Imagine my excitement when I first heard about this tremendous opportunity to do the right thing... and the ensuing disappointment upon learning that Swindler was still there
On first read through, I missed Swindler still being in the game and I got up and cheered. I actually ran around the room excited that this terrible, swingy card was removed from the game. But then I saw it was still there.
Can we, uhm, get the official FAQ for Sauna/Avanto?
Will Sauna/Avanto ship with a FAQ, or will one be provided later, like with Summon?I haven't written a FAQ
It's not a fun feeling to look at a board and think "welp, looks like this is only a 7-card kingdom this game" because three shitty cards were thrown in.
It saddens me that so many people will still be playing with the removed cards just because. Removing the dud cards was more important for improving those sets than adding the new cards. If you play with all of them, you still have a bunch of almost-useless cards clogging up your Dominion games.
you can post mine if you want
I still think the simplest fix to Scout is making it cost $2.
I can make a one bit pixel image.
So I guess the big question is do you get both full sets out just the update packs. I'm leaning towards the full sets because I'm a nerd.
The real question is, do I go out and buy first edition Intrigue while I still can, or let the chance to own Scout slip forever through my fingers?
Buy it, don't unwrap it. Will be worth huge moneys.
Quick make scout jokes while you still can.
I don't think there's any danger of Brick becoming canon. But still, it combos with Ironmonger better than Rats does.
Anyone else considering buying the entire new editions just for the they pronoun cards, bold text +Whatever, and errata cards? maybe these are too few cards to be worth buying whole new sets for, but I could give away my old ones.
This title is really out of date, the current templating should be "Creature - Bugs".
Probably it's more moral to donate charity and not download the games illegally than it is to donate to charity and download the games illegally. So if you are trying to optimize your morality I guess you can't play games.
But unsurprisingly, not as useful as food. Having a bunch of fans who will then also illegally download your stuff, and no one who pays even the smallest bit, means you starve.
It would be cool to have everything crowdfunded. I wouldn't disagree with that. It couldn't work with everything, but I don't hate crowdfunding as an idea.
If nobody pays for it, there will be no product.
if everyone is a utilitarian who thinks the way that you do, why does anybody have to pay for anything?
...Who will then also download it illegally.
The argument itself was bogus, presenting only two options where more exist.
Why is it better for the developer? I would rather nobody use my product than someone use it and not pay for it.
But why don't you donate without illegally downloading all that stuff?
According to utilitarianism, it's better to illegally download stuff that you enjoy than not having that stuff at all.
Better for you, but better for the developer? Absolutely not. Utilitarianism is thinly veiled selfishness disguised as a legitimate ideology.
