6257
« on: January 12, 2013, 02:30:33 pm »
So I've gone through and re read the people I mentioned and during this re read, I've actually come to an interesting conclusion.
First off I went through and read the whole cuzz ordeal. I do find cuzz reacted overly defensive and I did find his deflection scummy. The thing is this is only a feeling and an opinion not concrete evidence. I won't cast my vote for him as of now because my only reasons are these. I understand an overly defensive response seems scummy, but I can totally understand flustered town responding the same way. As far as the deflection goes that was veery scummy but think about this. Is anyone talking about Lall as a reason to lynch glooble anymore, everyone dropped it once glooble pointed out cuzz was the first to bring it up. Just because it was a scummy deflection doesn't make the Lall case for glooble any less strong. My read through of cuzz has brought me too the conlcusion that hes scummy but i find nothing concrete enough for a vote, and I still see glooble as a viable lynch, nothing he has posted since his return has been something I wouldn't see scum doing.
Next my read through of Robz. I mainly did this because his outburst at cuzz for responding before I did was a bit jarring. At first I found this to be scummy, if the argument is there for why I'm not scum I don't see how cuzz bringing it up is really that terrible. But then I thought back to ZMIX, this tactic of baiting people into a scumslip is what he did there as well just in a different way. I find this to be town!robz main scumhunting tactic and although I find it a very poor one, it is very town!robz.
After rereading theorel, still nothing jumps out as scummy or towny, very much a null read to me.
Upon rereading shraeye I've found I support him very strongly for his opinion on Jimm. Looking at posts 520, 832, and 833. First off as far as overly defensive responses I feel Jimm's is just that. Also I find it very scummy that Jim says shraeye just summarized the case on jim and tried to make it seem as scummy as possible. This is exactly what Jim has been doing all game and why I have found him scummy in the past. Next I don't agree with Jim's defense at all. Look at the opening post of 832, Jim says shraeye is focusing too much on the case made against him and not on what hes actually said. Then he says we should look at things closer as theorel and dsell have. He follows this by quoting how theorel and dsell "understand" where hes coming from. Where do dsell and theorel look at things closer? Simply because they support you they have a better "understanding" of the whole case? I think shraeye has provided much support for how you have been acting scummy all game and points to other people who have made cases against you as well. This looks like a much closer look into you then simply understanding how you came to the conclusion you did. Jim also seems to attack shraeye for attacking cuzz which I don't find helpfull to town at all. All Jim is doing there is making shraeye look less credible in other arguments to make the argument he makes against Jim less credible. Defend yourself, don't attack the person attacking you. Vote: Jimm
don't wanna lurk hard and not give the newbies a good game
