Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - faust

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 955
1176
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 08, 2021, 03:34:40 am »
After you mentioned it for the first time I went back searching for the post, and yes I can see how you thought it was a crumb, but it wasn’t intended that way.
Here you deny that you intended the EFHW posts as a crumb, but leaving a fake crumb in order to be nightkilled would be the only possible town motivation for what you did.

I would also like to reiterate on this bit - by "lean into it" I was just using the letterkenny verbiage that was being joked about previously in the game. A more well worded response should of been "I didn't deny it".
I straight up don't understand this. You put "lean into it" into quotation but I have no idea where that is supposed to be quoted from, or what kind of point you are making.

yeah I get that and I regret doing it. It is from a Canadian comedy show named letterkenny. It mean "to keep going with it" in this context
I still don't understand the post that you made.

1177
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 08, 2021, 03:34:13 am »
I mean, he doesn't need to kill EFHW. It helps his claim but it's not integral.

I am more convinced now that Swowl is scum than that iguana is, but it wouldn't be sensible to exile outside of e/iguana today.

So when you say this it is essentially either me and E or me and Iguana right?

ppe faust
Yes.

1178
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 08, 2021, 03:31:39 am »
After you mentioned it for the first time I went back searching for the post, and yes I can see how you thought it was a crumb, but it wasn’t intended that way.
Here you deny that you intended the EFHW posts as a crumb, but leaving a fake crumb in order to be nightkilled would be the only possible town motivation for what you did.

I would also like to reiterate on this bit - by "lean into it" I was just using the letterkenny verbiage that was being joked about previously in the game. A more well worded response should of been "I didn't deny it".
I straight up don't understand this. You put "lean into it" into quotation but I have no idea where that is supposed to be quoted from, or what kind of point you are making.

1179
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 4)
« on: October 08, 2021, 03:26:56 am »
It's nice that your partner iguana made sure you had some more time to put this all together. It's still not convincing.

1180
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 4)
« on: October 08, 2021, 01:07:27 am »
It's D4, sorry.

1181
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 4)
« on: October 08, 2021, 01:07:02 am »
Swowl - when he's here, he posts thoughtful stuff, but mostly seems to not be around or contribute much (1 week, for 1 game day... okay. But 3 and counting could be hiding)
this is what I mean about scum to chum lists by the way. It's D3 with a scum flip and mathdude doesn't have anything better on Swowl than "he's lurking". That's not going to help us.

1182
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: The Necro Wars
« on: October 08, 2021, 01:02:26 am »
3. people saying Elon Musk is a bad guy, especially if they pretend to care about climate change (sorry faust)
Let's annoy you some more I guess.

How do you think Elon Musk helps with tackling climate change?

1183
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 4)
« on: October 08, 2021, 12:51:56 am »
faust - start of D3 was just way too much... seems like some hidden agenda
Can you be more precise? What agenda would I have followed there?

Also, I know this isn't going to go well with some of you, but if there is 3 ICs to choose from, why would scum!me go for the one who defended me the hardest?

1184
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 4)
« on: October 08, 2021, 12:50:07 am »
Can everyone post their chum to scum list?

This seems like a good idea... yours obviously gets posted last.
I don't think it's helpful at all. People need to do some rereading, figuring out possible partner interactions. Posting a list of their biases isn't going to accomplish anything.

That said, I know who at least one scum is.

Vote: Swowl

1185
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 4)
« on: October 08, 2021, 12:40:08 am »
also also faust is a good bet either way. because if e IS town it's pretty suspicious how far faust went to sew doubt about his towniness.
I'm very confused. What is this about? And why is it suspicious anyway?

1186
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 05, 2021, 04:17:59 am »
I have no idea why you would disagree. It's painfully obvious to me.

I don't think breadcrumbs are that clear cut. What you said is true, or is not true, and I don't have a particularly good reason to think it's true other than you saying it.
But Swowl has refused to explain his "read" on EFHW, and still could not provide any reason for why he changed his read on her...

1187
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 05, 2021, 03:49:50 am »
I have no idea why you would disagree. It's painfully obvious to me.

1188
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 1)
« on: October 05, 2021, 03:40:20 am »
I get that you want to do a reread, MiX. But I am irritated that you ignore my case on Swowl.

First I need to know who out of e and iguana are scum. Your case doesn't help there.
My case actually implicates iguana and falls apart if e is scum.

1189
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 05, 2021, 01:16:05 am »
I get that you want to do a reread, MiX. But I am irritated that you ignore my case on Swowl.

1190
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 10:09:04 am »
I had an epiphany last night. I think I have solved the game. Massclaim right now is stupid and we shouldn#t do it; if you want to know who has what PR you can just read the thread.

Being in the same time zone as faust I read this as though he had the epiphany literally "last night" - i.e. this post happened at 6:45am Germany time, the light bulb switched on sometime after he quit posting the previous night, but during the day
That's correct; the epiphany was about MiX and Didds being Masons.

1191
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 10:06:41 am »
I maintain that I should receive townpoints on account of pointing out your flawed assignment of townpoints!

1192
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 10:04:04 am »
Also the only way this gives me town points at all is if you believe Swowl is town - and then I have to ask: Why?

It gives you town points because you processed the concept that swowl breadcrumbed during the day, rather than during the night looking for a NK target.
But I was very much aware of the breadcrumb during D2 already. That's why I said this:
The people on Swowl should just move away because that's a stupid wagon.
I even used the same wording as Swowl!

1193
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 10:00:14 am »
I say MiX and Didds get an opportunity for any final input (because one of them won't last the night), and we get the exile done.
But the other will and can just convey the final input that the dead Mason shared during the Night.

1194
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 09:59:04 am »
Also the only way this gives me town points at all is if you believe Swowl is town - and then I have to ask: Why?

1195
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 09:55:55 am »
The only town angle I could see for his play was trying to draw the nightkill, but he denied he was doing that.
I said exactly “I thought  I could draw the night kill”.
You said that about today, not D2.

Ok read this all back to me - where do i deny something?

After you mentioned it for the first time I went back searching for the post, and yes I can see how you thought it was a crumb, but it wasn’t intended that way.
Here you deny that you intended the EFHW posts as a crumb, but leaving a fake crumb in order to be nightkilled would be the only possible town motivation for what you did.

While we're at it, you can try to answer this: You say you reread EFHW N1 and changed your mind on her. What made you change your mind?

Another thing to note- scum!faust may have picked up on the whole breadcrumb thing and targeted swowl to be the NK N2 rather than EFHW. Town points for faust
Thanks I guess -  but I don't think scum!faust would have done this. The smarter play is to kill EFHW and block Swowl. Which is what I assumed happened until Swowl's claim.

1196
Weekly Design Contest / Re: Weekly Design Contest #130: Sidekicks
« on: October 04, 2021, 09:53:27 am »
Unpopular opinion time! I find it hard to design a card for this, because many of the existing cards just play better if they're not part of a split pile. The submissions so far reinforce that opinion for me.



This goes on top of Cobbler.  I love Cobbler and I want it to be better.  The Boot token would make it much better in most kingdoms. There is only one Boot Token, so the price reduction applies to everyone.  (Pretend the card says "Action-Duration" on the bottom.  Looks like I forgot that part)
I'm not sure this makes Cobbler better. Cobbler is an early-game card, and with this you can only gain it well into the midgame.



Here's my entry this week. 5 copies of Lockbox go on top of 5 copies of Treasurer. +Buy helps deplete the top half of the pile, and then once you get the Key from Treasurer, you can "unlock" your Lockboxes for an extra one-shot $3 each. Be careful though: your opponent can swipe Lockboxes from the trash for themselves, but they'll need to steal the Key from you too to activate them.
This makes the first option on Treasurer pretty useless, by buffing the other two and limiting Treasurer gains to the mid-late game, where trashing is less useful anyways. I also really don't think it's necessary to reward Key control more. The better design for this would be if the text that Lockbox has was on Key, and Key did nothing else, and the first Treasurer option was removed. But of course that doesn't fit the contest.



Quote
Scrying Bones - $2
Action
+2 Cards
+1 Action
+1 Coffers
Put 2 cards from your hand onto your deck.

A cheap Candlestick Maker variant that can set up Mystic and helps you find the Mystics. It is an even 5 and 5 split with Mystic. Not sure if the draw 2 cards then return 2 cards effect is equivalent to a +Buy, but pricing it at $3 does not seem very appealing, so I went with $2. This also goes great with a number of other cards that care what is on top of your deck. Feedback is appreciated.
Giving Mystic an inbuilt combo cheapens the experience I feel. Now you can't enjoy those times when there are other combos, and much of the deck-tracking rewards from Mystic are gone.



Goes on top of King's Court
This should probably have a ? in the top corners, as the $4 is conditional (see Charm). I'm not convinced that this is good enough for King's Court to be uncovered a signficant portion of the time. Even if it is, though, limiting to 5 King's Courts makes it likely that the person who wins the split has a massive advantage.

1197
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 09:34:34 am »
It seems that noone wants to talk to me. I shall need to talk to myself then.

I'm going on another premature quest to find the missing partner for an iguana/Swowl team. This time, we are going to focus on D1. All three candidates have been wagoned on D1, so that should be a well of information.

At the end of D1, Swowl is on joth and iguana is on mathdude. So right there that seems dangerous for scum - unless the third scum is Jimmmmm. It is worth pointing out that Swowl moved to joth more recently, bringing that wagon equal to mathdude's. That would be quite the bold bus. iguana on the other hand had been chilling out on the mathdude wagon for quite some time, it could well be that this was an early bus that iguana felt they couldn't get out of. It's also worth pointing out that neither Swowl nor iguana had joined the Jimmmmm wagon, and instead iguana was hanging out on the counter-wagon on EFHW at the time.

Overall rating for the third partner from this: Jimmmmm > mathdude > joth

Now let's check out D2 voting patterns. The most interesting crossroads for D2 was this vote count:

mathdude (3): EFHW, gkrieg13, jotheonah,
jotheonah (3): Swowl, MiX, WestCoastDidds
gkrieg13 (4): faust, iguanaiguana, Jimmmmm, mathdude
WestCoastDidds (1): 2.71828.....

Now, unless joth is scum, we have 2 scums on the gkrieg wagon here. Let's examine the 3 cases separately.

joth is scum: In that case, Swowl is bussing, and the 2 other scum try to push alternate wagons on town. Sensible enough. The pressure on joth wasn't huge I feel like, they wouldn't need a concentrated push.

mathdude is scum: That means we have a wagon with no scum on mathdude, and iguana/mathdude jumping the gkrieg wagon to get a good alternative. A bit clumsy maybe, but they certainly need to prevent the mathdude exile here.

Jimmmmm is scum: This makes the least amount of sense, though not by a large margin. There would be no reason for 2 scum to jump on a lurker exile because no scum is in any danger of being exiled. They could of course still do it if they feel it fits their play, but it's nothing big.

Overall, this does little to change my D1 reads, except maybe to make Jimmmm a little less likely scum.

Unfortunately, there is no clear picture from this on who the third partner is. Guess we're going to have to get into rereads and stuff. But that can wait until at least one of my scumreads is flipped.

1198
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 02:22:10 am »
The only town angle I could see for his play was trying to draw the nightkill, but he denied he was doing that.
I said exactly “I thought  I could draw the night kill”.
You said that about today, not D2.

Ok read this all back to me - where do i deny something?

After you mentioned it for the first time I went back searching for the post, and yes I can see how you thought it was a crumb, but it wasn’t intended that way.
Here you deny that you intended the EFHW posts as a crumb, but leaving a fake crumb in order to be nightkilled would be the only possible town motivation for what you did.

While we're at it, you can try to answer this: You say you reread EFHW N1 and changed your mind on her. What made you change your mind?

1199
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 04, 2021, 12:43:17 am »
The only town angle I could see for his play was trying to draw the nightkill, but he denied he was doing that.
I said exactly “I thought  I could draw the night kill”.
You said that about today, not D2.

1200
Mafia Game Threads / Re: M135: Among Us Mafia (Day 3)
« on: October 03, 2021, 04:31:54 pm »
The only town angle I could see for his play was trying to draw the nightkill, but he denied he was doing that.

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 955

Page created in 0.242 seconds with 18 queries.