26
Rules Questions / gain prohibition with Knights
« on: November 11, 2013, 10:38:39 am »
There has been plenty of discussion (mostly on the Variants and Fan Cards subforum) on why prohibitting gaining is a bad idea. Clashing of rules occur when one card says "Gain a Duchy" and another says "Duchies cannot be Gained".
However, the rules seem to state that all Knights are in the supply but only the top-one can be gained. So, what happens if I Upgrade or Remake a $4 cost and there are no other $5 costs in the supply and Sir Martin is the top Knight? The card is telling me to do something (gain a $5 from the Supply) and there are $5s in the supply, but the DA rules tell me those $5s cannot be gained. Moreover, I assume as usual that rules on cards take priority over rules on the rulebook, but I am also pretty sure that the intended behavior is that you do not gain Knights not on top. Same thing if Sir Martin is not on top and something makes you gain him (like Upgrading a $3 and there are no other $4s in the supply).
This I think is a small loophole in the rules, but also, it shows that prohibiting gaining is confusing, but not the worse idea ever.
However, the rules seem to state that all Knights are in the supply but only the top-one can be gained. So, what happens if I Upgrade or Remake a $4 cost and there are no other $5 costs in the supply and Sir Martin is the top Knight? The card is telling me to do something (gain a $5 from the Supply) and there are $5s in the supply, but the DA rules tell me those $5s cannot be gained. Moreover, I assume as usual that rules on cards take priority over rules on the rulebook, but I am also pretty sure that the intended behavior is that you do not gain Knights not on top. Same thing if Sir Martin is not on top and something makes you gain him (like Upgrading a $3 and there are no other $4s in the supply).
This I think is a small loophole in the rules, but also, it shows that prohibiting gaining is confusing, but not the worse idea ever.