It's not about changing his opinion (that's fine), it's about being all independent-minded one day and going with the flow into lackadaisically supporting a lynch he has no strong opinion on the next.
If he had an opinion of his own that Mail-mi was scummy, I'd have expected him to say something.
Oh *rereads the case* hm, I see what you mean now. I still don't agree with it, I think you can read townie behaviour in it just as easily, but it's an ok case, I guess.
@pacovf re: Awaclus being a similar case to mail-mi. That's a good point, though I think Awaclus is much more likely to flip scum. But yeah, he's a meh day 1 lynch for the same reasons as mail-mi... and you'll notice he's not my preferred one.
There's a fundamental difference between the two: Awaclus would strictly be a lurker lynch. That means no accountability whatsoever if we lynch him. Nobody voting for mail-mi is doing so because of his lack of content, it's because what little there is, is scummy, so they won't be able to deflect responsibility tomorrow (should he happen to flip town).
That being said, I don't like the way Awaclus has been lurking. Most lurkers are just passive, not checking the game all that often, then posting a quick thought or two when they log in. Awaclus has been following the game closely, and just choosing not to post anything. Normally I would argue very strongly against a D1 lurker lynch, but I wouldn't feel so strongly about it in this specific case. Still, I would prefer a lynch elsewhere.
The problem is that you offer three lynches. WW and skip are town, IMHO, and Awaclus is a lurker lynch. So there's no common ground between our positions.
UoS just legitimately used "lackadaisically" in a sentence. Keep this in mind when deciding the MVP for this game silver.
Hear, hear.