Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
 on: November 17, 2018, 04:10:45 pm 
Started by rinkworks - Last post by Minotaur
How about a Royal X theme?  This one's probably balanced:

Royal Merchant
Cost: <8>

+1 Card
+1 Action
You may discard a Silver from your hand.  If you do, +$4.

 on: November 17, 2018, 04:01:14 pm 
Started by traces Around - Last post by Awaclus
Awaclus 3-1 Bryan


 on: November 17, 2018, 04:00:31 pm 
Started by ehunt - Last post by ThetaSigma12

 on: November 17, 2018, 03:58:47 pm 
Started by ehunt - Last post by Beyond Awesome

 on: November 17, 2018, 03:50:34 pm 
Started by greybirdofprey - Last post by crj
I agree: for now, their meaning is identical.

However, it's not impossible that some day Donald X. will introduce a "the next card you buy is half price" effect or similar...

 on: November 17, 2018, 03:22:11 pm 
Started by ehunt - Last post by faust

 on: November 17, 2018, 02:52:16 pm 
Started by ehunt - Last post by ehunt
Name a card that's a few expansions old that is better now than when it came out. That means that the card itself has improved because it is good on more boards (thanks to the new expansions), not that the community has gotten better at playing the card. Then, argue that the other people are wrong.

Counting House (this one's easy; there's two game-winning combos with Counting House where there used to be zero.)
Band of Misfits (not sure why but def. true -- broadly: more good 4s, more cards favoring tactical decisions / flexibility)

 on: November 17, 2018, 02:29:44 pm 
Started by Seprix - Last post by faust
You didn't even say to which cause!

 on: November 17, 2018, 01:39:16 pm 
Started by Doom_Shark - Last post by Commodore Chuckles

 on: November 17, 2018, 12:04:44 pm 
Started by Jeebus - Last post by Jeebus
I don't know how best to phrase it instead, but I think you should avoid the phrasing "play X as a Treasure".  When Crown first appeared on the scene, some people got confused about how it worked (primarily when played with Storyteller) because they thought in terms of playing it as an action or playing it as a treasure, instead of thinking in terms of playing it in a particular phase and then doing what it told them to do in that phase.

Perhaps "play X (because it is a Treasure)" might be an alternative phrasing.

I definitely thought about that, but I thought that it was better to just go for the most straight-forward wording. You can play a Treasure, so you choose X as that Treasure. Hopefully the people who were confused about that (if they read this thread) know how it works now.

EDIT: Well, I changed it now anyway. :)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 17 queries.