It just seems like having you discard a card would really well. It doesn't make the card stronger (generally will make it weaker), while also ensuring that it's ability will always do something.That was my reasoning when I added that part, but AH dissagreed. I can kinda see his side but I still like the built in discarding.
Cavalry should have the Attack type.Ah, poop, accidentally posted the older version.
I'd assume so.Finally, a Landmark which looks like it will make the game more fun. This actually looks really cool. The art is nice too.They're always there, that's why they don't have a cost.
Just a quick question, do you need to by Landmarks to trigger the effects like Events, or are they always there?
And a question for me - you put VP only on non-Gathering Action cards, but do you move VP from Gathering piles? The top line doesn't specify.
This also seems kind of not-fun. Man, I'm not really liking these Landmarks. Then again, Events sort of grew on me over time.That's the gimmick of a lot of landmarks, making you do things you wouldn't otherwise. You can read more here: http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=15966.0
I don't particularly object to changing the bottom of Mortuary to work on any non-Coppers, but it is a substantial boost to its power in Curse/Ruins games that maybe makes one hope that they get junked thereby indirectly punishing the junker quite strongly. Maybe have it work on cards costing $1 or more to include shelters and Poor House?Sure,
. I recall reading a thread that suggested non-coppers, but I'll keep all 3 versions up for preference.
Ossuary-a container or room into which the bones of dead people are placed.
Here's a version of Ossuary, I simply added "From the supply" for clarification.
Man, were do you guys get this awesome art from?
Also, what the heck is an Ossuary?
, and this costs 
. That's significant, but not a huge price drop. The problem is it loses it's power too fast. At all 5 copies will empty pretty quickly, and at only inquisition is easily picked up. Once enough people get Inquisitions then Scholar is really bad. Loan, up there with Forager? Look, you're a great player, and I respect your opinion, but I think you're 100% wrong in this instance. I just don't see it.He has some good points at least. He's 90%-93% right.
I didn't see it continued on the next page. Let me (e)state the obvious: This has been a p(l)easant experience.Curses! I wanted to make that joke.Witch post? I can't sooth-see any posts, you hag.Wait, Curses are bad? But in the Base Cards edition, people are Raven about them. Now I guess I'll have to eat crow before people give me the bird.You're gonna get some ill-gotten groans for this post.
I swear, the witch pun was hextremely predictable.
Then why is your post so much later? You must be a Swindler!
Curses! I wanted to make that joke.Witch post? I can't sooth-see any posts, you hag.Wait, Curses are bad? But in the Base Cards edition, people are Raven about them. Now I guess I'll have to eat crow before people give me the bird.You're gonna get some ill-gotten groans for this post.
I swear, the witch pun was hextremely predictable.
That just leaves us with two (and a bit) questions:How do landmarks get ranked? Since it's mostly equal opportunity, is it a ranking of how many VP you can get from it?
-How to rankcards
-How to rank split piles
** How to rank the Castles
I think it's pretty obvious that Landmarks should just get their own list.
should be converted to coin costs IMO. Split piles should be seperate, and so should castles. I also would love it if the base cards were thrown in for comparison.
We didn't design the expansion like this.Stronghold is a permaduration Market whereas Valley converts the first Victory card into a Peddler.
I don't think that Stronghold is exciting but the two cards are not really that similar as they would play very differently.
Suppose that both cards are in the same Kingdom. Stronghold might be used during build up, to buy several cheap engine cards, whereas Valley might be used for a rush (green early) or alt-VP.
They are different enough to warrant being different cards for sure. But when designing an expansion, I would try to avoid having a specific niche like "get $1 every turn" filled twice. I think they mentioned thinking about another expansion? Then put one here, one in the other.
I was that donald X said fugitiv3 was too good for 4, i.e. travellers should usually be better than tehir cost. My wording for night patrol needs a FAQ, but yours works too.-Sorcerer is worse than witch. It should have some benefit, such as +$1 or so that gives it an edge.
I don't think there's any issue with a Traveller card being strictly worse or better than another card. The fact that it's a Traveller is enough.
I like valley, but it seems a bit too similar to treasury. Granted, you have to have the victory cards already, but it's still a semi-permanent peddler dependant on victory cards.Except its dependent the other way, so it's almost the opposite.
I'm still 13!There are two people around my age and one closer to 16. It's hard to tell thoughHappy birthday to me!
Happy Birthday, RR :-) Hope to get to play in a Mafia game with you soon!
(Are many other people here super-young?)
I'd just make Scenic Village have the same clause as Champion. You won't often play 10+ terminals, but in the oddball game where you do, tracking will be messy.Scenic village got changed for simplicity, a slight nerf, and so it actually stacked. Yes tracking can be a pain, but it's still about the same as without it.
I like Valley. Not sure if it's correctly priced, but it's a cool card in that it should be quite hard to time when to go for it.
Manuscript is okay-ish, I guess? I'm not particularly excited about another Throne Room variant. Royal Carriage does everthing this wants to do and more.
Stronghold is far more boring than Valley. It is still an okay card, and I wonder if you could pull off a Stronghold-Gardens slog.
I'm not sure how the names of the durations relate to their effect.
