1
GokoDom / Re: GokoDom III: Third Theason Thign-up Thread
« on: January 31, 2014, 07:51:21 pm »
I'm in. All sets.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Filter to certain boards:
Pages: [1]
Pages: [1]
2
Dominion General Discussion / Re: Hypothetical Treasure Chest Expansion Composition
« on: April 25, 2013, 08:02:59 pm »It's Donald's game, so the composition is his and his decision alone. However, I will say that a Treasure Chest set would be a great way to end Dominion with a bang. I would love to get another Duration, potion cost card, vp token card, and of course card that hands out ruins. So, that would be cool to get more cards like that. I really do hope Donald X. does decide to do this at some point.
It would be really awesome if the Treasure Chest expansion came in an actual treasure chest. With souped up tokens (like silver for 1s and Gold for 5s. I always found it annoying that they were not different colors when I counted them up IRL). More elegant and functional matts (perhaps puzzle pieces that somehow fit together???). MORE POTION CARDS (because thats really what you need right now, more potion cards), ruins, you know throw all the "extra" stuff in there. And then put it all in a swanky carry-along chest.
3
Dominion: Dark Ages Previews / Re: Dark Ages Preview #4: Rats, Pillage, Spoils
« on: August 09, 2012, 10:33:37 am »I am wondering what the iteractionn of Rats is with Lookout. Lookout says "+1 Action, Look at the topI am not understanding what you mean there, but if it helps, you do things in the order the card tells you to. So trash, then discard, then place.
3 cards of your deck. Trash one of them. Discard one of them. Put the other one on top of your deck."
Because of the "look at" function there is no accountability on what you do first: trash, discard, place.
Is there supposed to be an order to those three? If not I guess Lookout + Rats in one of the 3 top cards
would make Lookout function as a cantrip with you actually getting the card you place on top.
I guess what I'm saying is is that if you have to trash first, because Lookout is "look at" and not "reveal," there is no accountability on what that second card was meaning that if you trashed the Rats and got a +1 card, there is nothing but honesty stopping the player from just picking the better of the next two cards to draw immediately. Because of that inherent problem I feel like the trash, discard, and place on top must either be simulataneous or player's choice.
4
Dominion: Dark Ages Previews / Re: Dark Ages Preview #4: Rats, Pillage, Spoils
« on: August 09, 2012, 10:27:46 am »
I am wondering what the iteractionn of Rats is with Lookout. Lookout says "+1 Action, Look at the top
3 cards of your deck. Trash one of them. Discard one of them. Put the other one on top of your deck."
Because of the "look at" function there is no accountability on what you do first: trash, discard, place.
Is there supposed to be an order to those three? If not I guess Lookout + Rats in one of the 3 top cards
would make Lookout function as a cantrip with you actually getting the card you place on top.
3 cards of your deck. Trash one of them. Discard one of them. Put the other one on top of your deck."
Because of the "look at" function there is no accountability on what you do first: trash, discard, place.
Is there supposed to be an order to those three? If not I guess Lookout + Rats in one of the 3 top cards
would make Lookout function as a cantrip with you actually getting the card you place on top.
Pages: [1]