I don't have time right now to post much, and I'm going to be busy this weekend, so sorry in advance if I don't say much.
I doubt both remaining scum were on the IDP wagon: I'd guess either there's one on and one off or both off. So looking most closely at those who were off is a good idea (for today, at least). That means Cuzz, schadd, e, TWM, and mcmcsalot.
I've been getting townie vibes from TWM and I was for mcmcsalot too, at least earlier (I probably need to reread D1 though), so I'd rather look at the others first.
Cuzz looks a bit suspicious, as other have pointed out, but he already has three votes on him.
e wasn't really on much toward the end of D1. He only voted for schadd during D1, at that without real explanation. I'm not really
suspicious of him, but I'm not really townreading him either.
schadd had a single vote on QS all of D1, never changing it. He was present for the wagon, and, well, there's this post shortly before Dylan hammered:
yeah intent
i kind of want to be not voting him because i think he will flip town and then people will observe "hey, schadd wasn't voting for that guy who was town" though
It just seems weird to me. Like, if he's town, he's saying he'll push the lynch through on someone he mistakenly thinks is town, while also thinking about how he'll look afterward. But if he's scum, he's trying to make it look like he's town by being wrong about the upcoming flip and expressing willingness to lynch someone who will be revealed as scum, while also avoiding actually voting for his partner. I'm mostly just confused by him right now.
vote: schaddI feel like I shouldn't just ignore the people who were on the wagon, but I'm too tired to look at them right now.
Anyway, on another topic:
Yes. I apologize. I had missed that rule. I should have written them in a PM to myself instead.
No, you shouldn't have done that at all. That's exactly what the rule is designed to prevent.
Wait, there's a rule against composing and storing a post in a place only you have access to and posting it later? Because that's what it looks like Awaclus is saying here. I thought that rule was designed to prevent proving the role/alignment the mod gave you or proving in-game communication with other people based on exact wording or something similar.
