I assume the main argument against using the term "village" is ambiguity between this term and the Village card.'
I suggest we should increase the frustration and call all the villages "walled villages".
Brain Sparks is one of the best modern memes. It's sad that people are starting to switch to Unfaithful Boyfriend.
Mega-confirmed. Apparently there's some enormous incentive not to make new types of trays.
for each set that can use the same tray.
I had a dream the other night that it had already been released, does that count?
Can you tell us what the cards were?
Inheriting Great Hall or Scout is totally amazing.
You can’t Inherit Great Hall.
I believe I'm right in saying that called cards are also in play. That's a potentially important consideration when Peddler is in the kingdom.Quote from: DOMINION (2nd Ed) rules page 7"In play" - Being in a player's play area.
• Cards become "in play" when played, and usually stay there until discarded from play in Clean-up.
• Only played cards are in play; set aside cards, cards in the trash, in the Supply, in hands, etc., are not in play.
Writing the above has caused something to occur to me. Consider a scenario in which you have two buys and a Duplicate on the Tavern mat. After your first buy, you call the Duplicate to get a second copy of the gained card. Presumably that causes the price of Peddler to drop by 2 between the first and second buys.
(usually), and then you can spend that . Cards don't get spent. I'm not actually sure of your intention, but if I'm guessing right, then what you want here is a reserve card, similar to Coin Of The Realm (and the name should be changed because Reserve is a card type).
:
.
... this gives a coin token instead of , AND gives a ... all for a cost increase from to 
. Also, the trashing is optional, not mandatory, so it's safer than Junk Dealer. if you trash a card. So you can't just build a deck with a bunch of these; soon you'll be down to just 1 card... and 1 VP per turn isn't great. But when combined with something like King's Court, you could build something better.
Sauna with autobuy is pretty terrible online as well; say you have a Sauna in play, two Silvers and three Coppers in hand and click on a Gold to buy it. After a Silver is automatically played, you will get to trash a Copper and even though you still have enough $ in hand to buy the Gold, you will not automatically play the rest of your treasures and will not get the Gold. You're now stuck with just a Silver in play, unable to play any treasures barring an undo.
I think "up to 4" Pretty clearly includes 0,1,2,3,4. I thought that from day one of playing dominion. (Although admittedly it really didn't ever matter to me until I'd already played lots of dominion)
It might as well say "Trash fewer than 5 cards"
Hello again.
I am there also. Same username as here. Feel free to send a friend request and/or game invites if you remember me. Thanks Watno for reminding me this place exists!
You very rarely play a Chapel to trash zero cards.Hmm. I must be strange. I've many times played a Chapel to cost-reduce Peddler. I've also Princed a Chapel to good effect in a Mountebank game.
I've also owned Chapels in a game with Herald, though I don't recall if I was ever forced to play Chapel then chose not to trash anything.
It seems to crop up surprisingly often.
I notice the new Dame Anna says "You may trash up to 2 cards from your hand." Is this a mistake or was it left for clarity?I have no memory of this case and probably just didn't consider it.
I think I suggested it. And it's purposefully inconsistent. You often play Dame Anna without wanting to trash your cards, so the question comes up constantly. You very rarely play a Chapel to trash zero cards.
GendoIkari is making fun of Kuildeous' outrage about inaccurate use of words by jokingly referring to two other popular cases of inaccurate word use: One is the use of "literally" in its opposite meaning of figuratively - originally an ironic use that has become so commonplace that people think it's how it is meant to be used -, and the unclarity of "next [weekday]", which is used by some to mean "the next time that particular day comes around" and by others as "this day in the week after the current one".Yeah, this problem is literally the worst thing that has happened to me. I hope I don't have to deal with it before next Friday.
This post got more upvotes than I would have expected. Am I missing anything?
It's worth noting that errata is always bad. It's sometimes a necessary evil, because it's not as bad as the alternative. In a CCG, the alternative is having everybody playing the same dominant deck. That's very bad. In Dominion, the alternative is having some games with these cards being less fun than most games without them. That's bad, but not as bad as having errata.
EDIT: And, well, Dominion has done errata, mostly in the form of the second editions removing weak cards and adding better ones. And Possession has had significant errata to make it not awful with Debt tokens.
Excellent, thank you.
In my Antiquities Fanspansion, I have an altVP with "Trash to gain VPs" and didn't want it to be King's Court + altVP = 5 billion points.
Meh. People are always freaking out over cards being strong with King's Court. Cards are strong with King's Court. That's what King's Court does. Like Possession and Fortress, you should usually ignore if something feels overpowered with that card, unless it's downright broken (which admittedly is a matter of perception, but I wouldn't call +4 more VP broken).
Either way, have you compared your card to Distand Lands yet?
I notice the new Dame Anna says "You may trash up to 2 cards from your hand." Is this a mistake or was it left for clarity?
