Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Mic Qsenoch

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67
1626
Dominion World Masters / Re: DominionStrategy Qualifying Day Results
« on: June 24, 2012, 04:03:46 pm »
zxcvbn2 advances because he has the most 3rd place placings?

No, its the top four performers overall from all the pods that advance.

1627
Dominion World Masters / Re: DominionStrategy Qualifying Day Results
« on: June 24, 2012, 03:17:06 pm »
Atariman 2, Mic Qsenoch 2, AHoppy 0, Polk 0

Game 1: http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201206/24/game-20120624-111324-38249db2.html
Turn Order: Mic, Polk, AHoppy, atariman
#1 atariman486: 31 points
#2 Mic Qsenoch: 29 points
#3 AHoppy: 25 points
#4 Polk5440: 23 points

Game 2: http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201206/24/game-20120624-112318-ee81e18c.html
Turn Order: Polk, AHoppy, atariman, Mic
#1 atariman486: 24 points
#2 AHoppy: 23 points
#3 Polk5440: 20 points
#4 Mic Qsenoch: 19 points

Game 3: http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201206/24/game-20120624-113626-48b1d66a.html
Turn Order: AHoppy, atariman, Mic, Polk
#1 Mic Qsenoch: 10 points
#2 Polk5440: 9 points
#3 AHoppy: 8 points
#4 atariman486: 1 point

Game 4: http://dominion.isotropic.org/gamelog/201206/24/game-20120624-120712-2a494751.html
Turn Order: atariman, Mic, Polk, AHoppy
#1 Mic Qsenoch: 48 points
#2 Polk5440: 44 points
#3 atariman486: 37 points
#4 AHoppy: 30 points

1629
Dominion Articles / Re: Merchant Ship
« on: June 13, 2012, 11:19:52 pm »
Quote from: Justice Potter Stewart
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["engine deck"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.

Concurring opinion, Merchant Ship v. f.DS

1631
GokoDom / Re: IsoDom 5: Round 1 Thread
« on: June 09, 2012, 05:54:09 pm »
Do you mean June 18? I thought the rounds were a week long.

1632
Puzzles and Challenges / Re: Bob's winning deck
« on: June 08, 2012, 06:01:11 pm »
And what if your opponents are playing Double Tactician decks?

edit: Never mind, you specified play areas are empty.

1633
Puzzles and Challenges / Re: Bob's winning deck
« on: June 08, 2012, 05:35:32 pm »
You can do it with Warehouse instead of Cellar, as it draws nothing.

Warehouse only lets you discard three, at one point he needs to discard five. Probably Vault would be a good replacement.

Also, when you KC - masqerade the second time, don't you have another masquerade in hand? So you would have to pass that, and this would decrease the number of cards you burn and make it an incomplete pin.

1635
Simulation / Re: How many stashes do you want in Chancellor/Stash?
« on: June 02, 2012, 07:07:42 pm »
Having two cards to draw chancellor (3 stashes) doesn't double your chances compared to one (four stashes). Flipping two coins doesn't double your chance of seeing heads compared to one coin.

On the silver thing, I don't know the answer, but having silver does make duchy buys more likely on your non stash turns.

1640
GokoDom / Re: IsoDom 5: Sign-Up Thread
« on: May 27, 2012, 12:12:14 am »
I'm in.

1641
You're right, its a fair comparison to make for evaluating the card. There's just no need to use the word "strictly" here, which implies the first copy is better than gold in all situations. Its a nitpicky point, but words are useless if we don't use them consistently.

1642
It's a bad thing that the first copy of this is strictly better than Gold :/

In Dominion, cards with different costs can't be "strictly better/worse" than each other because of trash for benefit cards. Even if Loot was just a $5 Gold it wouldn't be "strictly better".

1649
Dominion Isotropic / Re: First player bias
« on: May 02, 2012, 08:21:48 pm »
So long as each player wants to do his best, and second place "counts" more than third, I think there is very little room for collusion or kingmaking in 3 player Dominion. Not zero, but very little.

Making second place worth more than third doesn't necessarily reduce kingmaking. As tlloyd mentioned earlier, this could allow a person in first to choose who gets second/third (I guess this is actually princemaking). This could be a strategic decision or a petty one. And it doesn't address situations where a person's actions don't improve his final standing but do decide the positions of the other two.

I can't say how often these situations come up, but I have seen it happen (and done it) in some multiplayer games.

1650
I was wondering why it took you so long to start that game. I had no idea you were taking it to the next level! I wasn't ready for the next level.

Pages: 1 ... 64 65 [66] 67

Page created in 0.33 seconds with 19 queries.