26
Rules Questions / Re: Considering Trader errata
« on: May 05, 2020, 08:37:41 pm »
This fixes a lot of silly rules junk and dumb infinite's.
When I use Crown (or Throne Room I guess) on Small Castle, is it possible to use the "trash this" option both the first and second time playing it to gain the next two Castles?
If not, why? What I want to know is if either of these (hypothetical) rules apply here:
- Crown "loses track" of Small Castle when it trashes itself?
- Small Castle cannot trash itself for benefit when it's already in the trash?
It is actually both of those rules. Either of those things by itself would be enough to stop you from gaining a second castle, and they both hold true.
A classic example of this exact same thing is Throne Room + Mining Village. The fact that you can't trash it twice with Throne Room is spelled out in the official FAQ.
The lose track rule doesn't apply in this case, though. A card that trashes itself can still be played from the trash. E.g., if you play a Tragic Hero with a Throne Room/Crown, and it gets trashed on the first play, you can still play it the second time.
Yesterday I thought it was a good idea to inherit Death Cart.
Turned out that I had a poor grasp about what "this" is. Estate would not trash itself (and not give you the €5) but would trash an Estate from hand.
#isotropicwasbetter
This makes Necromancer way too strong. Necromancer is already strong with the ability to choose whether it plays as a terminal or +1 Action card. Choosing between 0, 1, or 2 actions would be bonkers.
With the new errata overlord as tormentor (first cards played) gives hex. since it counts as overlord and then tormentor.
On a related note: What is the reason that Provinces still end the game in Colony games, instead of Colonies simply taking their place for the end-game condition?Colonies and Fleet each tweak the game-end condition; on reflection I'm kinda surprised there aren't more things that change it.I've tried some.
In BM, Margrave sifting may actually help your opponent, so Tragic Hero isn't strictly worse.95+% cards are worse than margrave. That is really is no Argument against tragic hero.
There are, however, no cards that are strictly worse than Margrave at the same cost. Except for Tragic Hero in BM decks.