51
Hearthstone / Re: Constructed General Discussion
« on: February 27, 2016, 02:39:36 pm »
So, you would play FoN just for 6 damage spread across as you want?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
52
Hearthstone / Re: Hearthstone Noob
« on: February 27, 2016, 12:35:39 pm »
You have it the other way around too (if you get to X level in HotS, you get a HotS cardback).
53
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 9]
« on: February 27, 2016, 08:29:07 am »
Also for same reason Me + Tables is very possibly a liberal team (one of us at least).
54
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 9]
« on: February 27, 2016, 08:28:12 am »
I still think it is bad line of thinking, but w/e.
I'd approve Tables chancellor 100%. It is pretty obvious he is not Hitler. Unless you think this exact composition is 3 fascists + Hitler:
Grujah, Tables, faust, and ghost
you should see it too. 4 fascist votes + me - who suggested the candidacy - would elect a Hitler easily.
I do not think I can vote yes on Hydrad, tho.
I'd approve Tables chancellor 100%. It is pretty obvious he is not Hitler. Unless you think this exact composition is 3 fascists + Hitler:
Grujah, Tables, faust, and ghost
you should see it too. 4 fascist votes + me - who suggested the candidacy - would elect a Hitler easily.
I do not think I can vote yes on Hydrad, tho.
55
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 9]
« on: February 27, 2016, 05:46:08 am »Okay, so nein votes... Egor, gkrieg are obvious. Hydrad... maybe hoping to become Chancellor himself? Why did you vote this down, Hydrad?
because the options for me seem to be either gkrieg/tables or gkrieg/me
Both of which I like more then grujah/tables.
I still believe that choose the "best of three" is bad. By that logic, now I (and also Tables and faust and ghost) need to shoot down gkrieg goverment cuz that is not my first choice.
56
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 9]
« on: February 27, 2016, 05:43:09 am »Interesting result. I can understand people voting it down. Arch and Egor were basically auto no's, Gkrieg as well maybe, that leaves Hydrad and ADK who didn't trust it. That's fair enough. I'm more interested in why Ghost voted it up actually.
Kinda proves me to me that you are not Hitler, and are very very likely to be liberal. Also makes faust very very likely liberal as well.
You guys are the ones I trust the most now.
57
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 26, 2016, 05:11:35 pm »
So, vote yes? 
58
General Discussion / Re: [Crowdsourcing] Need help Googling a song
« on: February 26, 2016, 06:22:25 am »
/r/tipofmytongue is subreddit that is committed to solving finding songs, games, videos, whatevers that you can't remmember exactly, and it is pretty awesome.
59
Hearthstone / Re: Constructed General Discussion
« on: February 26, 2016, 05:56:34 am »
Both, ez. I come from magic, juggling ONLY 2 formats is a piece of cake.
60
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 25, 2016, 09:06:55 pm »
I nominate Tables.
61
General Discussion / Re: Movies: Any movie buffs?
« on: February 25, 2016, 09:05:36 pm »Also Christian Bale s pretty awful and the camerawork is all over the place. I like the film fine overall, but it's my least favorite of the ones I've seen so far.
I agree that Bale wasn't good.
But man, I just don't get it. Ok, maybe it has to do with the fact that I don't live in USA, use 100% cash only and have almost never even been in a bank. I don't really know what a bond is. And yes, they did too much of the explaining, yet, I still dont get it completely. It's just completely nowhere near my alley.
62
Hearthstone / Re: Constructed General Discussion
« on: February 25, 2016, 04:57:00 pm »
So you have Keeper, Avenge, Coin, Minibot, and muster. How do you play it out?
63
Hearthstone / Re: Tavern Brawl Discussion
« on: February 25, 2016, 04:25:58 pm »
You can play Molten/Shadowstep/Panda combo,
or what I did, windfury Shaman. Dust Devil and Dunemaul Shaman both become great, Dunemaul can even evade taunt.
or what I did, windfury Shaman. Dust Devil and Dunemaul Shaman both become great, Dunemaul can even evade taunt.
64
Hearthstone / Re: Constructed General Discussion
« on: February 25, 2016, 04:24:43 pm »
If it is avenge and you can follow up with Minibot, I don't see why not. Also if opponent draws keeper you dont buff it.
65
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 25, 2016, 04:14:25 pm »@ghost - faust is pretty much high on facist list for you, and Tables very low on Hitler list. Did you take in cosideration that faust wants Tables chancellor so he choice me?...would Tables fake a liberal result on me? Does he not need all the liberal cred he can get, and would get that from outing me as fascist?
True this. Esp as he was somewhat suspected due to Egor situation. I mean, I see some way in which he could clear you, but probably not likely.
I have in my head some convulted way why Tables puts himself into Egor situation: He does so, Egor recognizes it, does incriminates himself in another way, we believe Tables is a good lib. Not very likely, I admit.
I'll name my chancellor before I go to sleep (it is 10PM now), so if anybody want to chime in, feel free.
66
General Discussion / Re: Movies: Any movie buffs?
« on: February 25, 2016, 03:35:02 pm »For the record, Avatar didn't win, it was the favorite but got beaten by The Hurt Locker.
LOTR did win, but it took three tries, I don't see MM:FR doing it, specifically because it didn't win any of the industry awards (as opposed to critics awards). It seems to be between Spotlight, The Big Short and The Revenant. The latter just came out here, not sure I'll be able to see it before Sunday, but between the other two I'm very much rooting for Spotlight.
I don't reeeeeally think MM:FR can take it, I just love the movie too much to completely disregard that option.
Spotlight taking it I would support. It would be second one in a row to have Keaton starring (Reventant would be second one in row by same director). Interesting in both cases
.
67
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 25, 2016, 02:36:20 pm »
As for my "Hydrad is the lowest", for sure he is to me lower than gkrieg who gave me serious Hitler vibes at start, when he was so liberalish. If Faust or ADK were fascist they stuck me more likely to be regular ones, that's how I got there.
68
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 25, 2016, 02:33:44 pm »
@ghost - faust is pretty much high on facist list for you, and Tables very low on Hitler list. Did you take in cosideration that faust wants Tables chancellor so he choice me?
69
General Discussion / Re: Movies: Any movie buffs?
« on: February 25, 2016, 01:33:01 pm »
I like the Oscars, I don't swear but it, but you mostly know what the Award entitles, so when you watch an "Oscar nominated/winning movie" you know what you are getting yourself into most of the time.
Now, from the Best Movie nominees, I saw Mad Max, Room, Spotlight and The Big Short, (all except Max in last 3 days) and will try to squeeze in a one or two more till sunday.
Now, Big Short actually disappointed me. The whole movie is so confusing and disjointed, and it doesn't really go anywhere. It's basically 3 stories that are not connected in any way except that all 3 of them deal with shorting the stocks. Narative is also all over the place, it is interjected by these wierd slidehows, by characters breaking 3rd wall, and this explanations of the whole shebang, CDOs, AAA properties, etc. And that is the worst part, I think they've tried to explain the whole deal to me like 5 times all together, and the whole time I was still struggling to get it, and by the end I both still didn't understnad most of it, and didn't care at all.
Steve Carrell is fucking great and that is about the only good thing I can say. Bale getting the nomination and not him is an error for sure.
Spotlight is pretty good. My main "problem" (even tho it's not really a problem) is that is is just so un-kinematographic (it lacks things like character progression and flow that you usually expect of the movies) that if feels more like a documentary. Subject is very touchy and I don't think that being non-explicit was bad, I feel that showing the victims and showing the range of emotions that main characters (reporters) go through the movie has nailed how the viewer feels as well, at that was great. It had some really strong scenes, my favouirte ones are when A guy "leans" on Robby in a bar (near the end) and Robby is completely in disbelief, realzing how this whole thing escalated as much as it did and When he argues how they are as responsible as the lawyers, as nobody noticed, especially him who had the list years ago in his desk.. Also Ruffalo is surprisingly good.
The Room was a big surprise. I actually expected a it to be much more light and more of a standard "bestseller adaptation" (like Girl with Dragon Tattoo and the like), but it hit hard. It takes a while to realize what exactly is going on and the movie makes a good use of that time, also both Mom's and Jack's mental state after they get out is, I believe, done so believable, as well as the reaction of the people/family. It's a great movie, and a emotional rollercoaster for sure.
Now, Mad Max. I saw it 3-4 times for sure. I love the movie. The world that George Miller made is superb. Every small detail of it, he nails. The technologies, the lingo, the society, every single thing I was amazed by. I already spoke of the movie before, I am not going to. I am not sure that this can win it (But LOTR and Avatar did it), but I secretly hope so. Spotlight or Room taking it, I don't mind either.
Now, from the Best Movie nominees, I saw Mad Max, Room, Spotlight and The Big Short, (all except Max in last 3 days) and will try to squeeze in a one or two more till sunday.
Now, Big Short actually disappointed me. The whole movie is so confusing and disjointed, and it doesn't really go anywhere. It's basically 3 stories that are not connected in any way except that all 3 of them deal with shorting the stocks. Narative is also all over the place, it is interjected by these wierd slidehows, by characters breaking 3rd wall, and this explanations of the whole shebang, CDOs, AAA properties, etc. And that is the worst part, I think they've tried to explain the whole deal to me like 5 times all together, and the whole time I was still struggling to get it, and by the end I both still didn't understnad most of it, and didn't care at all.
Steve Carrell is fucking great and that is about the only good thing I can say. Bale getting the nomination and not him is an error for sure.
Spotlight is pretty good. My main "problem" (even tho it's not really a problem) is that is is just so un-kinematographic (it lacks things like character progression and flow that you usually expect of the movies) that if feels more like a documentary. Subject is very touchy and I don't think that being non-explicit was bad, I feel that showing the victims and showing the range of emotions that main characters (reporters) go through the movie has nailed how the viewer feels as well, at that was great. It had some really strong scenes, my favouirte ones are when A guy "leans" on Robby in a bar (near the end) and Robby is completely in disbelief, realzing how this whole thing escalated as much as it did and When he argues how they are as responsible as the lawyers, as nobody noticed, especially him who had the list years ago in his desk.. Also Ruffalo is surprisingly good.
The Room was a big surprise. I actually expected a it to be much more light and more of a standard "bestseller adaptation" (like Girl with Dragon Tattoo and the like), but it hit hard. It takes a while to realize what exactly is going on and the movie makes a good use of that time, also both Mom's and Jack's mental state after they get out is, I believe, done so believable, as well as the reaction of the people/family. It's a great movie, and a emotional rollercoaster for sure.
Now, Mad Max. I saw it 3-4 times for sure. I love the movie. The world that George Miller made is superb. Every small detail of it, he nails. The technologies, the lingo, the society, every single thing I was amazed by. I already spoke of the movie before, I am not going to. I am not sure that this can win it (But LOTR and Avatar did it), but I secretly hope so.
Spotlight or Room taking it, I don't mind either.70
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 24, 2016, 07:26:32 pm »
I seriously just remembered that you guys passed a L and it completely didn't cross my mind that it was LLL. It is dumb, but really that's the whole story.
71
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 24, 2016, 06:24:11 pm »Arcetype has posted literally nothing for like half of the game. How should we be able to trust him?
This x100.
72
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 24, 2016, 02:57:35 pm »Great.
Now, I know I said I'd choose Tables, but I have to consider the option that you are fascist and choose me exactly cuz I said I'd choose Tables. So, give me some times do decide.
Out of me, Arch and Tables I like Tables the least. I like myself most (I am liberal) Arch next (if he is liberal, which is likely, it will clear me as well)
I would assume you don't like tables at all, as he is confirmed fascist to you. I am not considering you or Arch at all. I might choose Hydrad, he seems like least likely to be H out of 4 people "on train". Him or Tables, I need to read stuff.
73
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 24, 2016, 08:43:04 am »
Great.
Now, I know I said I'd choose Tables, but I have to consider the option that you are fascist and choose me exactly cuz I said I'd choose Tables. So, give me some times do decide.
Now, I know I said I'd choose Tables, but I have to consider the option that you are fascist and choose me exactly cuz I said I'd choose Tables. So, give me some times do decide.
74
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 23, 2016, 06:06:36 pm »
Ugh, I actually didn't factor that, damn.
Good point, doesn't say much about faust. He could have been forced to play an L and could have been forced to pass FF (or he could have chosen so), certanly none of those action were actually liberal.
Same goes for you, I guess... if you drew LLL and got passed FF, you didn't have much choice.
Good point, doesn't say much about faust. He could have been forced to play an L and could have been forced to pass FF (or he could have chosen so), certanly none of those action were actually liberal.
Same goes for you, I guess... if you drew LLL and got passed FF, you didn't have much choice.
75
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Secret Hitler I [Round 8S]
« on: February 23, 2016, 04:28:05 pm »
@ADK IIRC, I voted no the first time around as I didn't consider faust clear just because Tables cleared him, as I though Tables was more likely to be F than Arch/Egor at the time. Second time I voted yes as you already enacted a L policy in the meantime.
@faust.
Nominate: I would nominate Tables. I find him less likely to be F than Arch/Egor, and less likely to be H than buys on train.
Kill: If I draw FFF, Arch or Egor, I don't care. I think it is better to kill a very likely F than to try to shoot a H and get a Liberal, as fascist have a majority in that case.
If I send FL to Tables and he choses F, of course, that changes a lot.
@faust.
Nominate: I would nominate Tables. I find him less likely to be F than Arch/Egor, and less likely to be H than buys on train.
Kill: If I draw FFF, Arch or Egor, I don't care. I think it is better to kill a very likely F than to try to shoot a H and get a Liberal, as fascist have a majority in that case.
If I send FL to Tables and he choses F, of course, that changes a lot.