1
Weekly Design Contest / Re: Weekly Design Contest Thread
« on: August 06, 2020, 08:04:28 am »My first entry in this contest.
Designed to encourage Action chaining. In some way, a different, though optional Bandit Fort.
I am still unsure about it's price, might be to cheap.
Any feedback is always welcome.
I really like it, but I do have to say it ends up being an expensive Duchy if there is no trashing available.
That problem could be solved when Mountain is a trasher itself, e.g. when gained. This needs an extra dividing line, but I think you don't need the existing one. I also think you can skip the "but not less than 0 VP". If someone accumulates Treasures and goes for Mountains, then they are doomed anyway (Mountain of Doom).
So, my suggestions:QuoteWorth 10 VP, less 1 VP for each treasure in your deck.
--------------------------------------
When you gain this, you may trash a card from your hand.
Some other possibilities for on-gain trashing:QuoteWhen you gain this, choose one, trash a card from your hand; or each other player gains a Silver.QuoteWhen you gain this, trash a card from your hand and each other player gains a Silver.QuoteWhen you gain this, you may trash any treasure from your hand.The cost of the card should be accordingly adjusted (whatever that means).
Thank you for your feedback. You've got some very good points. And you are absolutly right, it didn't need the dividing line in its first form.
Mountain of Doom would be fun, but I see it very problematic with swindler. That in it self could be fixed by lowering/increasing its price, but I don't really want to increase its price any further.
I kept the updated version as simple as possible, but I really liked this suggestions:
Quote
When you gain this, trash a card from your hand and each other player gains a Silver.
Here is my updated entry - Mountain:
