There isn't really a case on e. (At least, I posted one, but I flip back and forward on whether I even believe it myself.)
I think most people are voting e for just slightly scummy things / turns of phrase he's said.
First one for me was his second post of the game, where he answers the question that he asked in his previous post.
Joth and Dylan each mentioned other ones when they laid their first votes. Galzria possibly also, I can't remember.
e went through a phase of announcing about 4 different people were town, or day 1 passes for him. Which is possibly towny, but so much of it in a row just seemed like he was laying into the "faust doesn't like this, look I'm going to do it anyway to show I don't care". (Ok, what I'm saying here is maybe just similar to mathdude's "scumhunting" of MiX; I was already thinking e was likely scum by that time.)
Otherwise, I don't think e has done much (or any?) scumhunting. There was a bit possibly on gkrieg, but he didn't have much to say when challenged. And of course in that context there was this exchange, which I still don't know what to make of:
Gkrieg's read-and-reply regarding math feels.... Genuine? But I don't see it as townie.
Just feels like he was about to white knight math then decided to keep some shade going.
Not calling math scum, but just keeping the option alive
Genuine?
White-knighting + shading?
Which one?
Genuine in the sense that he read the first post, reacted one way, then kept reading and reacted another way
And then the interactions with mathdude, who may well be scum.
PPE: 7
