Dominion Strategy Forum
Dominion => Rules Questions => Topic started by: mattmillburn on June 22, 2015, 01:00:06 am
-
The basic rules state that when you play an action, you put the card face up in the play area. When you play a treasure, you also put the card in the play area. Do the cards played in the play area need to be visible to the other players or can your play area be hidden from others? Also, when you play a treasure to buy a card are you required to allow other players to see your treasures? Or can you just buy your card and put your treasures into the discard pile?
-
The basic rules state that when you play an action, you put the card face up in the play area. When you play a treasure, you also put the card in the play area. Do the cards played in the play area need to be visible to the other players or can your play area be hidden from others? Also, when you play a treasure to buy a card are you required to allow other players to see your treasures? Or can you just buy your card and put your treasures into the discard pile?
If your play area is not visible to other players, try proving you're not playing cards you don't have. You need it to be visible. You have to show your treasures via playing them, or else you could buy 10000 Provinces and put the burden of proof into the trash can.
-
The rules state that your "play area" is the area nearest to you on the table.
Actions and treasures are played face-up in your play area.
It is an impressive act of mental gymnastics to see a rule that tells you to play cards face up on the table and conclude that it doesn't actually require your opponents to see them.
You're not a lawyer by any chance?
-
It is an impressive act of mental gymnastics to see a rule that tells you to play cards face up on the table and conclude that it doesn't actually require your opponents to see them.
You're not a lawyer by any chance?
I am not. I agree with you that it is obvious. I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
-
It is an impressive act of mental gymnastics to see a rule that tells you to play cards face up on the table and conclude that it doesn't actually require your opponents to see them.
You're not a lawyer by any chance?
I am not. I agree with you that it is obvious. I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
She has to let you see all of the cards she plays, including treasures.
-
She has to let you see all of the cards she plays, including treasures.
Thanks!
-
But you do not have to play (or reveal) all of your Treasures, just enough to generate the amount you want to spend. It is often sensible to hide the fact that you drew into all of your Gold early in a shuffle.
-
I am not. I agree with you that it is obvious. I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
If I was playing with someone who tried to pull something like that, they would quickly find themselves on my "people I don't play games with" list.
But you do not have to play (or reveal) all of your Treasures, just enough to generate the amount you want to spend. It is often sensible to hide the fact that you drew into all of your Gold early in a shuffle.
Yeah, that is an important distinction.
As Donald said, she has to show you all the cards she plays, not all of her cards.
In my clean-up phase I make it a habit to scoop my played cards on top of my unplayed cards before putting them in my discard pile.
That way I don't reveal any of my unplayed cards.
You never want to give your opponent more info than you need to.
-
If I was playing with someone who tried to pull something like that, they would quickly find themselves on my "people I don't play games with" list.
I am far too desperate for people to play Dominion with to have such a list.
-
If I was playing with someone who tried to pull something like that, they would quickly find themselves on my "people I don't play games with" list.
I am far too desperate for people to play Dominion with to have such a list.
If you're really desperate you could try Goko.
-
I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
Man I hate when people do that. "Here, let me vaguely flash my cards at you then take a card costing what I say I flashed."
-
I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
Man I hate when people do that. "Here, let me vaguely flash my cards at you then take a card costing what I say I flashed."
This is something I wish I understood. I feel like just about every player I play with does this. They just look at their hand and say "uh... I have 3 gold[sic], so uh, I'll buy a Silver." I'm probably doing some something wrong when I teach the game because no one seems to feel like actually playing treasures is something they need to do.
-
Note that treasure cards, just like action cards, must be played one at a time. You cannot technically play multiple treasures all at once, though in practice to speed things up people may do that sometimes. But even if they physically just lay down their hand of treasures, there is technically an order to which they are played.
-
I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
Man I hate when people do that. "Here, let me vaguely flash my cards at you then take a card costing what I say I flashed."
This is something I wish I understood. I feel like just about every player I play with does this. They just look at their hand and say "uh... I have 3 gold[sic], so uh, I'll buy a Silver." I'm probably doing some something wrong when I teach the game because no one seems to feel like actually playing treasures is something they need to do.
You're not doing something wrong. Rather, it appears that some people tend to deliberate given rules under logical, or rational, assumptions, while others just don't. People on this forum, I would assume, have a desire to play correctly and comprehensibly. But casual players rarely think about these things and probably don't want to be bothered with what is "finical" in their eyes.
-
I have a hard time convincing people that I play with in real life that they actually need to play their treasures. People have a tendency to not follow the formal steps "until it matters" (like, in cases where they aren't playing all of their treasures). Through most of the game they just flash their hand and take a card from the supply, which really bothers me in a pedantic way.
Edit: Well, basically exactly what Deadlock said.
-
I have discovered that when one slows down and actually plays their cards they often find mistakes and oversights they were literally waving away before.
-
At the tournament this weekend, I heard of some rather interesting things people do IRL.
I got a lot of the "I have this much money, I buy this" without showing the hand. I'll only correct that if I'm in the game with them (and I'm sure I'm annoying when I do it).
An interesting one is where everybody plays their turn simultaneously. I have no idea what they do when Militia is in a game.
There was one guy who likes to play his treasures and then his actions. I have no idea how that works if he draws cards with his action.
Of course, I didn't teach any of these people how to play :P
-
I have a hard time convincing people that I play with in real life that they actually need to play their treasures. People have a tendency to not follow the formal steps "until it matters" (like, in cases where they aren't playing all of their treasures). Through most of the game they just flash their hand and take a card from the supply, which really bothers me in a pedantic way.
Edit: Well, basically exactly what Deadlock said.
The "until it mattes" in this case is Horn of Plenty. I have played with people who argue that treasure cards do not count towards it because they are not played.
-
I was trying to prove to my opponent that she needed to show me her treasures when she bought a card.
Man I hate when people do that. "Here, let me vaguely flash my cards at you then take a card costing what I say I flashed."
This is something I wish I understood. I feel like just about every player I play with does this. They just look at their hand and say "uh... I have 3 gold[sic], so uh, I'll buy a Silver." I'm probably doing some something wrong when I teach the game because no one seems to feel like actually playing treasures is something they need to do.
You're not doing something wrong. Rather, it appears that some people tend to deliberate given rules under logical, or rational, assumptions, while others just don't. People on this forum, I would assume, have a desire to play correctly and comprehensibly. But casual players rarely think about these things and probably don't want to be bothered with what is "finical" in their eyes.
You can't say with certainty that DeadLock isn't doing something wrong unless you've actually seen him teach the game.
I would just be very clear that you have to play the treasures. The basic reason is so people can confirm how much coin you have to spend. The advanced reason is that there are cards where it matters that the newbie has yet to see. If you are explicit about what to do and also give a reasonable explanation why, I find that most people can follow the rules just fine.
-
At the tournament this weekend, I heard of some rather interesting things people do IRL.
I got a lot of the "I have this much money, I buy this" without showing the hand.
An interesting one is where everybody plays their turn simultaneously.
There was one guy who likes to play his treasures and then his actions. I have no idea how that works if he draws cards with his action.
...This really bugs me.
-
I have a hard time convincing people that I play with in real life that they actually need to play their treasures. People have a tendency to not follow the formal steps "until it matters" (like, in cases where they aren't playing all of their treasures). Through most of the game they just flash their hand and take a card from the supply, which really bothers me in a pedantic way.
Edit: Well, basically exactly what Deadlock said.
The "until it mattes" in this case is Horn of Plenty. I have played with people who argue that treasure cards do not count towards it because they are not played.
Bank is an easy counter-argument. Also note that all the special treasures including HoP say "when you play this".
-
I have a hard time convincing people that I play with in real life that they actually need to play their treasures. People have a tendency to not follow the formal steps "until it matters" (like, in cases where they aren't playing all of their treasures). Through most of the game they just flash their hand and take a card from the supply, which really bothers me in a pedantic way.
Edit: Well, basically exactly what Deadlock said.
The "until it mattes" in this case is Horn of Plenty. I have played with people who argue that treasure cards do not count towards it because they are not played.
Grand Market would disagree.
-
I have a hard time convincing people that I play with in real life that they actually need to play their treasures. People have a tendency to not follow the formal steps "until it matters" (like, in cases where they aren't playing all of their treasures). Through most of the game they just flash their hand and take a card from the supply, which really bothers me in a pedantic way.
Edit: Well, basically exactly what Deadlock said.
The "until it mattes" in this case is Horn of Plenty. I have played with people who argue that treasure cards do not count towards it because they are not played.
Grand Market would disagree.
I know so would Counterfeit, Contraband and possibly some others I haven't thought of. I just mentioned HoP because that has happened to me. I did win the argument buy pointing out that the card refers to counting itself.
-
Most the time when I request people to show me their cards when they are supposed to they do. Sometimes people offer resistance and get defensive because they say that I think they are cheating and they wouldn't cheat. I say I just want to make sure they did everything right. Everybody makes mistakes sometimes. People have corrected me when I've made a mistake playing Dominion and I have corrected others. Revealing your cards at appropriate times is very important so that errors are not made.
-
What's the problem revealing treasures, why do people act this way? I mean, players have to show all the cards they play in almost every game including cards. Mau Mau, Skat, Rummy, Settlers, Descent etc.
I don't get it. It's a matter of couse. What's wrong with people? :-\
-
What about Dominion: Coup? You can buy cards without showing your Treasures, but any other player can challenge. If the player was lying, the buy fails, and the loser of the challenge gets a Curse.
-
What about Dominion: Coup? You can buy cards without showing your Treasures, but any other player can challenge. If the player was lying, the buy fails, and the loser of the challenge gets a Curse.
I have no coin or treasure. I buy province, opponent challenges, I reveal Trader and gain a Silver.
-
What about Dominion: Coup? You can buy cards without showing your Treasures, but any other player can challenge. If the player was lying, the buy fails, and the loser of the challenge gets a Curse.
Me: I have 2 buys. I buy Province.
Opponent: Okay
Me: With my second buy, I buy Province.
Opponent: Alright, there's no way, I have to challenge that.
Me: show 2 Gold and one Silver
Opponent: Hah! Take a Curse.
Me: No, I was lying the first time and you failed to call me on it. This time, I was telling the truth. You take a Curse.
-
What about Dominion: Coup? You can buy cards without showing your Treasures, but any other player can challenge. If the player was lying, the buy fails, and the loser of the challenge gets a Curse.
Me: I have 2 buys. I buy Province.
Opponent: Okay
Me: With my second buy, I buy Province.
Opponent: Alright, there's no way, I have to challenge that.
Me: show 2 Gold and one Silver
Opponent: Hah! Take a Curse.
Me: No, I was lying the first time and you failed to call me on it. This time, I was telling the truth. You take a Curse.
Kenny vs. Spenny
-
From now on, I'm just going to warn players that, for their first game, I'm going to be incredibly pedantic, and they're going to hate me for it, but when they play every other game after the first, they'll be glad that I did.
-
I'm a big stickler for correct play. I usually will try to explain why something matters in relation to some card that they haven't seen yet or have forgotten about, like making sure they play their treasures because the order matters with Bank for example. I'm sure I get plenty of eye rolls and sighs but it makes things go more smoothly in the long run.
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
Better whip out the Haunted Woods.
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
For at the start of the turn all you have to do is point to any card that draws cards; and explain reshuffling. For the start of the buy phase, it's trickier.
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
For at the start of the turn all you have to do is point to any card that draws cards; and explain reshuffling. For the start of the buy phase, it's trickier.
Loan (might reshuffle), Venture (might reshuffle), Philosopher's Stone (cares how many you have in discard), Inn (when-gain that makes you reshuffle), Doctor (when-buy: might reshuffle), Hovel (when-buy: might reshuffle), Haunted Woods (when-buy).
More unusual: Watchtower (could trash Cultist or Rats on when-gain, then might reshuffle - weird to do in buy phase though), Herald (overpay: the cards you discarded shouldn't be available to put on your deck - but you probably wouldn't want to anyway).
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
For at the start of the turn all you have to do is point to any card that draws cards; and explain reshuffling. For the start of the buy phase, it's trickier.
Loan (might reshuffle), Venture (might reshuffle), Philosopher's Stone (cares how many you have in discard), Inn (when-gain that makes you reshuffle), Doctor (when-buy: might reshuffle), Hovel (when-buy: might reshuffle), Haunted Woods (when-buy).
More unusual: Watchtower (could trash Cultist or Rats on when-gain, then might reshuffle - weird to do in buy phase though), Herald (overpay: the cards you discarded shouldn't be available to put on your deck - but you probably wouldn't want to anyway).
Right but the point is that in your average game, and especially your average game with beginners, it is likely that none of those cards will be in the game. But most games will have at least 1 card that can draw.
-
*bangs fists on table*
IT JUST MATTERS, DAMMIT
-
*bangs fists on table*
IT JUST MATTERS, DAMMIT
THAT'S IT WE ARE PLAYING MONOPOLY
-
*bangs fists on table*
IT JUST MATTERS, DAMMIT
THAT'S IT WE ARE PLAYING MONOPOLY
Well, you have a monopoly with that train of thought. While monopolies are considered bad for economic reasons, this time, it's bad for another reason... Speaking of reason, come back to it!
-
Speaking of reason, come back to it!
But I prefer FL Studio.
-
Speaking of reason, come back to it!
But I prefer FL Studio.
I use Logic, myself. Much better than Reason. I don't know why you consider yourself a Fruit Loop.
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
For at the start of the turn all you have to do is point to any card that draws cards; and explain reshuffling. For the start of the buy phase, it's trickier.
Yes, pretty much. What I do is look for any card that it'll matter for. Start of turn is easy, as you say - any drawing card, almost all sifting cards, cards that interact with your hand size, discard pile or deck in some way, whatever. Loads of stuff this can matter for. Start of buy phase requires much more specific cards, such as Philosopher's Stone, Loan, Inn and so on.
-
A similar issue I've had with people that I don't think I've seen mentioned here is people who, at the start of their turn, put cards they don't want to (or can't) use into their discard pile. Usually victory cards. Some people just do it at the start of their buy phase. In both cases I remind them it's wrong, but often this is rebutted by "why does it matter?" to which I either have to hope a: a relevant card is in the kingdom (easy enough for start of turn but harder for start of buy phase) or b: that I can convince them they should do it because it sometimes matters. Which often works but not always.
Edit: Scumslipped and used < brackets > not [ brackets ]
For at the start of the turn all you have to do is point to any card that draws cards; and explain reshuffling. For the start of the buy phase, it's trickier.
Loan (might reshuffle), Venture (might reshuffle), Philosopher's Stone (cares how many you have in discard), Inn (when-gain that makes you reshuffle), Doctor (when-buy: might reshuffle), Hovel (when-buy: might reshuffle), Haunted Woods (when-buy).
More unusual: Watchtower (could trash Cultist or Rats on when-gain, then might reshuffle - weird to do in buy phase though), Herald (overpay: the cards you discarded shouldn't be available to put on your deck - but you probably wouldn't want to anyway).
How does the when-buy on Hovel cause a reshuffle? It cares about being in your hand during the buy phase though. Farmland also cares about what's in your hand.
-
I think he means the shelter that draws when trashed.
-
Loan (might reshuffle), Venture (might reshuffle), Philosopher's Stone (cares how many you have in discard), Inn (when-gain that makes you reshuffle), Doctor (when-buy: might reshuffle), Hovel (when-buy: might reshuffle), Haunted Woods (when-buy).
More unusual: Watchtower (could trash Cultist or Rats on when-gain, then might reshuffle - weird to do in buy phase though), Herald (overpay: the cards you discarded shouldn't be available to put on your deck - but you probably wouldn't want to anyway).
Right but the point is that in your average game, and especially your average game with beginners, it is likely that none of those cards will be in the game. But most games will have at least 1 card that can draw.
I know, but I wanted to catalog the ones I could think of.
Oh and I thought of a corner case for Herald: You have a Tournament in your deck, and a Province in your hand. If you could discard the Province, you could overpay for Herald to put the Province on top. Or, you have two buys and a Province in your hand. If you could discard the Province, you could buy a Tournament and overpay for Herald to put the Province and the Tournament on top.
How does the when-buy on Hovel cause a reshuffle? It cares about being in your hand during the buy phase though. Farmland also cares about what's in your hand.
Right, I was mixing up Hovel and Overgrown Estate, creating a hybrid in my mind. But as you said, it could matter if you discard Hovel, and also Farmland.