take a look at this interesting game from earlier today:

http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201201/10/game-20120110-114734-c0e49387.html

Reyk

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 146
  • Respect: +24
    • View Profile
Re: Victory by Develop?!?
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2012, 05:13:04 am »
0

I wish I could give specific rules. I just get it when there's lots of 3s and 4s I want and it won't bring me too many terminals. Take a look at this interesting game from earlier today:

http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201201/10/game-20120110-114734-c0e49387.html

I somehow knew it would be that game when I read your post without checking the link ;-)
Brave decision to take the third terminal there, but Walled village made up for it.

I think I messed it up at turn 4:
http://councilroom.com/game?game_id=game-20120110-114734-c0e49387.html#califax-show-turn-4

I was used to open Amb/Silver rather than Amb/Amb and perhaps it's not a great idea to give away 2 Coppers two times in a row early with double Amb.

I dragged the game on too much, sorry, because I didn't realise the margin was already so big (miscounted Duchies perhaps). It might well have gone behind move 40 ...
Logged

Empathy

  • Moneylender
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 151
  • Respect: +40
    • View Profile
Re: Victory by Develop?!?
« Reply #27 on: January 11, 2012, 07:28:25 am »
0

http://councilroom.com/game?game_id=game-20120110-124511-d576913f.html

develop turns 5 drops into grand market + monument, topdecked, which *almost* guarantee you another grand market.

Though one might argue that haggler was what really won me the game.
Logged

WanderingWinder

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5275
  • ...doesn't really matter to me
  • Respect: +4386
    • View Profile
    • WanderingWinder YouTube Page
Re: Victory by Develop?!?
« Reply #28 on: January 11, 2012, 09:50:23 am »
0

I wish I could give specific rules. I just get it when there's lots of 3s and 4s I want and it won't bring me too many terminals. Take a look at this interesting game from earlier today:

http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201201/10/game-20120110-114734-c0e49387.html

I somehow knew it would be that game when I read your post without checking the link ;-)
Brave decision to take the third terminal there, but Walled village made up for it.

I think I messed it up at turn 4:
http://councilroom.com/game?game_id=game-20120110-114734-c0e49387.html#califax-show-turn-4

I was used to open Amb/Silver rather than Amb/Amb and perhaps it's not a great idea to give away 2 Coppers two times in a row early with double Amb.

I dragged the game on too much, sorry, because I didn't realise the margin was already so big (miscounted Duchies perhaps). It might well have gone behind move 40 ...
Well, I certainly would have sent back 2 coppers both times in that deck. Winning the deck-size war was, I expected, going to be the game. But you made it very very interesting after I thought I had a big-time lead in deck composition. And I don't think I would have dragged it on less than you did.

Reyk

  • Young Witch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 146
  • Respect: +24
    • View Profile
Re: Victory by Develop?!?
« Reply #29 on: January 11, 2012, 10:21:35 am »
0

Well, I certainly would have sent back 2 coppers both times in that deck.

Hm, but I couldn't buy anything until turn 10 ...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
 

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 20 queries.