1
Feedback / Re: F.DS could benefit from a clean up
« on: February 02, 2022, 05:40:51 pm »
Too bad it was only 4 boards, 2 more and you'd get Monument (I'd argue they weren't melded but tucked)
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Feedback / Re: F.DS could benefit from a clean up
« on: January 27, 2022, 02:10:28 pm »
The Innovation forums seem to be completely gone? That's a bit too harsh i think
3
General Discussion / Re: Maths thread.
« on: February 22, 2021, 05:43:40 pm »f ∈ O(n^2)
If you write this, it's a shorthand for f ∈ O(g) where g : n ↦ n^2. But f(x) ∈ O(g(x)) is nonsensical because f(x) isn't a thing. f is a function; f(5) is a number, "f(x) = 3x" is a shorthand for f = {... (-1, -3), (0,0), (1,3), ...}. But f(x) itself is literally not anything.
What makes it acceptable to use n^2 as a shorthand for n -> n^2, but not f(x) as a shorthand for x -> f(x)?
4
General Discussion / Re: Petty Complaints
« on: February 22, 2021, 04:02:07 pm »To prevent you from trying to find a nonexistent explanation, I'm complaining about how the statement is written
I assume your complaint is about '=' being used for something that it is not an equivalence relation?
not primarily. that's bad, too, but writing f(x) rather than f is worse.
So what would your preferred way of writing f(n) = O(n^2) be?
5
General Discussion / Re: Petty Complaints
« on: February 22, 2021, 03:21:58 pm »To prevent you from trying to find a nonexistent explanation, I'm complaining about how the statement is written
I assume your complaint is about '=' being used for something that it is not an equivalence relation?
7
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: April 03, 2020, 12:39:32 pm »
Our guesses:
Yours are al correct, so you probably won.
- Horizon
- Canal
- Bond
- Car
Yours are al correct, so you probably won.
8
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: April 02, 2020, 02:43:03 pm »
1-2-3 is correct for ours.
That means we need to guess the other teams words now, unless I'm mistaken.
That means we need to guess the other teams words now, unless I'm mistaken.
10
Dominion General Discussion / Re: I think I can't play Dominion with my sets?!
« on: March 21, 2020, 07:22:20 am »
Guilds is a small expansion, so I wouldn't recommend that for now. I think seaside is a good option when you want something interesting but not complicated.
11
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: March 20, 2020, 05:54:21 am »
Guessing 2-4-1 for yours
12
Dominion General Discussion / Re: Menagerie Bonus Previews
« on: March 17, 2020, 06:38:37 am »I assume that's the cause of the desperation.Bonus Preview 11: Desperation
It's the Event version of Cursed Gold. You can have more money, if you want it badly enough.
Is the person on the art missing a hand?
13
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: March 15, 2020, 01:35:16 pm »
ghostofmars and bitwise to give the next set of clues unless I'm mistaken
14
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 29, 2020, 04:09:50 am »Waiting for Jimmmmm, right?
15
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 24, 2020, 01:48:41 pm »Our guess for our clue is 4-1-24-1-2 is correct.
Our guess for your clue is 3-1-4
16
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 22, 2020, 06:46:40 am »
Doctor - Shade - Air
17
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 22, 2020, 05:57:36 am »
Well, that explains why it's taking so long 
18
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 21, 2020, 02:12:25 am »
Waiting for Jimmmmm, right?
19
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 14, 2020, 11:26:52 am »
guess for ours: 3-1-4
20
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 13, 2020, 12:37:21 pm »
Guess for yours: 3-2-4
21
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 11, 2020, 02:33:38 am »
My team guesses 1-2-4, which is correct.
Our guess for your clue is 2-4-3
Our guess for your clue is 2-4-3
22
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 09, 2020, 07:49:51 am »
Fire - Water - Ice
23
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 03, 2020, 02:08:22 pm »So we can debate the numbers without giving the reasons?
"I like 2-3-1"
"I think 2-4-1 is better"
Seems like it'd be challenging to settle on one, but I get the purpose, sure.
Giving the reason is fine, unless the reason indicates a clue you are going to give later.
24
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto 2
« on: February 01, 2020, 04:00:05 am »
Yeah, I think just don't talk about strategy. Also nothing along the lines of "he woul have said "x" instead of "y" if he meant that about your own teams clue.
25
Non-Mafia Game Threads / Re: Decrypto
« on: January 29, 2020, 12:47:52 pm »
Congratulations.
I guess I overthought the last clue. I thought you wouldn't really ski at a cliff.
I'd be up for another, and we had 2 more people interested as well.
Go for a game with 6?
I guess I overthought the last clue. I thought you wouldn't really ski at a cliff.
I'd be up for another, and we had 2 more people interested as well.
Go for a game with 6?