Also, Nik. Why vote Voltaire And then just leave?Do you mean not give a reason? My reason is that earlier in the thread, I thought Volitare claimed he was Mafia, based on this:
I AM IN MAFIA AGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAINNow I realize he was talking about the game Mafia, not the Mafia faction. So, Unvote.
Thought: Have everyone claim in the Everyone QT under a pseudonym, just so we have an idea of how many of each color there are and can play accordingly.That's not a bad idea. ('Mystery Man' already has claimed, in fact.) It could also tell us if players in the same color have different wincons or the same wincon; plus if there are any black-aligned players at the start of the game (or if they were changed over the course of the first day.) I'm all for it.
I don't know if I should claim yet. Let's just say that I need to keep the people of my same color alive.Vote: Jorbles
Your win condition is different then mine.
What's your win-con?
Well (admitting I have a color here), from what I understand, each color's wincon is different. But at the same time, it seems like there is a separate faction with the power to turn people black--thereby killing them on a subsequent day.So do you think we should reveal our 'true colors?'
Claiming would be interesting here. Some people have already done so in various qt's (mostly in the "everyone" one I think). Barring knowing who your allies are, it seems like hunting for the scum who can kill/blacken people might be a good idea. There's just so little to go on. . .
I am not the cop. But now that we know that our strongest lynch candidate is town, then it's really only between Shraeye and Faust. Faust seems kind of towny, and since Shraeye says he's really busy, so I say we don't lynch now.I'm the cop. Can we please talk about a Voltaire lynch now?
No.
Everyone claim if you're the cop or not.
I'm not.
If ADK is telling the truth, we lynch either shraeye or faust and I don't really care which.
I made a typo. I meant Shraeye, not Sgraeye.Because I didn't really understand Sgraeye's explanation, and he first time it wasn't answered.Gah, no, we have to pick something. vote: shraeye. That's L-1 on shraeye (which Nik didn't announce - Nik, it's bad form not to announce that the next vote will hammer/lynch someone).What is meant by 'hammer' and 'L-1?'
If you want to vote shraeye, don't hammer him (or we lynch you tomorrow for being obv!scum). State intent to hammer, and then shraeye gets a chance to claim.
Why does Nik have to ask about L-1 again, after asking *twice* on day 1:In that case I will unvote
The way Ichi goes back and forth with putting mcmc at L-1 is most interesting.
Umm...I'm sorry, what does L-1 mean? Also, what does Ichi have to do with me unvoting?Again, what does L-1 mean?It means that somebody is 1 vote away from being locked in as the lynch. As soon as somebody reaches 5 votes (in general, it is the smallest integer that is > half the townsize), the day is over, although a brief twilight-period may exist where the thread is still open, and we can still post. But the lynch has been decided at that point.
Plus hammering was talked about multiple times on day 1.
unvote
Ah shit.
Nik, explanation? 'Cause this makes you look like 100% coached scum.
Also, can someone unvote shraeye? We don't want a scum quickhammer here...Good idea.
Because I didn't really understand Sgraeye's explanation, and he first time it wasn't answered.Gah, no, we have to pick something. vote: shraeye. That's L-1 on shraeye (which Nik didn't announce - Nik, it's bad form not to announce that the next vote will hammer/lynch someone).What is meant by 'hammer' and 'L-1?'
If you want to vote shraeye, don't hammer him (or we lynch you tomorrow for being obv!scum). State intent to hammer, and then shraeye gets a chance to claim.
Why does Nik have to ask about L-1 again, after asking *twice* on day 1:In that case I will unvote
The way Ichi goes back and forth with putting mcmc at L-1 is most interesting.
Umm...I'm sorry, what does L-1 mean? Also, what does Ichi have to do with me unvoting?Again, what does L-1 mean?It means that somebody is 1 vote away from being locked in as the lynch. As soon as somebody reaches 5 votes (in general, it is the smallest integer that is > half the townsize), the day is over, although a brief twilight-period may exist where the thread is still open, and we can still post. But the lynch has been decided at that point.
Plus hammering was talked about multiple times on day 1.
unvote
Ah shit.
Nik, explanation? 'Cause this makes you look like 100% coached scum.
Gah, no, we have to pick something. vote: shraeye. That's L-1 on shraeye (which Nik didn't announce - Nik, it's bad form not to announce that the next vote will hammer/lynch someone).What is meant by 'hammer' and 'L-1?'
If you want to vote shraeye, don't hammer him (or we lynch you tomorrow for being obv!scum). State intent to hammer, and then shraeye gets a chance to claim.
