51
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M114: Wheel of Time II - Game Over! Town Wins!
« on: March 29, 2018, 06:58:33 pm »
my scumpool for today was gonna be witherweaver space and theorel which is hilarious
If SK killed scum, that means that our vig killed town N1 (if they'd killed scum then only town would be left, so game would be over)uh
And sorry for the weird structure above.i forgive u
I was actually thinking there is no way schadd and WW are scum partners when mcmc did the thing where he said something about them being tvt.is this the scum trap
Or...maybe mcmc's reaction is relevant because it is what inspired my scum-read, whereas I don't particularly remember anyone else's reaction. But lending credence to a town-read is a whole different ball-game IMO than lending credence to a confirmed town player. Regarding your conversation with TWM, I dunno, it didn't seem like there was a need to interject into it? I think my points were already made, none of them changed.i disagree that it is a different ballpark, the probability of a townread being town is p high. even a not-townread
lmfao there are two scumMy points in redgosh wouldn't you think so. but people do do it. m102 galzria and pps both bussed and lynched faust d1 three players not two. ww empty bussed both of his partners in 104three players not two. i don't immediately remember it for other people who were on wagon. but like people do specifically try to get things like your unvote to happen, as far as i understand that is a significant reason for pps' hammer thing. huh? Nevermind. I don't really care.that is what i was getting at with the people don't tend to defend partners thing. a lot of people here overvalue vca and are conscious of counterwagons. in response, i have observed very often that scum here will bus often and make little attempt to dislodge a scum wagon if one is building.Not day 1. Bussing on day 1 is basically suicide. Especially with only two partners.
And I am not even talking about defending. I am just talking about a subtle move toward someone other than mcmc to make it a viable option. I actually anticipated people suspecting me of exactly that when I moved off mcmc which is why I didn't exactly spell it out yesterday.
But OK. I am not going to convince you of this. If you are town, then you are convinced you are town and did a townie thing. If you are scum I am not trying to convince you. But am interested if this idea is working for anyone else or if I am totally off base?
i don't suppose the thing i did was townie it wasn't. especially the way it happened. It isn't just that you voted for mcmc that was scummy. It was what you did before and how you voted (idk i could have thought it through more probably, if i had remembered pps would hammer immediately i wouldn't have voted) but i also don't suppose that i unilaterally should have not voted according to your thing I wouldn't have minded the vote had you and pps at least given it some thought (and publicly shown this by posting said thoughts instead of saying that you had thoughts retroactively).
And again. I am not super interested in what you are saying. I want to hear from everyone else.
There are X number of townies. Can any of you townies give me some sort of input on my thoughts here?
Seriously?
Both schadd and theorel's votes for each other look like they are both trying to justify voting for the other.i mean i agree with you about theorel on me, that is largely what i am scumreading him for
It rather sucks that my two biggest townreads are the two with wagons, but maybe the game is dead because there are two or three scummy people out there who have observed that town will just eat itself with little-to-no input from them.
Vote: Space for conveniently townreading the two main wagons--I don't buy your logic, I think you're trying to place yourself in the "see I was right camp" if we lynch town.they townread both of us well in advance of us being wagons
gosh wouldn't you think so. but people do do it. m102 galzria and pps both bussed and lynched faust d1. ww empty bussed both of his partners in 104. i don't immediately remember it for other people who were on wagon. but like people do specifically try to get things like your unvote to happen, as far as i understand that is a significant reason for pps' hammer thing.that is what i was getting at with the people don't tend to defend partners thing. a lot of people here overvalue vca and are conscious of counterwagons. in response, i have observed very often that scum here will bus often and make little attempt to dislodge a scum wagon if one is building.Not day 1. Bussing on day 1 is basically suicide. Especially with only two partners.
And I am not even talking about defending. I am just talking about a subtle move toward someone other than mcmc to make it a viable option. I actually anticipated people suspecting me of exactly that when I moved off mcmc which is why I didn't exactly spell it out yesterday.
But OK. I am not going to convince you of this. If you are town, then you are convinced you are town and did a townie thing. If you are scum I am not trying to convince you. But am interested if this idea is working for anyone else or if I am totally off base?
I'm not sure I follow what you're "interested" in. My original collection of thoughts is just the things that seemed salient from the previous day as I considered each player (and scanned their posts to remember what happened). One of those facts is that mcmc thought there was scum in your argument with witherweaver. My reaction to that fact, given that mcmc is town, is to temper my original reaction, because I have no particular reason to believe that my read of the situation was in fact the correct one. I'm not embracing mcmc's reaction, because I have no particular reason to believe that his read was in fact the correct one.you seemed to me to be cherrypicking
It feels like you accused me of taking mcmc's read and deciding you must be scum because of it, and so I explained the "value" judgments in my reasoning (i.e. recognizing mcmc's alignment reduced my town-read, looking at the rest of the day turned it into a scum-read), but then you accused me of not making a value judgment? I'm not sure what kind of "value" you're expecting...unless you just mean the original post? I didn't offer much value there for anyone until the conclusion...I think you're just stuck on a style thing.
gosh i guess not!i think i looked at vote count 1.3 and thought "he he ha ha it is only i and galzria voting ww now that is interesting" and that mcmc wagon was probably gonna be a thing since i and people tend to sightread him quickly and he seemed reasonably scum to me and i assumed other people would see thatSo you got nothing out of what you were, supposedly, waiting for? Cool.
there wasn't anything in particular i was expecting him to do, he had seemed committed to ww scum and i thought the way he would switch to mcmc if he did would be interesting somehow. i guess it wasn't really, maybe pending ww's flip
what did i ignoreSure.I think the reasons there are pretty much sufficient. In addition, I do not think you have played a town game. There has not been posts that felt like typical schadd. This isn't enough reason to vote for you, but nor is it enough reason to not vote for you given the above. You haven't been around as much, especially later and later after being around earlier. Again, not a reason to vote alone, but it isn't making my impression of you be townie. Something that I typically get from you. Maybe that is just because it is still early in the whole game?have u townread me like ever
TL;DR. You have done some scummy stuff and you haven't left your normal townie impression
And you sure did ignore on a lot of stuff to only fixate on the least important part. I mean, this is like the least substantial portion of anything I am finding you scummy for.
What I want to know is why you (schadd) thought it was a good idea to vote for mcmc after seeing (that I pointed out) that he had been the only wagon with more than 2 votes all game long? Didn't that seem weird to you? If mcmc had been scum, all he and partner had to do was move to a wagon with another vote and now you have a competing wagon instead of letting him become the default lynch. mcmc as scum wouldn't play like that. But I point that out and instead of introspection we have two "derp" votes after each other to make sure the vote goes through. I have to think at least one of those was from scum. So you or pps. Pick one.that is what i was getting at with the people don't tend to defend partners thing. a lot of people here overvalue vca and are conscious of counterwagons. in response, i have observed very often that scum here will bus often and make little attempt to dislodge a scum wagon if one is building.
i did also mean "mcmc seems scummy from that post" when i said the vote was reasonableWhat was weird was that you voted, again without reasoning, immediately after I brought up, what I thought was a pretty good point that no other wagons had been seen that whole day and that this meant mcmc was less likely to be scum....
In addition I felt that your example of one interaction with mcmc was weak and forced, about the tvt thing. But you still hadn't ever commented or given an opinion on a read on mcmc either way until I called you out and you voted for him.
your vote for him below for context
i think i looked at vote count 1.3 and thought "he he ha ha it is only i and galzria voting ww now that is interesting" and that mcmc wagon was probably gonna be a thing since i and people tend to sightread him quickly and he seemed reasonably scum to me and i assumed other people would see thatI could have sworn someone already asked schadd to explain the how gall would react part, but could not find it. schadd can you elaborate?Reason is that he has stayed completely away from the mcmc wagon. It is obviously the biggest thing going on in the game, but he hasn't voted for him or defended him. He has just ignored it except to say "reasonable" to me and someone else that voted for him.i wanted to see if/how galz would leave ww
If mcmc is town then schadd stays off the mislynch wagon. If mcmc is scum, then I don't expect schadd to act this way, but I don't really think mcmc is scum.
i asked mcmc what he thought was not tvt
vote: mcmc L-1 people don't tend to defend scum partners on this site, or even avoid voting them really
i townread swan
what i'm interested in is that you haven't seemed to make a value judgement of mcmc's readsTrue, but now I know that mcmc actually found one of you scummy rather than just trying to get one of you lynched. So, I'm dialing back my town-v-town read on that interaction some. Then I scum-read you for the rest of the day, which included that odd "wanted to see what galz did" post.schadd: He has that argument with ww, which now known-town mcmc thought included scum.i mean you thought it didn't and if you are town you know yourself to be town
What was weird was that you voted, again without reasoning, immediately after I brought up, what I thought was a pretty good point that no other wagons had been seen that whole day and that this meant mcmc was less likely to be scum.good golly it is within my means to give reasoning for a vote as scum
In addition I felt that your example of one interaction with mcmc was weak and forced, about the tvt thing. But you still hadn't ever commented or given an opinion on a read on mcmc either way until I called you out and you voted for him.
your vote for him below for context
I think the reasons there are pretty much sufficient. In addition, I do not think you have played a town game. There has not been posts that felt like typical schadd. This isn't enough reason to vote for you, but nor is it enough reason to not vote for you given the above. You haven't been around as much, especially later and later after being around earlier. Again, not a reason to vote alone, but it isn't making my impression of you be townie. Something that I typically get from you. Maybe that is just because it is still early in the whole game?have u townread me like ever
TL;DR. You have done some scummy stuff and you haven't left your normal townie impression
schadd: He has that argument with ww, which now known-town mcmc thought included scum.i mean you thought it didn't and if you are town you know yourself to be town
weirdmy reason for not immediately voting mcmc?
Schadd is a big ole null. I can't read that guy, like at all. I was actually thinking there is no way schadd and WW are scum partners when mcmc did the thing where he said something about them being tvt. So, I get where mcmc was coming from on that except I was a bit more specific in my analysis. Either one could be scum but likely not both.you say either ww or i could be scum and then you say it is definitely ww that is scum
WW, on the surface doesn't look straight up scummy. If there's scum between him and schadd it's him, though. He's definitely avoiding positions that put him into much scrutiny but being sure to be suspicious of everyone else.
do you have any other reasoning for me being scum than what you've posted? 281 and 286Vote: Schadd
Genius play. Just genius
[serious]
-somebody did something someone else asked them to do today. this fact is very alignment-indicative.-iguana said scum could vote
-at least 1 person copped mcmc.
-there's something related to PRs that somebody mentioned on this last page (1350+) that makes me deeply ashamed and i expect a little bit of upsetment in postgame. there weren't any mod errors or anything. this fact is also alignment-indicative