Turn 3: CCSEE
Turn 4: CCCCE
Turn 5: CS *reshuffle* CEE
Everytime i open silver/silver it looks like that.
Trashing should be on there. Junking is listed twice.
I think one of those should be "trashing".
Unless you were trying to make a sort of "First Rule of Fight Club" type joke.
[snip]
Not sure if this is the best meme for the joke.
It's funny because you can't tell from a literal reading of the card's text whether this is what the card is supposed to do or not.
You'll have to use (gasp!) common sense!
Failing that, the rulebook makes it pretty clear.
The card text says "putting it on top of your deck", which implies you only ever gain a single card. It gives context that leads you to the correct interpretation.
[snip]
Not sure if this is the best meme for the joke.
It's funny because you can't tell from a literal reading of the card's text whether this is what the card is supposed to do or not.
You'll have to use (gasp!) common sense!
Failing that, the rulebook makes it pretty clear.
The card text says "putting it on top of your deck", which implies you only ever gain a single card. It gives context that leads you to the correct interpretation.
Does Familiar have a Raven?
Not sure if this is the best meme for the joke.
Whoa! I had not thought of this. Awesome.
I wonder if this will ever be a thing. I'm guessing not, because if you don't connect tactician to TR/KC, then it's a terrible place for the token.
It's funny because it might be more balanced than magpie!
Investment 5$ Action
Choose 1:
Take 2 coin tokens. Pay any number of coin tokens and gain as many Investment tokens as you paid.
Return all your Investment tokens to the supply. For every ten tokens you returned, gain a Steady Income and put it on top of your deck.
Steady Income 0$* Action-Duration
+1 card
+1 action
Now and at the start of each of your turns: Take a coin token.
This is not in the supply
Merge - Action $8
Trash an action card from your hand (or reveal a hand with no action cards in it). If you did, this card now has the text of that card appended to the end of it, and gains all types of that card.
So start the Really Bad Event Idea thread.
So... wait, it's always worth $4 then, right? That's ridiculously OP for $2, is this meant to be a joke?
The problem with all these examples is that in most real-life cases the context should make the meaning clear.
The very reason that the JFK & Stalin comic is biased towards the Oxford comma is because we know who JFK & Stalin are, which makes it a self-defeating argument.
With or without the Oxford comma the meaning is clear: the strippers are obviously a separate entity to JFK & Stalin.
If you are worrying about whether the presence or omission of an Oxford comma changes the meaning of a sentence, rewrite the damn sentence!
There are plenty of generic examples (where genuine confusion can arise even with context) that have ambiguity with the comma, ambiguity without the comma, or ambiguity either way. And yes, in most of those cases, there is a way to rewrite the sentence. That's certainly the best solution.
My pet peeve is just the people who uphold the Oxford comma as the be-all-end-all when it really isn't the case!
I'm assuming that you have to have to reveal Moat when the hag is played, and in that case you're protected during your turn. If a Moat enters your hand sometime later in your upcoming turn, then sorry - it's too late.
Lighthouse is in play when you buy something if and only if it was already in play when the Hag was played, so no issue there, I don't think.
I have no Lighthouse in play. You play Swamp Hag. On my turn, I play Lighthouse. Now Lighthouse is in play when I am buying something, but I will still gain a Curse because it wasn't in play when the Hag was played.
