He brings the Feast to life so that everyone can enjoy the free food!So then they take whoever cooked the meal to court, and THAT's how Feast gains a card.
But because Jumanji specifies that the card will antagonize all players, they all contract food poisoning.
Would that be ironic, or just hypocritical?It's kind of ironic that you're doing that yourself.
[Too lazy to actually make meme]Damn, I must have talked to this guy without remembering it, because Advisor was the only Guilds card I missed.
Advisor Art: "Psst... Advisor isn't a dominion card."
The main difference is Saboteur goes down at least $2, but sometimes down $3 or totally destroys a card. This goes up $2, or maybe $1 or even just gives you another copy of the same card.Right. With Saboteur, you're guaranteed to be giving them a worse card, if not nothing (3-piling aside for now). With this remodel variant, you might get the exact same card in the end. You're not guaranteed to be getting a better card.
Isn't Rebuild basically a reverse Saboteur?Well considering that you often go down to Duchy after Province is hit with a saboteur, I guess it is. Except it has an action. But then again, Saboteur can hit Rebuild. Rebuild can't give you more rebuilds.
One that only aims at the cards where Saboteur harms you the most, adds an action and can go up to 3$ more, but it's pretty much the same, just overpowered.
Reverses of cards don't always need to cost the same as the original. Think of swindler, that would be pretty horrible for you. It used to be a card but got taken out because it didn't work that well.But that makes sense. Generally, you buy the card you want most. It's not all that common that you want a card now but then would want to replace it with another card later. On the other hand, the difference between a card you wanted and a card you didn't want can be pretty huge (say Province-> Peddler or Fool's Gold->Estate).
Well, it could cost $4, it's not strictly better than Remodel (with Remodel you choose what card to trash, with this one it's the first one you reveal).
You see your turn 3 hand, and you're all set to get that nice juicy $5. BAM! Hit by an Urchin.
Also, when you try do to some crazy thing with Rats, being careful to constantly use your TFB cards on them. Then you reach turn 8 and notice that your Rats can't keep up with your TFB cards.
I've smuggled Rats because I was running out of them...
Inflammable means flammable? What a country!Does "in-" in "increase" count as a prefix? I can't think of any other words right now where "in-" is positive. Often "in-" is negative, meaning "not": insensitive, insecure. Slightly different, "in-" sometimes means something like "beyond": invaluable, incredible.Inflammable.
Insert obligatory Simpsons quote here.
The term Vanilla is also used among the Doom community to refer to the original Doom executables and things that can run on the original engine. There's also a source port called Chocolate Doom.Plenty of gaming communities use "Vanilla" to refer to an unmodified version of a game.
Super Street Fighter IV: Arcade Edition ver.2012 (haha the name is long, we know) is the tournament standard, and people refer to regular old Street Fighter IV as "vanilla SFIV." The Super Smash Bros. Brawl modding community refers to the unmodded game as "vBrawl", which is short for "vanilla Brawl".
Minecraft as well, as an example (I play minecraft a lot, so that's why I've heard of it before). And me and my friends have joked around that something that somehow has all mods installed is "chocolate".
53. StonemasonOn 4? Well, depends on how spammable the 2's you're getting are. But you know, those 5's can also be turned into the 2's you want to run out later. The 5's will probably be doing good work for you before then. You don't get a very large stonemason trashing tree with 2's. On the other hand, buying stonemason for 4 seems quite reasonable compared to buying it for 5 or 6, where the opportunity cost starts getting really large.
This may be the hardest card to rank. The play effect is probably down around Secret Chamber - often slightly useful but not worth a terminal, occasionally quite good. But the overpay is pretty tremendous. You would think it would best for 7 (i.e. overpaying by 5), and it does seem pretty good there, but the real power is... on 4, I think. The big point about this card is that it enables crazy 3-pile endings, almost from out of nowhere sometimes. And both effects work together on that.
Ah, That makes sense. I suppose it would be possible to store some count variable, since the size should only increase/decrease by 1 each time. That could lead to a whole bunch of tracking issues though. At any rate, it shouldn't matter much for room sizes of 50, but then is that the reason why the max size is 50 in the first place.Hold the phone! Can someone help me clear this up? Is $('.fs-player-list li') a Javascript array? It seems to me like that recalculating runs in O(N) time, since it apparently has to find the largest index key to determine the length.
My real question is, if it is an array, doesn't the O(N) updating of the length property get calculated whenever the size increases anyway, thereby resulting in O(N^2) time no no matter what you do? The post I quoted seems to suggest that not asking for the length property prevents this counting from happening. That doesn't sound right.
$('.fs-player-list li') traverses the DOM and returns an array containing all the elements matching the selector (ie, list items in the player list).
I'm pretty sure simply storing the count and incrementing/decrementing by 1 when someone enters/leaves would work, and would definitely be faster than recounting every time.
So, seeing this thread reminded me of something nutki said in one of the last messages I received from him...Hold the phone! Can someone help me clear this up? Is $('.fs-player-list li') a Javascript array? It seems to me like that recalculating runs in O(N) time, since it apparently has to find the largest index key to determine the length.(btw, because of this line goko code is already n^2)
> open Chrome
> go to playdominion.com
> open up the developer tools
> click on the sources tab
> open lib/FS.MeetingRoom.Dominion.js
> line 6018 is the start of a function, onPlayerListChange; this is called every time a player enters the lobby (and maybe leaves too?)
> line 6061: "var currentRomPlayers = $('.fs-player-list li').length,"
> this means the number of players in the current lobby is counted every time a player is added
> that counting is O(N), where N is the number of players
> simply displaying the the player list turns out to be O(N^2)
Perhaps this is the real issue?
But almond ice cream and coconut ice cream do tend to have vanilla flavouring added. Never tried the yogurt's thoughI dislike it mainly because I find the figurative use of "vanilla" as "standard" or "generic" annoying. Vanilla is a distinct and unique flavor.ah but in the world of ice cream and yogurt, vanilla provides the foundation or "base" as some might say for creating more flavors. So when you want to make fish flavored ice cream, you add fish to vanilla ice cream, just like adding fish to village turns it orange, gives it coins and takes away its cards...
Does fish ice cream really use vanilla ice cream as its base? I'd imagine they'd use plain ice cream or something more savory.
Also, since when does flavored yogurt begin with vanilla yogurt as a base? Maybe I'm just out of the loop since I haven't consumed animal products in many years, but that is certainly not the trend among coconut yogurt and almond yogurt.
Don't be silly. How is that more vanilla than the village whose shattered remains we see on Ruined village. The one we call "Walled".I am now starting a movement to call the Vanilla Village the Vanillage. Who's with me?
Which one? Worker's Village?
The original one, it's called the Vanilla Village sometimes, because it's the first.
I don't understand. Why should Plaza be called Vanillage?
Plaza has text instructions on it and therefore is not vanilla. Sudgy was talking about Bazaar.
Oh! I thought he was talking about the most Vanilla Village of them all, Ruined Village.
Yes it even includes adventure games and bot games. At first I though that was kind of silly, but then I figured that every game adds to a player's experience, whether the opponent was a bot or not. It would be more deceptive to see someone who played 100+ bot games appeared as someone with less than 10 games played on their profile.Maybe a dumb question, but why is the number of games so different from the number of games listed in the goko stats (when you click on avatars in the lobby)? Does the latter include casual or adventures or are some pro games excluded from these rankings?
The latter includes casual and adventures, plus games against bots.
That would do the trick. I didn't mean to pick the opposite direction as contraband and such. I'm just used to seeing "left" on the cards"Each player (including you) reveals a card from his hand. The player to his left chooses whether he discards the revealed card or trashes it."
Yes, it has the "The Romans befriended the Gauls, but they slew them" problem. So what, lern 2 context
This doesn't do what the card wants to do (wrong direction) and the context problem can be avoided. A legitimate solutions would be:
"Each player (including you) reveals a card from his hand and either trashes or discards it (the player to his right decides)."
