I would change the wording of the last sentence to: "Trash all cards on your Soothsayer mat at the end of the game."
Are you sure that isn't insane? It's pretty easy exp growth.
KC Scholars -> 24 cards in hand?
18, since you only have 3 more to discard assuming we're talking about starting out the turn this way.
I have a question about Soothsayer. Do the cards on your mat count for scoring purposes? And how would it interact with Trader and Watchtower?#1 - Soothsayer by LastFootnote with 21 points (Proteus)
$4 - Action-Attack
+2 Cards
Each other player puts a Curse from the Supply on his Soothsayer mat.
--
In games using this, at the start of your Buy phase you may discard a Treasure from your hand. If you don't, gain all the cards on your Soothsayer mat.
The way I understand it, you don't immediately gain the curses, so they don't count towards your score until you choose to gain them. And, since they're in limbo on the mat, you can wait until you have Trader or Watchtower in hand to take the curses, but can't reveal either when Soothsayer is played. (But you can still play other reactions).
What do people think of Mine for $4? I think I remember Donald even hinting at this one before too...
Farmland is like a Harem that only can spend its money for Provinces, and that does something useful immediately when you buy it.
If you buy a Farmland, trash an Estate and turn it into a useful 4, you've replaced an estate with a 4$ card and a Silver with a restriction. So it's kind of like you underspent your 6 on a 4 so you could turn an estate into a Silver that can only pay for Provinces.
Depends on the 4. Much less useful card in sets with good trashing.
I really wouldnt be surprised if it was a pay per expansion type thing though with how some of the beta menus are set up.
Huh. That would be terrible.
To start off discussion, here's a list of peddler cards I think are too strong or too weak to get an approval point.
Canopus,
Vega,
Procyon(weak),
Archernar(weak),
Hadar,
Capella(weak),
Altair(weak),
Antares,
Formalhaut(weak),
Deneb,
Regulus,
Adara(altVP-strong,Provweak),
Shaula,
Mirfak,
Wezen(weak),
Alhena(weak),
Murzim,
Alphard,
Obviously not. But why not make the discussion interesting?
I think the answer as to which $5 could cost $4, by the way, should be clear. Duchy
I have so many ideas I don't know which one to submit!
If I write you a C program that can calculate the alternative vote system for you, would you use it?
This is obviously false. I like candidate A best, but B is, I guess, okay. There's, I don't know, 4 candidates. I vote A and B. B beats A by a single approval. I have harmed the chances that my favourite won by voting for B. Of course, going in, I could have only voted A, but then this makes it more likely I get C or D. Now, I do think people will vote for more than just their favourite, but I was responding to LF's answer to my previous objection, which is my main thrust, and which I believe still stands.
For some situations, it's much better than Throne Room, because it turns (for example) a Smithy a super-Wharf minus buys.But takes two cards rather than one, and you still need them to collide.
But more importantly, it is not at all clear to me that this is indeed better than double the smithy NOW (which I want to let you know, I mean to shout like that bratty girl from Willy Wonka).
If you go too far one way, like towards LastFootnote's system, you'll knock out the most objectionable cards, which can at some point include the best options.
Prince's Court
Action
Cost: 7
You may choose a non-proscribed card in your hand and play it thrice.
______________
Set-up: Before the game starts, every player chooses a card to be proscribed.
Eh, you get the idea. Notice that you can play this on treasures.
People who asked FunSockets directly for an invite.
Saboteur can be effective when your opponent has Chapeled down and relies heavily on a single card, such as Minion.
