Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Anything better than BM here?  (Read 1210 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Titandrake

  • Mountebank
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2210
  • Respect: +2856
    • View Profile
Anything better than BM here?
« on: May 03, 2014, 07:00:26 pm »
0
http://www.gokosalvager.com/static/logprettifier.html?/20140503/log.535afb44e4b0ca5aa53bd41b.1399157917069.txt

I feel like this is the kind of board where just one different card turns it into something completely ridiculous. I ended up playing Expand-BM, didn't pick up Fortune Teller because it would make Lookout better, but is any Golem madness reasonable here?
Logged
I have a blog! It's called Sorta Insightful. Check it out?

amalloy

  • Witch
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 453
  • Respect: +620
    • View Profile
    • Twitch stream
Re: Anything better than BM here?
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2014, 07:02:21 pm »
+2


Code: [Select]
Fortune Teller, Lookout, Trade Route, Quarry, Remodel, Talisman, Golem, Horn of Plenty, Outpost, Expand
Logged

DG

  • Governor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4074
  • Respect: +2624
    • View Profile
Re: Anything better than BM here?
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2014, 07:29:55 pm »
0
For a treasure deck the simulator suggests opening fortune teller/lookout and there could be room for a late expand or trade route too.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 07:31:16 pm by DG »
Logged

luser

  • Tactician
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • Respect: +353
    • View Profile
Re: Anything better than BM here?
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2014, 07:06:30 am »
0
Colonies here so there might be time for golem. A problem is that you want only two expands and golems as your actions. I would open quarry/silver here for early expand then go for potion and golem. It needs testing as solo game if it is fast enough and my net is slow so I would try it next week earliest.
Logged
Pages: [1]
 

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 20 queries.