I called mine seer.I fixed amulet. Sorry, it's sideways, fix that later. I renamed it heirloom to comply with adventures. I can change it back to amulet if people would prefer that.
I like it. Now we need soothsayer renamed. I suggest Clairvoyant.
It's Harbinger, not Harbringer.Oops.
Is my Crystal Ball art so bad?It's just my preference. Part of it is the text is too bold, I'll fix that as well.
So here's my plan of cards to redo. N means new name, A means new art, C means different cost, and E means new effect.So now I'll have to reprint so many fan cards with different names and art. Battlefield, fountain, tomb, castle, keep, farmer's market, and maybe even more. I'd be willing to post new versions if people wanted them.
yes please post your new mock-ups in the variants forum. I have much appreciated those you have redone in the past and will much appreciate new ones you post. thanks in advance
I preordered Empires from Miniature Market I think, so I don't know when mine is coming..Same here.
You could just set Dignitary aside until the start of your next turn.Dignitary + Fortress + Tomb = ∞ VP, in a small enough deck.
It doesn't work without some additional tweaking, but maybe you can use the "react by playing" that was used by Caravan Guard to get around that.
Like it is kind of close if the reaction said "You can reveal this to, trash a card from your hand, and then play this. (It's way worse because of the putting cards back thing, but maybe the play effect can be adjusted to make the reaction work like it does now.)
Would "put this in play to trash a card from your hand and then draw to 5" work?
It's very gimmicky, so I'm not sure it is the right solution.
I would like to avoid "Put this into play" if possible, since it just makes you ask, "So do I play it or what?"
But how about the new attacks, Catapult and Enchantress? How do you think they will measure up? Discuss.They both seem top-tier stuff. Catapulting a rocks is very mean. And enchantress, oh man that will really make some people mad. Just imagine playing your tournament to get followers only to receive a cantrip. Or not being able to prince that militia, or not being able to to put teacher on the tavern mat, the list goes on.
Jester is so much fun. Everything about the card is amazing. It's the closest thing to a perfect card in Dominion. Next game I will start both players with 10 Jesters, and we will play from thereYou'll need to buy a lot of Cornucopia sets for that....
Okay, I'll stop gushing about Jester now.
Just put your ferry token on it before the game starts.Or just use Scout twice, since no one buys it anyway.
Scout is the perfect bane for YW! Even that card can have it's appeal. Or maybe you just want to be Young Witched?
Bane is a 2 or 3 cost, scout costs 4
As someone posted on BGG, the Rio Grande Games site now lists Dominion: Empires' release date as May 31.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
I don't buy jester for the attack either(I buy it to gain good cards)
I guess I get your point. I sill think goons isn't that good of an attack card, it's more of an alt-VP card. But I can see reasons why you would vote it over jester.When it discards Goons from the top of your deck sure you get a goons, but it just prevented you from playing one of your good cards during this shuffle. That could be a sizeable attack if it's the only goons in your deck. Sure, that won't always happen, but 9 times out of 10 it will either discard a good card or junk with a bad one.Sea Hag.
But to be honest, I think you are missing the point. You claimed that jester was somehow more favoritism-inducing than goons as an attack because the isolated attack from goons is not that interesting. I claim that jester is the same way, and so when you say that goons votes are only for the non-attack and this somehow gives jester some higher ground, you are mistaken. I couldn't care less why I vote for goons, but this as a reason to vote against it is poor.
When it discards Goons from the top of your deck sure you get a goons, but it just prevented you from playing one of your good cards during this shuffle. That could be a sizeable attack if it's the only goons in your deck. Sure, that won't always happen, but 9 times out of 10 it will either discard a good card or junk with a bad one.You guys are voting for goons because it's an alt-vp card, not because it attacks. Goons doesn't deserve to win, most of the time the attack is the icing on the cake and it's the VP's your after. It does all the end-of turn-stuff? If it's the last turn the attack means nothing.* Jester's central focus is an attack. And it can get you goons.
That sounds kind of like a gainer to me. The potential for attack is variable and only sometimes hits. So jester is just a gainer which sometimes happens to attack when it doesn't do it's real job (edge cases with guaranteed cursing accepted, and as an added bonus, I don't really care). Goons is alt-vp which always attacks. Hmmmm.
Goons
goons. it does all of the end-of-turn stuff that you wantYou guys are voting for goons because it's an alt-vp card, not because it attacks. Goons doesn't deserve to win, most of the time the attack is the icing on the cake and it's the VP's your after. It does all the end-of turn-stuff? If it's the last turn the attack means nothing.* Jester's central focus is an attack. And it can get you goons.
Goons!BOOOOOOOOOO!
Thank you so much for your support. I will try to get a better wording. I will re-upload the new cards then. Perhaps you will understand it better then :> I created about 20 Dragoncards and about 70 other cards - this should be only the first view.Other than wording issues, sub-type issues, color issues, etc. the cards look AMAZING! Look forward too seeing what else comes up.
On a random note, I just purchased Tabletop simulator, and I think I correctly uploaded the seasons file that CL posted earlier in the thread, but I don't know how to access it in an actual Dominion app to play with in Tabletop Sim. How do I find it in the game? I know you've worked with it before Asper, so I'm hoping you will be able to help me with my query. ThanksI was going to get TS but I'm waiting till it goes on sale. I'd love to play with you when I get it!
I played with the newer version and it seemed fine. You don't always use it but it's nice having it there.Uh oh, what happened to all the cards?Yeah, most of the cards say "The image you requested is no longer available. Imgur"
Sorry, guys. I made a mistake awhile ago and deleted all the images. I've been meaning to put them back up but haven't remembered when I was in front of the right computer. I haven't been actively working on cards recently, so it's been easy to forget. I'll try to remember to re-upload them tonight.
Thanks
Well a lot of people like it, but it's a bit random for some tastes.
Whenever I change a card slightly, I reduce the number of stars it has without resetting it to zero. Fund for instance used to have 5 stars of testing, but I recently moved the +1 Buy outside the one-shot effect, and haven't yet tested the new version. So really Gambler is the card that's changed the least recently.
For what it's worth, your newer version of Fund looks like it will be more fun and bought more often. Sometimes you just get a sense about a card even without playtesting that you can feel quite confident about.
